Advertisement

The Effect of Closely-Coupled Interaction on Player Experience in Casual Games

  • Anastasiia Beznosyk
  • Peter Quax
  • Wim Lamotte
  • Karin Coninx
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7522)

Abstract

This paper presents a study investigating cooperation between players in casual games. Although widely used in co-located or asynchronous settings, cooperative gameplay elements are not popular in networked synchronous casual games. In our study, we have analyzed different types of cooperation between players in casual games. Each of these is based on a certain cooperative game design pattern, and can be classified as either closely- or loosely-coupled. Six game patterns have been selected and an equal number of games developed, each targeting one pattern. By means of a user experiment we have investigated which cooperation types fit most of the criteria that define casual games. More specifically, we have focused on the applicability of close coupling between players. Based on the games used in the experiment, most patterns with closely-coupled interaction have shown an overall higher user evaluation than loosely-coupled, satisfying criteria of casual games. These results indicate that introducing close coupling in the casual games under consideration is a potential way to increase the player experience.

Keywords

casual games cooperative game patterns closely-coupled interaction loosely-coupled interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    The Nielsen Company: Insights on casual games: analysis of casual games for the PC (2009), http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/GamerReport.pdf
  2. 2.
    Li, K.A., Counts, S.: Exploring social interactions and attributes of casual multiplayer mobile gaming. In: Proc. Mobility 2007, pp. 696–703. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mueller, F.’., Gibbs, M.R.: Evaluating a distributed physical leisure game for three players. In: Proc. OZCHI 2007, pp. 143–150. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gajadhar, B., Nap, H., de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W.: Let’s sweep some mines together: Social interaction & competition in casual games. In: Proc. Fun and Games 2010, pp. 19–30 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogost, I.: Asynchronous multiplay: Futures for casual multiplayer experience. In: Proc. Other Players Conference 2004 (2004), http://www.bogost.com/downloads/i.%20bogost%20-%20asynchronous%20multiplay.pdf
  6. 6.
    Di Loreto, I., Gouaich, A.: Social casual games success is not so casual (2010), http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00486934
  7. 7.
    Ricchetti, M.: What makes social games social? (2002), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6735
  8. 8.
    El-Nasr, M.S., Aghabeigi, B., Milam, D., Erfani, M., Lameman, B., Maygoli, H., Mah, S.: Understanding and evaluating cooperative games. In: Proc. CHI 2010, pp. 253–262. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGee, K.: Patterns and computer game design innovation. In: Proc. IE 2007, RMIT University, pp. 16:1–16:8 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreimeier, B.: The case for game design patterns (2002), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4261
  11. 11.
    Björk, S., Holopainen, J.: Patterns in Game Design (Game Development Series). Charles River Media, Inc. (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rocha, J.B., Mascarenhas, S.P.R.: Game mechanics for cooperative games. In: ZDN Digital Game, pp. 73–80 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmeil, A., Eppler, M.J.: Knowledge sharing and collaborative learning in Second Life: a classification of virtual 3D group interaction scripts. Journal of Universal Computer Science 14, 665–677 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ducheneaut, N., Moore, R.J.: The social side of gaming: a study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. In: Proc. CSCW 2004, pp. 360–369. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goh, W.B., Fitriani, Ting, L.G., Shou, W., Goh, C.F., Menon, M., Tan, J., Cohen, L.G.: Potential challenges in collaborative game design for inclusive settings (2011), http://www.dfki.de/educationchi2011/
  16. 16.
    Zagal, J.P., Rick, J., Hsi, I.: Collaborative games: lessons learned from board games. Simulation and Gaming 37(1), 24–40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beznosyk, A., Quax, P., Coninx, K., Lamotte, W.: The influence of cooperative game design patterns for remote play on player experience. In: Proc. APCHI 2012. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beznosyk, A., Quax, P., Coninx, K., Lamotte, W.: User enjoyment and performance in collaborative and cooperative games in shared 3d virtual environments. In: Proc. GRAPP 2011, pp. 302–307 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasiia Beznosyk
    • 1
  • Peter Quax
    • 1
  • Wim Lamotte
    • 1
  • Karin Coninx
    • 1
  1. 1.tUL - IBBT, Expertise Centre for Digital MediaHasselt UniversityDiepenbeekBelgium

Personalised recommendations