Advertisement

Productivity and Local Workforce Composition

  • David Christopher MaréEmail author
  • Richard Fabling
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

This chapter examines the link between firm productivity and the population composition of the areas in which firms operate. We combine annual firm-level microdata with area-level workforce characteristics obtained from population censuses. Overall, the results confirm the existence of agglomeration effects that operate through local labour markets. We find evidence of productive spillovers from operating in areas with high-skilled workers, and with high population density. The strength and nature of spillovers varies across different types of firms. Our findings demonstrate the importance of controlling for multiple dimensions of local workforce composition, and of analysing effects for subpopulations of firms.

Keywords

Productivity Agglomeration Workforce composition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors, Riccardo Crescenzi and Marco Percoco, for encouraging our contribution, and for comments on an earlier draft. This work has been partially funded as part of the New Zealand Department of Labour’s Economic Impacts of Immigration research programme. Thanks to participants at the CRENoS/University of Southampton workshop on “Determinants and Effects of Interregional Mobility”, and the 2010 ERSA Congress, and to Steve Stillman for comments on earlier versions of this paper. Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand in accordance with security and confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act 1975 and the Tax Administration Act 1994. The results in this paper have been confidentialised to protect individual businesses from identification. See Maré and Fabling (2011) for the full disclaimer.

References

  1. Amiti M, Pissarides CA (2005) Trade and industrial location with heterogeneous labor. J Int Econ 67(2):392–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  3. Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson VJ, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1454–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabling R (2009) A rough guide to New Zealand’s Longitudinal Business Database. Global COE Hi-stat discussion paper GD09-103. Hitotsubashi University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  6. Fabling R (2011) Keeping it together: tracking firms in New Zealand’s Longitudinal Business Database. Motu working paper, pp 11–01Google Scholar
  7. Fabling R, Maré DC (2011) Production function estimation using New Zealand’s Longitudinal Business Database. Motu working paper (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  8. Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M (2010) How much does immigration boost innovation? Am Econ J Macroecon 2(2):31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart J Econ 108:577–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maré DC, Fabling R (2011) Productivity and local workforce composition. Motu working paper 11–06Google Scholar
  12. Maré DC, Hyslop DR (2006) Worker-firm heterogeneity and matching: an analysis using worker and firm fixed effects estimated from LEED. Leed research report, Statistics New Zealand, Wellington. Available online at www.stats.govt.nz, Accessed 1 June 2011
  13. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, London. Available online at http://www.econlib.org/library/Marshall/marP1.html. Last accessed 4 Nov 2005
  14. Moretti E (2004a) Human capital externalities in cities. In: Henderson JV, Jacques-Francois T (eds) Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol 4, Cities and geography., pp 2243–2291Google Scholar
  15. Moretti E (2004b) Workers; education, spillovers, and productivity: evidence from plant-level production functions. Am Econ Rev 94(3):656–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moulton BR (1990) An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro unit. Rev Econ Stat 72(2):334–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Overman HG, Puga D (2010) Labour pooling as a source of agglomeration: an empirical investigation. In: Glaeser EL (ed) Agglomeration economics. Chicago University Press, Chicago (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  18. Papps KL, Newell JO (2002) Identifying functional labour market areas in New Zealand: a reconnaissance study using travel-to-work data. IZA discussion paper 443. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn. Available online at ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp443.pdf. Last accessed 30 June 2005
  19. Rauch JE (1993) Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J Urban Econ 34(3):380–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith A (1904) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, vol 5. Methuen and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenthal S, Strange W (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson VJ, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Zucker LG, Darby MR (2009) Star scientists, innovation and regional and national immigration. In: Audretsch DB, Litan RE, Strom RJ (eds) Entrepreneurship and openness: theory and evidence. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 181–212Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Motu Economic and Public Policy Research and University of WaikatoWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Motu Economic and Public Policy ResearchWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations