"5 Days in August" – How London Local Authorities Used Twitter during the 2011 Riots

  • Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos
  • Alinaghi Ziaee Bigdeli
  • Steven Sams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7443)

Abstract

This study examines effects of microblogging communications during emergency events based on the case of the summer 2011 riots in London. During five days in August 2011, parts of London and other major cities in England suffered from extensive public disorders, violence and even loss of human lives. We collected and analysed the tweets posted by the official accounts maintained by 28 London local government authorities. Those authorities used Twitter for a variety of purposes such as preventing rumours, providing official information, promoting legal actions against offenders and organising post-riot community engagement activities. The study shows how the immediacy and communicative power of microblogging can have a significant effect at the response and recovery stages of emergency events.

Keywords

Twitter microblogging social media London riots UK local government emergency communication disaster management 

References

  1. 1.
    BBC: English Riots: Social Media were ’Force for Good’ (2011), http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14931010 (accessed June 15, 2012)
  2. 2.
    Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Hansen, D.: The Impact of Polices on Government Social Media Usage: Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations. Government Information Quarterly 29, 30–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruns, A.: How Long is a Tweet? Mapping Dynamic Converstation Networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication & Society (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho, S.E., Park, H.W.: Government Organizations’ Innovative use of the Internet: The Case of the Twitter Activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Scientometrics 90, 9–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crump, J.: What are the Police Doing on Twitter? Social Media, the Police and the Public. Policy & Internet 3, 1–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hale, J.E.: Crisis Response Communication Challenges: Building Theory from Qualitative Data. Journal of Business Communication 42, 112–134 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heverin, T., Zach, L.: Twitter for City Police Department Information Sharing. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, 1–7 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heverin, T., Zach, L.: Use of Microblogging for Collective Sense-Making during Violent Crises: A Study of Three Campus Shootings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 34–47 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Honey, C., Herring, S.C.: Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration Via Twitter. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horsley, J.S., Barker, R.T.: Toward a Synthesis Model for Crisis Communication in the Public Sector: An Initial Investigation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 16, 406–440 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., et al.: Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, 2169–2188 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mashable, A.: Visual History of Twitter (2011), http://mashable.com/2011/09/30/twitter-history-infographic/
  14. 14.
    Oh, O., Kwon, K.H., Rao, H.R.: An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events: Rumor Theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osimo, D.: Web 2.0 in Government: Why and how? JRC Scientific and Technical Reports (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panagiotopoulos, P., Sams, S.: An Overview Study of Twitter in the UK Local Government, Transforming Government Workshop, Brunel University, London (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riots Panel: 5 Days in August: An Interim Report on the 2011 English Riots (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Segerberg, A., Bennett, W.L.: Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests. The Communication Review 14, 197–215 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sinnappan, S., Farrell, C., Stewart, E.: Priceless Tweets! A Study on Twitter Messages Posted during Crisis: Black Saturday. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Small, T.A.: What the Hashtag? A Content Analysis of Canadian Politics on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society 14, 872–895 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., Wellman, B.: Geography of Twitter Networks. Social Networks 34, 73–81 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tonkin, E., Pfeiffer, H.D., Tourte, G.: Twitter, Information Sharing and the London Riots? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 38, 49–57 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Waters, R.D., Williams, J.M.: Squawking, Tweeting, Cooing, and Hooting: Analyzing the Communication Patterns of Government Agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affairs 11, 353–363 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waugh, W.L., Streib, G.: Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management. Public Administration Review 66, 131–140 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wigand, F.D.: Twitter Takes Wing in Government: Diffusion, Roles, and Management. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities, pp. 66–71 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis Panagiotopoulos
    • 1
  • Alinaghi Ziaee Bigdeli
    • 1
  • Steven Sams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and ComputingBrunel UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations