Towards the Redesign of e-Business Maturity Models for SMEs

Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 1)


This paper shows the results of the conceptual part of a research aimed at redesigning e-business stage models for small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). The literature review shows that these models are based mostly on a techno-centric perspective and are rather mechanistic in their approach to the development of e-business in smaller firms. Based on design science—which offers a methodology capable of understanding business needs deriving from the interplay of people, organization and technology—a non-linear stage model for the development of e-business in SMEs is proposed. Different levels of interaction in the exchange of information between a firm and its suppliers and customers characterize e-business: the model includes four levels and it outlines their main organizational implications. The model is not meant to be prescriptive, that is it is not intended to serve as an evaluation ladder for public administrations deciding to grant financial support to SMEs investing in e-business. Rather, it has an interpretive, organizational character: (i) entrepreneurs can be supported in their understanding and evaluation of the organizational needs connected with the exploitation of a given opportunity by means of different levels of digital interaction and (ii) policy makers can be guided in promoting the appropriate support (e.g.: training and advisory services) to different kinds of SMEs.


e-Business SMEs Maturity model Non-linear stage model 


  1. 1.
    Levenburg, N. M., Magal, S. R. (2005). Applying importance-performance analysis to evaluate E-business strategies among small firms. E-service Journal, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnston, D. A., Wade, M., & Mcclean, R. (2007). Does e-Business matter to SMEs? A comparison of the financial impacts of internet North American SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raymond, L., & Bergeron, F. (2008). Enabling the business strategy of SMEs through e-business capabilities: A strategic alignment perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108, 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010). Firms patterns of e-business adoption: Evidence for the European Union-27. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13, 47–56.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kapurubandara, M., Lawson, R. (2007). SMEs in developing countries need support to address the challenges of adopting e-Commerce technologies. 20th Bled eConference.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magal, S. R., Koslage, P., Levenburg, N. M. (2008). Towards a stage model for e-Business adoption among SMEs: Preliminary results for manufacturing and service firms. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao, S. S., Metts, G., Monge, C. A. M. (2003). Electronic commerce development in small and medium sized enterprises: A stage model and its implications. Business Process Management Journal, 9, 11–32.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alonso-Mendo, F., Fitzgerald, G., & Frias-Martinez, E. (2009). Understanding web site redesigns in small—and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): A U.K.-based study on the applicability of e-commerce stage models. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2003). Exploring SME internet adoption: Towards a contingent model. Electronic Markets, 13, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems reserach. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poeppelbuss, J., Niehaves, B., Simons, A., & Becker, J. (2011). Maturity models in information systems research: Literature search and analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29, 505–532.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beckinsale, M., & Ram, M. (2006). Delivering ICT to ethnic minority businesses: An action-research approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poon, S., & Swatman, P. M. (1999). An exploratory study of small business Internet commerce issues. Information & Management, 35, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willcocks, L., & Sauer, C. (2000). Associates: Moving to e-business. London: Random House Business Books.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, L. M., & Matlay, H. (2001). “Blanket” approaches to promoting ICT in small firms: Some lessons from the DTI ladder adoption model in the UK. Internet Research, 11, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaston, I., Badger, B., Mangles, T., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The internet and e-commerce: An opportunity to examine organisational learning in progress in small manufacturing firms? International Small Business Journal, 19, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., & Wenn, A. (2005). Maturity in the websites of Australian wineries: A study of varying website content. International journal of electronic business, 3, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daniel, E., & Wilson, H. (2002). Adoption of e-commerce by SMEs in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 20, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, M., & Murphy, A. (2004). SMEs and e-business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zheng, J. (2004). Small firms and e-business: cautiousness, contingency and cost-benefit. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodgers, J. A., Yen, D. C., Chou, D. C. (2002). Developing e-business; a strategic approach. Information Management & Computer Security, 10, 184–192.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robeiro, F. L., & Love, P. E. D. (2003). Value creation through an e-business strategy: Implication for SMEs in construction. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 3, 3–14.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fillis, I., Johansson, U., & Wagner, B. (2004). A qualitative investigation of smaller firm e-business development. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (1999). The virtual enterprise concept. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos & H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), Infrastructures for virtual enterprises: networking industrial enterprises (pp. 3–14). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-computer interaction, 15, 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oh, H., Curley, S. P., Subramani, M. R. (2008). The death of distance? The influence of computer mediated communication on perceptions of distance. ICIS 2008 ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schultze, U., Hiltz, S. R., Nardi, B., Rennecker, J., & Stucky, S. (2008). Using synthetic worlds for work and learning. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 351–370.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Davern, M. J. (1996). When good fit is bad: The dynamics of perceived fit. Seventeenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems ICIS96. pp. 112–121.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Feeny, D. F., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39, 9–21.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bassellier, G., & Reich, B. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. of management. Information, 17, 159–182.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2003). Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2003). Exploring SME internet adoption: Towards a contingent model. Electronic Markets, 13, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California: California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CeRSI – LUISS Guido Carli UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations