New Internet-Based Relationships Between Citizens and Governments in the Public Space: Challenges for an Integrated System Design
This paper deals with the recent phenomenon of original and official data about the activity of governments and public administrations distributed through the Internet by private subjects. In this paper, adopting a design research approach, we discuss four recent cases and the software artifacts that were used in them. The aim of the paper is that of deriving a descriptive design theory for a software artifact for improving citizens’ capacity to act in the public space.
KeywordsTransparency Internet Explanatory design theory Government Public administrations Citizens E-participation
- 1.InternetWorldStats. (2001). Internet usage statistics the internet big picture. Retrieved Dec 22, 2011 from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
- 2.Kaufmann, D., & Bellver, A. (2005). Transparenting transparency: initial empirics and policy applications. Working Paper Series, The World Bank. Retrieved Dec 22, 2011 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=808664.
- 3.Gant, D. B., Gant, J. P., & Johnson, C. L. (2002). Enhancing E-Service delivery state web portals: Delivering and financing E-Service. Technical Report. PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/state-web-portals-delivering-and-financing-e-service
- 5.United Nations, & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. New York, NY: U. N. Publications.Google Scholar
- 7.Federici, T., & Braccini, A. M. (2012). How internet is upsetting the communication between organizations and their stakeholders: A research agenda. In: M. De Marco, D. Te’eni, V. Albano, S. Za (Eds.), Information systems: crossroads for organization, management, accounting and engineering. Springer: Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- 8.Walls, J. G., Widermeyer, G. R., & Sawy, O. A. E. (2004). Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(2), 43.Google Scholar
- 9.Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 8(5), 312–335.Google Scholar
- 11.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- 12.Federici, T., & Braccini, A. M. (2012). Internet, citizens, and public organizations: The power of service providers in fostering or hampering transparency. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Information Systems, Berlin, Germany, March 10–12.Google Scholar
- 13.Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- 14.Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.Google Scholar
- 16.Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Mowery, D. C., & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 67–93.Google Scholar
- 21.Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
- 22.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
- 25.Governo Italiano: Il Governo Informa (2011). Retrieved Jan 19, 2012 from http://www.governo.it/Presidenza/Comunicati/dettaglio.asp?d=61569.
- 27.Bower, J., & Christensen, C. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 7(1), 43–53.Google Scholar