Abstract
Knowledge flows between universities and industry have long been recognised as important determinants of regional economic development. However, a major unresolved issue is the exact nature of the mechanisms through which knowledge flows take place. We analyse the spatial patterns of knowledge exchange activities by considering a wide range of mechanisms including joint research, consultancy services, personnel exchange and informal advice. The analysis is based on a recently completed survey of UK academics, providing micro-data on over 22,000 academics across all subject areas. Our results show that the geography of academic entrepreneurship varies widely by type of activity.
JEL codes: O31, O32, R11
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The survey was part of a 2-year project on “University-Industry Knowledge Exchange: Demand Pull, Supply Push and the Public Space Role of Higher Education Institutions in the UK Regions”, with grant number ESRC- RES-171-25-0018, which was carried out over 2007–2009. The project involved Maria Abreu, Vadim Grinevich, Alan Hughes and Michael Kitson, and was sponsored by Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) in partnership with the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Department for Employment and Learning (DEL) in Northern Ireland, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW).
- 2.
See Abreu et al. (2009) for further details. The data are available through the UK Data Archive (http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/) and are listed under “Cambridge Centre for Business Research Survey of Knowledge Exchange Activity by United Kingdom Academics, 2005–2009”, archive no. SN 6462.
- 3.
The “Higher Education – Business and Community Interaction Survey 2007–08” data are available through the Higher Education Funding Council for England (http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_23).
- 4.
Because the survey allows respondents to choose more than one geography for each type of activity, Fig. 1 has been drawn so that the total percentage for each activity is the percentage of academics engaged in that activity at any geographical level, while the breakdown by geography shows the percentage of those engaged in that activity who indicated a specific geography.
References
Abramovsky L, Harrison R, Simpson H (2007) University research and the location of business R&D. Econ J 117:C114–C141
Abreu M, Grinevich (2010) Personal, institutional and spatial determinants of academic entrepreneurship in the UK. Paper presented at the 50th anniversary European Congress of the Regional Science Association International, Jönköping, Sweden, 19–23 Aug 2010
Abreu M, Grinevich V, Hughes A, Kitson M (2009) Knowledge exchange between academics and the business, public and third sectors. UK Innovation Research Centre, University of Cambridge and Imperial College, London
Acs ZJ, Audretsch D, Feldman M (1992) Real effects of academic research: comment. Am Econ Rev 82(1):363–367
Ambos TC, Mäkelä K, Birkinshaw J, D’Este P (2008) When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. J Manage Stud 45:1424–1447
Anselin L, Varga A, Acs ZJ (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42:422–448
Arundel A, Geuna A (2004) Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Econ Innov New Technol 13(6):559–580
Audretsch D, Lehmann E (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34:1191–1202
Audretsch D, Aldridge T, Oetti A et al (2005) The knowledge filter and economic growth: the role of scientist entrepreneurship. Discussion papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy N.1106. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena
Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2007) The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities? J Econ Behav Organ 63:599–623
Bauernschuster S, Falck O, Gold R, Heblich S et al (2011) Explicitly implicit: how institutional differences influence entrepreneurship. Ch 9 in this volume
Bellini E, Ottaviano G, Pinelli D, Prarolo G et al (2011) Cultural diversity and economic performance: evidence from European regions. Ch 8 in this volume
Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2003) Technology transfer and the academic department: who participates and why? Paper presented at the DRUID summer conference 2003, Copenhagen, 12–14 June 2003
Breschi S, Lissoni F (2001) Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Ind Corp Change 10(4):975–1005
Carayol N (2007) Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university. Econ Innov New Technol 16:119–138
Christman JJ, Hynes T, Fraser S (1995) Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary. J Buss Venturing 10:267–281
Collins S, Wakoh H (2000) Universities and technology transfer in Japan: recent reforms in historical perspective. J Technol Transf 25:213–222
Cooke P (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind Corp Change 10:945–974
Cooke P (2002) Knowledge economies. Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. Routledge, London
Crescenzi R, Gagliardi L Percoco M et al (2011) Culture and innovation: evidence from Italy. Ch 10 in this volume
D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J Technol Trans 36:316–339
D’Este P, Iammarino S (2010) The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships. Pap Reg Sci 89:335–350
Del Campo AA, Sparks A, Hill RC, Keller RT (1999) The transfer and commercialisation of university-developed medical imaging technology: opportunities and problems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 46(3):289–299
Di Liberto A, Usai S (2011) TFP convergence across European regions: a comparative spatial dynamics analysis. Ch 5 in this volume
Ding WW, Murray F, Stuart TE (2006) Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313:665–667
Feldman M (1994) The geography of innovation. Kluwer, Amsterdam
Friedman J, Silberman J (2003) University technology transfer: do incentives, management and location matter? J Technol Trans 28:17–30
Henderson R, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1998) Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev Econ Stat 80:119–127
Iammarino S, Piva M, Vivarelli M, von Tunzelmann N et al (2011) Firm capabilities and cooperation for innovation: Evidence from the UK regions. Ch 14 in this volume
Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79(5):957–970
Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patents citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598
Jensen R, Thursby M (2003) Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions. Am Econ Rev 91:240–259
Klofsten M, Jones-Evans D (2000) Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe – the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus Econ 14:299–309
Levin SG, Stephan PE (1991) Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. Am Econ Rev 81:114–132
Link AN, Siegel DS, Bozeman B (2007) An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Ind Corp Change 16:641–655
Louis KS, Jones LM, Anderson MS, Blumenthal D, Campbell EG (2001) Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: a comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty. J Technol Trans 26:233–245
Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial innovation. Res Policy 20:1–12
Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics and financing. Rev Econ Stat 77:55–65
Mansfield E (1998) Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Res Policy 26:773–776
Markman GD, Gianiodis PT, Phan PH, Balkin DB (2004) Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? J Technol Transfer 29:353–364
Morgan RP, Kruytbosch C, Kannankutty N (2001) Patenting and invention activity of U.S. scientists and engineers in the academic sector: comparisons with industry. J Technol Trans 26:173–183
Murray F (2002) Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Res Policy 31:1389–1403
Murray F, Graham L (2007) Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science. Ind Corp Change 16:657–689
Powers JB, McDougall PP (2005) Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Res Policy 34:1028–1042
Rothaermel FT, Agung SD, Jiang L (2007) University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Ind Corp Change 16:691–791
Siegel D, Waldman DA, Atwater LE, Link AN (2004) Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J Eng Technol Manage 21:115–142
Siegel D, Veugelers R, Wright M (2007) Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Rev Econ Pol 23(4):640–660
Stephan PE, Gurmu S, Sumell A, Black G (2007) Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from a survey of doctorate recipients. Econ Innov New Technol 16:71–99
Stokes DE (1997) Pasteurs quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Thompson P, Fox-Kean M (2005) Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: a reassessment. Am Econ Rev 95(1):450–460
Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2005) Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty. J Technol Trans 30:343–353
Thursby JG, Jensen RA, Thursby MC (2001) Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities. J Technol Trans 26:59–70
Whittington KB, Smith-Doerr L (2005) Gender and commercial science: women’s patenting in the life sciences. J Technol Trans 30:355–370
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. (2013). Academic Entrepreneurship and the Geography of University Knowledge Flows in the UK. In: Crescenzi, R., Percoco, M. (eds) Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33395-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33394-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33395-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)