Advertisement

The Role of Network Governance Models in the Design of Local eHealth Policies

  • Valentina Albano
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 1)

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the rich debate over the obstacles to the diffusion of eHealth technologies by investigating the role of the institutional setting on the success or failure of an IT diffusion policy. This work focuses on the policy network perspective and it is based on the expectation that the internal characteristics of the policy network influence the policy design. The main goal of this paper is to investigate how eHealth policy networks operate and to determine whether a more effective network governance configuration exists that could improve the design and deployment of successful eHealth projects. This work presents a case study of three Italian healthcare networks with different models of network governance: a Region-governed network, an eHealth Local Board-governed network and a Local Health Agencies’ Consortium-governed network. The focus of this investigation is on how the three models of network governance operate and influence the design of strategies to address the main challenges to eHealth implementation that have been identified by scholars and practitioners.

Keywords

Policy design Policy network Network governance eHealth 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper is part of the research project “Technology adoption and innovation in public services” (TAIPS). The project is carried out by the Department of Economics, Society and Politics (DESP), University of Urbino, Italy, and funded by Eiburs–EIB University Research Sponsorship Programme.

References

  1. 1.
    Simon, H. (1982). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masino, G., & Zamarian, M. (2003). Information technology artefacts as structuring devices in organizations: design, appropriation and use issues. Interacting with Computers, 15, 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grandori, A. (1991). Negotiating efficient organization forms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 16, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    March, J. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill, C. W. L. (1990). Cooperation opportunism and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academic of Management Review, 15(3), 500–513.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marsh, D. (1998). The development of the policy network approach. In D. Marsh (Ed.), Comparing policy networks. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1990). Policy networks: a British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daguerre, A. (2000) Policy networks in England and France: the case of child care policy 1980–1989. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 244–260.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoeijmakers, M., De Leeuw, E., Kenis, P., & De Vries, N. K. (2007). Local health policy development processes in the Netherlands: An expanded toolbox for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 22(2), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Acevedo, B., & Common, R. (2006). Governance and the management of networks in the public sector. Public Management Review, 8(3), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gerber, T. (2009). Health information technology: dispatches from the revolution. Health Affairs, 28(2), 390–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedman, C. P., Iakovidis, I., Debenedetti, L., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2009). Across the Atlantic cooperation to address international challenges in eHealth and health IT: Managing toward a common goal. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 778–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stroetmann, K. A., Artmann, J., & Stroetmann, V. (2011). Developing national eHealth infrastructures—results and lessons from Europe. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding, 2011, 1347–1354.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), E20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    European Commission (2004). eHealthmaking healthcare better for European citizens: An action plan for a European eHealth Area. Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Commission, European. (2010). 245 final. Brussels: A Digital Agenda for Europe.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleurant, M., Kell, R., Love, J., Jenter, C., Volk, L. A., Zhang, F., et al. (2011). Massachusetts E-Health project increased physicians’ ability to use registries, and signals progress toward better care. Health Affairs, 30(7), 1256–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jamal, A., McKenzie, K., & Clark, M. (2009). The impact of health information technology on the quality of medical and health care: A systematic review. Health Information Management Journal 38:26–3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stroetmann, K. A., Jones, T., Dobrev, A., & Veli, N. O. (2006). eHealth is worth it: the economic benefits of implemented eHealth solutions at ten European sites. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Angst, C., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 339–370.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bates, D. W. (2005). Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1180–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simon, S. R., Kaushal, R., Cleary, P. D., Jenter, C. A., Volk, L. A., & Poon, E. G. (2007). Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: A statewide survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(1), 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ERA Project (2007a). eHealth priorities and strategies in European countries. Retrieved from. http://www.ehealth-era.org/publications/publications.htm.
  25. 25.
    Anderson, J. G. (2007). Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(5), 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dixon B. E. (2007) A roadmap for the adoption of e-Health, e-Service Journal, 5(3), 3–13.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Löfgren, K. (2007). The governance of eGovernment: A governance perspective on the Swedish eGovernment strategy. Public Policy and Administration, 22, 335.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ellingsen, G., & Munkovold, G. (2007). Infrastructural arrangements for integrated care: Implementing an electronic nursing plan in a psychogeriatric ward. International Journal of Integrated Care, 7, 1–11.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Øvretveit, J. (1998). Integrated care: models and issues. Goteborg, Sweden: A Nordic school of Public Health Briefing paper.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kodner, D. I., & Spreeuwengerg, C. (2002). Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care, 14, 2.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gittell, J. H. (2002). Relationships between service providers and their impact on customers. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gittell, J. H., Fairfield, K., Bierbaum, B., Head, W., Jackson, R., Kelly, M., et al. (2000). Impact of relational coordination on the quality of care, post-operative pain and functioning, and the length of stay: A nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Medical Care, 38(8), 807–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shortel, S., Gillies, R., & Aanderson, D. (1994). The new world of managed care: Creating organized delivery systems. Health Affairs, 13, 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shortell, S., Gillies, R., & Devers, K. (1995). Reinventing the American hospital. The Milbank Quarterly, 73(2), 131–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lega, F. (1998). Scelte strategiche e definizione dei confini dell’ospedale. Dalla struttura focalizzata alla struttura a rete, Organizzazione Sanitaria, 1, 43–66.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Larzigoitia, I., & Starfield, B. (1997). Reform of primary health care: The case of Spain. Health Policy, 41, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fennell, M. L., & Warnecke, R. B. (1988). Diffusion of medical innovations: An applied network analysis. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Starkweather, D. B. (1990). Competition, integration, and diversification: Seven hospitals of Growthville, U.S.A. Journal of Health Administration Education, 8(4), 519–570.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Meijboom, B. (2004). Networks for integrated care provision: An economic approach based on opportunism and trust. Health Policy, 69(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phillips, W. (2006). Investigating innovation in complex health care supply networks: an initial conceptual framework. Health Services Management Research, 19(3), 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gill, L. (2011). Qualitative triadic study of the relational factors influencing the formation of quality in a community-based aged health care service network. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(2), 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lewis, J. M. (2005). Health policy and politics: networks, ideas and power. Melbourne: IP Communications.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Provan, K., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mount, C. D., Kelman, C. W., Smith, L. R., & Douglas, R. M. (2000). An integrated electronic health record and information system for Australia? Medical Journal of Australia, 172, 25–27.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bernstein, K., Bruun-Rasmussen, M., Vingtoft, S., Andersen, S., & Nøhr, C. (2005). Modelling and implementing electronic health records in Denmark. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(2), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stead, W. W., Kelly, B. J., & Kolodner, R. M. (2005). Achievable steps toward building a national health information infrastructure in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(2), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kevin, C.W. (2010). Accelerating innovation in information and communication technology for health. Health Affairs, 29(2), 2789–283.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gil-Garcìa, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Coiera, E. (1999). The impact of culture on technology… how do we create a clinical culture of innovation. Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 508–509.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Berg, M. (1999). Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55(2), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    FederSanità ANCI (2010). Ricerca sui Livelli di Innovazione Tecnologica in Sanità (LITIS). Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    ERA Project (2007b). eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Italy, Retrieved from. http://www.ehealth-era.org/publications/publications.htm.
  53. 53.
    Commission, European. (2007). eHealth taskforce report 2007-accelerating the development of the eHealth market in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Rome III “Federico Caffè”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations