Advertisement

BPMN Research: What We Know and What We Don’t Know

  • Jan Recker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 125)

Abstract

In this short keynote paper, I will briefly explore the current state of research and practice surrounding the BPMN standard. On basis of this analysis I will offer a personal outlook into the key emerging areas where I believe more research will be required to further understand BPMN, its premise and promise, and how we can shape – and join together – the landscape of BPMN practice and development in academia and industry.

Keywords

BPMN process modeling Known Unknowns empirical research design research research agenda 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arazy, O., Kumar, N., Shapira, B.: A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11, 455–490 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and Analysis of Business Process Models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology 50, 1281–1294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Figl, K., Derntl, M.: The Impact of Perceived Cognitive Effectiveness on Perceived Usefulness of Visual Conceptual Modeling Languages. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 78–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher 33, 14–26 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wohed, P., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Managing Process Model Complexity via Concrete Syntax Modifications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7, 255–265 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller, R., Rogge-Solti, A.: BPMN for Healthcare Processes. In: 3rd Central-European Workshop on Services and their Composition, pp. 65–72. CEUR-WS.org, Karlsruhe (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) - Version 2.0. Object Management Group (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
  8. 8.
    Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: From Business Process Models to Process-Oriented Software Systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology 19, 2–37 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pullum, G.K.: Language Log: No Foot in Mouth (2003), http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000182.html
  10. 10.
    Recker, J.: Opportunities and Constraints: The Current Struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal 16, 181–201 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Recker, J., Dreiling, A.: The Effects of Content Presentation Format and User Characteristics on Novice Developers’ Understanding of Process Models. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28, 65–84 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: A BPMN Extension for the Modeling of Security Requirements in Business Processes. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems 90, 745–752 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, L., Ruiz, F., Garcia, F., Cardoso, J.: Towards Thresholds of Control Flow Complexity Measures for BPMN Models. In: 26th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1445–1450. ACM, TaiChung (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style: A Levels-based Methodology for BPM Process Modeling and Improvement Using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An Analytical Evaluation of BPMN Using a Semiotic Quality Framework. In: Castro, J., Teniente, E. (eds.) CAiSE 2005 Workshops, vol. 1, pp. 533–544. FEUP, Porto (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring Large Process Model Repositories. Computers in Industry 62, 467–486 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    White, S.A.: Introduction to BPMN. BPMI.org (2006), http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/Introduction%20to%20BPMN.pdf
  21. 21.
    White, S.A., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide. Future Strategies, Lighthouse Point (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolter, C., Schaad, A.: Modeling of Task-based Authorization Constraints in BPMN. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    zur Muehlen, M., Ho, D.T.-Y.: Service Process Innovation: A Case Study of BPMN in Practice. In: Sprague Jr., R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 41th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 372. IEEE, Waikoloa (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Recker
    • 1
  1. 1.Retail Innovation Information Systems School Science & Engineering FacultyAustralia

Personalised recommendations