Comparison of Fuzzy Logic Based and Sliding Mode Based Controller for IM Drive Fed by Matrix Converter

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 189)

Abstract

Modern electric drive can be comprehended as electro mechanic energy changer. The own change of electric energy to the mechanic energy is done by the electric motor. It needs for the demanded conversion proper voltage, currents or frequency on its terminals. In case of higher demands, like high dynamics of the motor is required, the converter is usually connected in front of the motor. Due to their robustness and durability recently induction machines are used in modern regulated drives. To gain maximal performance from the induction machine is the research also focused on the so called all silicon converter solutions like matrix converter. From the point of control algorithm the the Direct Torque Control (DTC) is one of the most common high performance induction motor control methods nowadays. This paper compares two modern controller approaches for realization of DTC IM drive fed by matrix converter.

Keywords

Matrix Converter Induction Machine Direct Torque Control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kolar, J.W., Friedli, T., Rodriguez, J., Wheeler, P.W.: Review of three-phase PWM AC–AC converter topologies. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58(11), 4988–5006 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rodriguez, J., Rivera, M., Kolar, J.W., Wheeler, P.W.: A Review of Control and Modulation Methods for Matrix Converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 59(1), 58–70 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vas, P.: Sensorless vector and direct torque control. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Depenbrock, M.: Direct Self Control of Inverter-Fed Induction Machines. Proceedings of the Part I/II, IEEE Trans. Systems Man. Cybernetics 20, 404–435 (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brandstetter, P., Hrdina, L., Simonik, P.: Properties of selected direct torque control methods of induction motor. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp. 1456–1461 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fligl, S., Bauer, J., Vlcek, M., Lettl, J.: Analysis of Induction Machine T and Γ Circuit Coequality for Use in Electric Drive Controllers. In: 13th Int. Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, OPTIM 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fligl, S., Bauer, J., Ryvkin, S.: Matrix Converter Sliding Mode Based Control for Induction Motor Drive. In: 13th Int. Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment, OPTIM 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Utkin, V.I., Gldner, J., Shi, J.: Sliding mode control in electromechanical system. Taylor & Francis, London (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryvkin, S., Schmidt-Obermoeller, R., Steimel, A.: Sliding-Mode-Based Control for a Three-Level Inverter Drive. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics 55(11), 3828–3835 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, C.C.: Fuzzy Logic in Control Systems: Fuzzy Logic Controller. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 3(4), 420–429Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilfried, H., Michael, K.: Fuzzy logic-based control of flux and torque in AC-drives. In: First IEEE Conference on Control Applications (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Department of Electric Drives and TractionCzech Technical University in PraguePrague 6Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations