Advertisement

Environmental Standards, Delocalization and Employment: The Case of the EU Cement Industry

  • Maria Giovanna BoscoEmail author
  • Carlo Altomonte
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

CO2 emission reduction is on the political agenda of all developed countries. In this paper we try to assess the impact on one energy – intensive industry, cement, of a likely rise in the cost of pollution permits generated by the new EU cap-and-trade system on emissions (EU ETS). Exploiting the characteristics of the industry (high unit transport costs and homogeneous product), we present a theoretical model of market segmentation for the overall EU regional area. Based on this, we then provide an estimate of the economic effects for the industry of an increase in the production costs due to the full enforcement (auctioning) of the new European ETS system, i.e. in the case of its implementation without free allowances or carbon leakage provisions. We proceed in two steps: first, we estimate the extent to which the increase in environmental costs leads to a substitution of locally produced cement with imports from non EU countries, not subject to the ETS; second, we estimate the impact of this substitution effect on the employment of the industry. We find that in case of full auctioning of allowances the overall impact on employment would be negative, leading to a loss of some 25 % of jobs in the industry. The latter strongly justifies the use of carbon leakage provisions in the upcoming European regulation.

Keywords

Environmental standards Trade Delocalization 

References

  1. AITEC (2006) Relazione Annuale, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiti M, Wei S-J (2004) Fear of service outsourcing: is it justified? NBER working paper 10808Google Scholar
  3. Amiti M, Wei S-J (2007) Does service offshoring lead to job losses? Evidence from the United States, mimeoGoogle Scholar
  4. Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Int Monet Fund Staff Pap 16:159–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubert P, Sillard P (2005) Offshoring and job losses in French industry. Working paper G 2005 7 03, National Institute for Statistics and Economic StudiesGoogle Scholar
  6. Babiker MH (2005) Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J Int Econ 65(2):421–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blinder AS (2005) Fear of offshoring. CEPS working paper no. 119, Dec 2005Google Scholar
  8. Boston Consulting Group (2008) Assessment of the impact of the 2013–2020 ETS proposal on the European cement industry. http://www.cembureau.be/topics/climate-change/etd-carbon-leakage, Accessed November 2008
  9. Bruegel Policy Brief (by J. Delgado) (2007) Why Europe is not carbon competitive. Issue 2007/05, Nov 2007Google Scholar
  10. Cembureau (2008) CEMBUREAU’s comments to the European Commission’s Communication “Further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the EU emissions trading scheme” (COM (2005) 703 final). www.cembureau.be, Accessed December 2008
  11. Comext (2008) International Trade Statistics of the European Commission. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/newxtweb/
  12. Cortes O, Jean S (1996) Pays émergents, emploi déficient?, CEPII, Document de travail, n° 96–05, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Demailly D, Quirion P (2007) Changing the allocation rules for EU greenhouse gas allowances: Impact on competitiveness, revenue distribution and economic efficiency. European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2007 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferraz do CLP, Haddad EA, Terra MC (2010) The long run interplay between trade policy and the location of economic activity in Brazil revisited. Fundação Getulio Vargas, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2007) Imposing a unilateral carbon constraint on energy-intensive industries and its impact on their international competitiveness: data and analysis. European economy economic papers, no 298, Dec 2007, by Manfred Bergmann, Andreas Schmitz, Mark Hayden, Katri KosonenGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2008) Impact assessment. Document accompanying the package of implementation measures for the EU’s objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020. Proposals for DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the EU greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system, SEC(2008) 85/3Google Scholar
  17. European Commission, McKinsey and Company, Ecofys (2006) EU ETS REVIEW Report on international competitivenessGoogle Scholar
  18. European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), Instituto Sindical de Trabajo, Ambiente y Salud (ISTAS), Social Development Agency (SDA), Syndex, Wuppertal Institute (2007) Climate change and employment. Impact on employment in the European Union-25 of climate change and CO2 emission reduction measures by 2030Google Scholar
  19. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (1996) Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality. Am Econ Rev LXXXVI:240–45Google Scholar
  20. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (1999) The impact of outsourcing and high technology capital on wages: estimates for the United States 1979–1990. Q J Econ 114(3):907–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feenstra RC, Hanson GH (2003) Global production sharing and rising inequality: a survey of trade and wages. In: Choi K, Harrigan J (eds) Handbook of international trade. Basil Blackwell, Malden, pp 146–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. GTAP (2002) GTAP 5 Data Package Documentation, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Head K, Mayer T (2000) Non Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Weltwirtschaftlich Arch 136:285–314Google Scholar
  24. Jensen JB, Kletzer LG (2005) Tradable services: understanding the scope and impact of services outsourcing. Institute for International Economics working paper WP 5–09Google Scholar
  25. JRC and IPTS (2007) Global climate policy scenarios for 2030 and beyond: analysis of greenhouse gas emission reduction pathway scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. European Commission JRCGoogle Scholar
  26. Kletzer LG (2000) Trade and job loss in US. Manufacturing, 1979–1994. In: Feenstra RC (ed) The impact of international trade on wages. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 349–396Google Scholar
  27. Kletzer LG (2001) Job loss from imports: measuring the costs. Peterson Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolk A, Pinkse J (2008) A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: learning from “an inconvenient truth”? J Int Bus Stud 39(8):1359–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koschel H, Schmidt T (1998) Modelling of Foreign Trade in Applied General Equilibrium Models: Theoretical Approaches and Sensivity Analysis with the GEM-E3 Model, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 98–08, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  30. Levy DL (2005) Offshoring in the new global political economy. J Manage Stud 42(3):685–693, May 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mani M, Wheeler D (1997) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960–1995, mimeo. Paper presented at the OECD conference on FDI and environment, The Hague, 28–29 Jan 1999Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2005) The competitiveness impact of CO2 emission reduction in the cement sector. COM/ENV/EPOC/CTPA/CFA(2004)68/final, prepared by D. and P. Quirion of CIRED, FranceGoogle Scholar
  33. Pietroboni R, Gregori T (2003) An input–output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies. Constr Manage Econ 21:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reinert K, Roland-Holst D (1992) Armington Elasticities for United States Manufacturing Sectors. Journal of Policy Modeling 14:631–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanna-Randaccio F, Sestini R (2009) Foreign direct investment and environmental policy: have location factors been neglected? Paper presented at the ETSG 2009, Rome, Eleventh annual conference, 10–12 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  36. Syverson C (2004) Market structure and productivity: a concrete example. J Pol Econ 112(6):1181–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Syverson C (2008) Markets: ready-mixed concrete. J Econ Perspect 22(1):217–234, Winter 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Szabó L, Hidalgo I, Ciscar JC, Soria A (2006) CO2 emission trading within the European Union and annex B countries: the cement industry case. Energy Pol 34:72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISLABocconi UniversityMilanItaly
  2. 2.IAM Bocconi University and SDA BocconiMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations