FactForge: Data Service or the Diversity of Inferred Knowledge over LOD

  • Mariana Damova
  • Kiril Simov
  • Zdravko Tashev
  • Atanas Kiryakov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7557)

Abstract

Linked Open Data movement is maturing. LOD cloud increases by billions of triples yearly. Technologies and guidelines about how to produce LOD fast, how to assure their quality, and how to provide vertical oriented data services are being developed (LOD2, LATC, baseKB). Little is said however about how to include reasoning in the LOD framework, and about how to cope with its diversity. This paper deals with this topic. It presents a data service – FactForge – the biggest body of general knowledge from LOD on which inference is performed. It has close to 16B triples available for querying, derived from about 2B explicit triples, after inference and some OWLIM repository specific optimization. We discuss the impacts of the reference layer of FactForge and inference on the diversity of the web of data, and argue for a new paradigm of data services based on linked data verticals, and on inferred knowledge.

Keywords

Linked Open Data Linked Data Management FactForge reference layer upper level ontology PROTON Semantic Web 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Bergman, M.K.: Seeking a Semantic Web Sweet Spot. Blog post (2011), Retrieved from http://www.mkbergman.com/946/seeking-a-semantic-web-sweet-spot
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Bishop, B., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Peikov, I., Tashev, Z., Velkov, R.: OWLIM: A family of scalable semantic repositories. Semantic Web Journal. Special Issue: real-World Applications of OWL (2011); Hitzler, P. (ed.)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bishop, B., Kiryakov, A., Tashev, Z., Damova, M., Simov, K.: OWLIM Reasoning over FactForge. In: Proceedings of OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop (ORE 2012), Collocated with IJCAR 2012, Manchester, UK (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CIA The World Factbook (2011), Retrieved 2011 from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
  7. 7.
    Damova, M., Kiryakov, A., Grinberg, M., Bergman, M., Giasson, F., Simov, K.: Creation and Integration of Reference Ontologies for Efficient LOD Management. In: Stellato, A., Pazienza, M.T. (eds.) Semi-Automatic Ontology Development: Processes and Resources. IGI Global, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damova, M., Kiryakov, A., Simov, K., Petrov, S.: Mapping the Central LOD Ontologies to PROTON Upper-Level Ontology. In: Proceedings of Ontology Matching Workshop, International Semantic Web Conference, Shanghai, China (November 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DBpedia (2011), Retrieved from Structured information from Wikipedia, http://DBpedia.org
  10. 10.
    Dublin Core (2011), Retrieved 2011 from Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
  11. 11.
    FactForge (2011), Retrieved from A Reasonable View to the Web of Data, http://factforge.net, http://www.ontotext.com/factforge
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Freebase (2011), Retrieved from http://www.freebase.com/
  14. 14.
    Geonames (2011), Retrieved 2011 from A geographical database, http://www.geonames.org
  15. 15.
    Heim, P., Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Lohmann, S., Stegemann, T.: RelFinder: Revealing Relationships in RDF Knowledge Bases. In: Chua, T.-S., Kompatsiaris, Y., Mérialdo, B., Haas, W., Thallinger, G., Bailer, W. (eds.) SAMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5887, pp. 182–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jain, P., Yeh, P.Z., Verma, K., Vasquez, R.G., Damova, M., Hitzler, P., Sheth, A.P.: Contextual Ontology Alignment of LOD with an Upper Ontology: A Case Study with Proton. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 80–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiryakov, A., Momtchev, V.: Two Reason-able Views to the Web of Linked Data. Paper Presented at the Semantic Technology Conference, San Jose, USA (June 2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Velkov, R., Tashev, Z., Peikov, I.: LDSR: Materialized Reasonable View to the Web of Linked Data. In: Patel-Schneider, R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of OWLED 2009, Chantilly, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    MusicBrainz, community music metadatabase (2011), Retrieved 2011 from http://musicbrainz.org
  23. 23.
    New York Times Linked Open Data (2011), Retrieved 2011 from http://data.nytimes.com/
  24. 24.
    OWLIM (2011), Retrieved from http://www.ontotext.com/owlim
  25. 25.
    PROTON 3.0, PROTON 3.0 Documentation. Sofia, Bulgaria (2011), http://www.ontotext.com/proton-ontology
  26. 26.
    Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Recommendation (January 15, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Simple Knowledge Organization System (2011), Retrieved fromhttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/
  30. 30.
    ter Horst, H.J.: Combining RDF and Part of OWL with Rules: Semantics, Decidability, Complexity. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 668–684. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Upper Mapping and Binding Exchange Layer (UMBEL) (2011), Retrieved from http://www.umbel.org/
  32. 32.
    Wordnet (2011) Retrieved from A lexical database for English, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariana Damova
    • 1
  • Kiril Simov
    • 1
  • Zdravko Tashev
    • 1
  • Atanas Kiryakov
    • 1
  1. 1.OntotextSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations