Advertisement

The Role of Science and Technology Parks in the Generation of Firm Level Social Capital Through University–Firm Relations: An Empirical Study in Spain

  • Juan J. Jimenez-MorenoEmail author
  • Ricardo Martínez-Cañas
  • Pablo Ruiz-Palomino
  • Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Nowadays, science and technology parks (STPs) generally represent a kind of public–private partnerships that are designed to foster knowledge flows, mainly among park firms, as well as between these firms and external R&D institutions, and thus improve regional economic growth (Link and Scott 2007). Despite there is no official definition of what is an STP, some common denominators across different existing models suggest a set of minimum standards and requirements that any knowledge cluster should have to earn this formal recognition (Link 2009).

Keywords

Social Capital Partial Little Square Firm Performance Knowledge Acquisition Average Variance Extract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler P, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev 27(1):17–40Google Scholar
  2. Barclay D, Higgins C, Thompson R (1995) The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol Stud 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
  3. Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):9–120Google Scholar
  4. Blyler M, Coff RW (2003) Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strateg Manag J 24(7):677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bueno-Campos E, Rodríguez-Pomeda J (2007) On knowledge, networks, social capital and trust in innovation environments. Int J Entrepreneurship Innov Manag 7(6):575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment, Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 7–17Google Scholar
  8. Chakrabarti AK, Santoro MD (2004) Building social capital and learning environment in university – industry relationships. Int J Learn Intellect Capital 1(1):19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin W (1998) The Partial Least Squares approach to structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp 295–336Google Scholar
  10. Chin WW (2003) PLS-Graph, Version 3.00 (Build 1130). University of Houston, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  11. Chin W (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Esposito Vinzi V, Chin W, Hensler J, Wold H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 655–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A Partial Least Squares latent variable modelling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res 14(2):189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooke P (2007) Social capital, embeddedness, and market interactions: an analysis of firm performance in UK regions. Rev Soc Econ. doi: 10.1080/00346760601132170
  14. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and resources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–679Google Scholar
  15. Etzkowitz H (2008) The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2008) Regional research intensive clusters and science parks. In: Saublens C (ed) European research area: research programmes and capacity. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. Falk RF, Miller NB (1992) A primer for soft modelling. The University Of Akron Press, AkronGoogle Scholar
  18. Farr J (2004) Social capital: a conceptual history. Polit Theory 32(1):6–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strateg Manag J 21(3):203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansson F (2007) Science parks as knowledge organizations: the “ba” in action? Eur J Innov Manag 10(3):348–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansson F, Husted K, Vestergaard J (2005) Second generation science parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation 25(9):1039–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee R (2009) Social capital and business and management: setting a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 11(3):247–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesser EL (2000) Leveraging social capital in organizations. In: Lesser EL (ed) Knowledge and social capital: foundations and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Link AN (2009) Research, science, and technology parks: an overview of the academic literature. In: Wessner CW (ed) Understanding research, science and technology parks: global best practice: report of a symposium for the National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 127–139Google Scholar
  26. Link AN, Scott JT (2007) The economics of university research parks. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 23:661–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martínez-Cañas R, Ruiz-Palomino P, Sáez-Martínez FJ (2011) A literature review of the effect of science and technology parks on firm performance: a new model of value creation through social capital. Afr J Bus Manag 5(30):11999–12007Google Scholar
  28. Martínez-Cañas R, Sáez-Martínez FJ, Ruiz-Palomino P (2012) Knowledge acquisition’s mediation of social capital-firm innovation. J Knowledge Manag 16(1):61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Admin Sci Q 51(2):262–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nahapiet J (2008) Social capital and interorganizational relations. In: Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring PS (eds) The Oxford handbook of interorganizational relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 580–606Google Scholar
  31. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):242–266Google Scholar
  32. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Q 41(1):116–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scillitoe JL, Chakrabarti A (2009) A conceptual model of the incubation of new technology-based ventures: a social capital perspective. Rev Int Comp Manag 10(3):468–482Google Scholar
  34. Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behaviour: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manag J 41(4):464–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. von Hippel E (1988) The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werts CE, Linn RL, Joreskog KG (1974) Interclass reliability estimates: testing structural assumptions. Educ Psychol Meas 34(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Westlund H (2006) Social capital in the knowledge economy. Theory and empirics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schröder G, van Oppen C (2009) Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q 33(1):177–195Google Scholar
  41. Wiedman KG, Hennings N (2006) Corporate social capital and corporate reputations. In: 10th conference on reputation, image, identity & competitiveness, New York, 25–28 May 2006Google Scholar
  42. Wold H (1980) Model construction and evaluation when theoretical knowledge is scarce: theory and application of PLS. In: Kmenta J, Ramsey JB (eds) Evaluation of econometric models. Academic, New York, pp 47–74Google Scholar
  43. Wu F, Cavusgil ST (2006) Organizational learning, commitment, and joint value creation in interfirm relationships. J Bus Res 59(1):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu W (2008) Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: the mediating role of information sharing. J Manag Stud 45(1):122–146Google Scholar
  45. Ye F (2005) Strategic partnerships in transformational outsourcing as a distinctive source of is value: a social capital perspective. Unpublished Dissertation, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  46. Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza H (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in technology-based new firms. Strateg Manag J 22(6–7):587–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zahra SA (2010) Harvesting family firms' organizational social capital: a relational perspective. J Manag Stud 47(2):345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zheng W (2010) A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: where is empirical literature directing us? Int J Manag Rev 12(2):151–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan J. Jimenez-Moreno
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ricardo Martínez-Cañas
    • 2
  • Pablo Ruiz-Palomino
    • 2
  • Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. Administración EmpresasFtad. Económicas Y EmpresarialesAlbaceteSpain
  2. 2.Dpto. Administración EmpresasFtad. Ciencias SocialesCuencaSpain

Personalised recommendations