Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing Communities Design: A Cross Case Analysis

  • Francesca Cabiddu
  • Manuel Castriotta
  • Maria Chiara Di Guardo
  • Paola Floreddu
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 1)

Abstract

While a great amount of literature has focused on the effects of open innovation and crowdsourcing strategy on firms’ competition and generation of ideas, we know little about how to design an IT artifact to manage the supporting of creativity among on line communities. Defining an interpretative framework which is based on the Design Theory concept, this paper aims to contribute to this body of knowledge by means of a cross-case study, focused on the design evaluation of two crowdsourcing-supporting IT platforms. We develop a theoretical framework for crowdsourcing communities, aimed to identify how the design characteristics shape the competition to generate new ideas, thereby influencing the crowdsourcing strategy.

Keywords

Crowdsourcing Design science Usability Interactivity Functionality Accuracy 

References

  1. 1.
    Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Books.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassiman, B., Di Guardo, M.C., & Valentini, G. (2009). Organizing R&D projects to profit from innovation insights from co-opetition. Long Range Planning, 42, (2) 216.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Von Hippel, E. & Von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the Private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14 (2), 209–223.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmel, E. (2006). Building your information systems from the other side of the world: How infosys manages time zone differences, MISQ Executive 5 (1), 43–53.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmel, E., & Agarwal, R. (2001). Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. IEEE Software , 18 (2), 22–29.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabiddu, F., Castriotta, M., Di Guardo, M.C., Floreddu, P. & Pettinao, D. (2012). Combining exploitation and exploration through crowdsourcing. In M. De Marco, D. Te’eni, V. Albano, S. Za (Eds.), Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spagnoletti P., Resca A. (2012). A design theory for IT supporting online communities. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-45), 4–7 January 2012, Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii, (pp. 4082–4091).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (2004). Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 rendition? Journal of Information Technology Theory and Practice, 6(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R. & El Sawy O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakhani, K.R., & Wolf, R.G. (2003). Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. MIT Sloan Working Paper no. 4425–03, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gant D.B. & Gant, J.P. (2002). Enhancing E-Service Delivery. E- Government Series, State Web Portals: Delivering and Financing E-Service. Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 77-87.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pina, V., Torres, L., & Royo, S. (2007). Are ICT’s improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local development. Public Administration, 85(2), 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leimeister, J.M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U. & Krcmar, H. (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing—activation-supporting components for IT-based idea competitions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26 (1), 197–224.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Surowiecky, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R., & Padda, H. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, 14, 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wand, Y., & Wang, R. Y. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. In J. Alba & W. Hutchinson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (vol. 25, pp. 366–371). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography. Doing ethnographic research online. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from nordic firms. Research Policy, 34, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fichman, G. (2004). Going beyond the dominant paradigm for IT innovation research: emerging concepts and methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5 (8), 314–355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Cabiddu
    • 1
  • Manuel Castriotta
    • 1
  • Maria Chiara Di Guardo
    • 1
  • Paola Floreddu
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations