Offline and Online Communities: Great Differences and Some Similarities

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 1)

Abstract

The concept of community has evolved considerably: from an essentially closed, spontaneous community based blood ties, space sharing, and spiritual connection to a planned community without clear borders. Due to the online communication phenomenon a traditional society is superseded by a virtual society. A society that is innovative because it involves a variety of cultures with their richness and diversity, and it is advanced because it requires ways of interactions that differ from the ones typical of traditional life. Then, can ICT create a real society? This is one of the questions at stake and the origin of the necessity to investigate online community. Further, does it reproduce the characteristics of a traditional community? An analysis of main organizational forms that typify the net suggests something different and community is representative only of a small number of such social groupings and a more precise terminology is necessary to identify them.

Keywords

Online community Offline community Transactions cost approach Governance structures Collective action 

References

  1. 1.
    Walsh, D. F. (1998). Structure/agency. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Core sociological dichotomies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tonnies, F. (1955). Community and association: (Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society; an outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fernback, J. (1997). The indivividual within the collective: Virtual ideology and the realization of collective principles. In S. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 36–54). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simmel, G. (1972). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandel, M. J. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilkins, A. L., & Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between Culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 468–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ciborra, C. (1990). Mimeo. Bologna: University of Bologna.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boisot, M. (1995). Information space: A framework for learning in organizations. London: Institutions and Culture. Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the network society. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marinelli, A. (2004). Connessioni. Nuovi media, nuove relazioni sociali. Milano: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rheingold, H. (1992). Virtual reality. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wellman, B. (1998). Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luke, T. (1993). Community and ecology. In S. Walker (Ed.), Changing community: The Graywolf annual ten (pp. 207–221). St. Paul: Graywolf Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turkle, S. (2009). Simulation and its discontents. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kallinikos, J. (2011). Bureaucracy under Siege: On information, collaboration and networks. In: S. R. Clegg, M. Harris, H. Hopfl (eds) Managing modernity: Beyond bureaucracy? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2006). Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance. Organization Studies, 27(10), 1447–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112(3), 369–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cersi—Luiss “Guido Carli” UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations