Skip to main content

On Dependence in Second-Order Probability

  • Conference paper
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7520))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a notion, relative independence, that models independence in relation to a predicate. The intuition is to capture the notion of a minimum of dependencies among variables with respect to the predicate. We prove that relative independence coincides with conditional independence only in a trivial case. For use in second-order probability, we let the predicate express first-order probability, i.e. that the probability variables must sum to one in order to restrict dependency to the necessary relation between probabilities of exhaustive and mutually exclusive events. We then show examples of Dirichlet distributions that do and do not have the property of relative independence. These distributions are compared with respect to the impact of further dependencies, apart from those imposed by the predicate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Walley, P.: Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 24, 125–148 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Levi, I.: The enterprise of knowledge. The MIT press (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cozman, F.G.: Credal networks. Artificial Intelligence 120, 199–233 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Parry, G.W.: The characterization of uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessments of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 54, 119–126 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karlsson, A.: Evaluating Credal Set Theory as a Belief Framework in High-Level Information Fusion for Automated Decision-Making. PhD thesis, Örebro University, School of Science and Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekenberg, L., Thorbiörnson, J.: Second-order decision analysis. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(1), 13–38 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Utkin, L.V., Augustin, T.: Decision making with imprecise second-order probabilities. In: ISIPTA 2003 - Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, pp. 547–561 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nau, R.F.: Uncertainty aversion with second-order utilities and probabilities. Management Science 52(1), 136–145 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnborg, S.: Robust Bayesianism: Relation to evidence theory. Journal of Advances in Information Fusion 1(1), 63–74 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cozman, F.: Decision Making Based on Convex Sets of Probability Distributions: Quasi-Bayesian Networks and Outdoor Visual Position Estimation. PhD thesis, The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson, A., Johansson, R., Andler, S.F.: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian and Credal Set Theory for Discrete State Estimation. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. CCIS, vol. 80, pp. 80–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelsen, R.B.: An introduction to copulas. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 139. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sundgren, D., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M.: Shifted dirichlet distributions as second-order probability distributions that factors into marginals. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, pp. 405–410 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard, J.M.: An introduction to the imprecise dirichlet model for multinomial data. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 39(2-3), 123–150 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Perks, W.: Some observations on inverse probability including a new indifference rule (with discussion). J. Inst. Actuaries 73, 285–334 (1947)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeffreys, H.: Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sundgren, D., Karlsson, A. (2012). On Dependence in Second-Order Probability. In: Hüllermeier, E., Link, S., Fober, T., Seeger, B. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7520. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33361-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33362-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics