Advertisement

Simulation Analysis of Static and Dynamic Intermediate Nodes and Performance Comparison of MANETS Routing Protocols

  • Jahangir Khan
  • Zoran Bojkovic
  • Syed Irfan Hayder
  • Gulam Ali Mallah
  • Abdul Haseeb
  • Fariha Atta
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 189)

Abstract

Mobile ad hoc networks are self-configuring and self-organizing wireless networks with no infrastructure in which mobile nodes cooperate in a friendly manner for multi-hop forwarding. Due to the mobile nature of the nodes in mobile ad hoc networks, the applications of these networks are diverse, ranging from home networking to intelligent transport, military exercises and campus network. However, this mobility of nodes makes the network vulnerable to frequent topology changes. Consequently, routing in mobile ad hoc networks is much more complex than in other wireless networks. Here in this paper we proposed two reactive protocols i-e AODV and DSR, and to analyse the data delivery ratio of static and dynamic intermediate nodes as well as source to destination in campus networks and also to compare the global and object statistics as well as recent simulated statistics of both reactive protocols. We also compare the global and object simulation statistics to get best results during simulation with different metrics in simulation of DSR and AODV routing protocols. Here we suggest that the combined performance of both protocols make a very strong performance contribution in ad hoc networks using OPNET simulator. Results also shows that 3G ad-hoc can make a very strong contribution towards 4G cellular networks for our future generation.

Keywords

MANETS DSR AODV Data throughput in campus network Performance 3G/4G 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta, A.K., Member, IACSIT, Sadawarti, H., Verma, A.K.: Performance analysis of AODV, DSR & TORA Routing Protocols. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2(2) (April 2010) ISSN: 1793‐ 8236Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett, C., Marathe, A., Marathe, M.V., Drozda, M.: Characterizing the interaction between routing and MAC protocols in ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing (MobiHoc 2002), ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Royer, E.M., Toh, C.-K.: A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 46–55 (April 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broch, J., Maltz, D.A., Johnson, D.B., Hu, Y.-C., Jetcheva, J.: A Performance Comparison of Multi- Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. In: ACM Mobicom (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frodigh, M., Johansson, P., Larsson, P.: Wireless Ad Hoc Networking –The Art of Networking without a Network. Ericsson Review 77(4), 248–263 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Misra, R., Manda, C.R.: Performance Comparison of AODV/DSR On demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks in Constrained Situation. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (India)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Das, S.R., Perkins, C.E., Royer, E.M.: Performance Comparison of Two on demand Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 3–12 (March 2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kenjiro, Cho, Philippe, Jacquet: Technologies for Advanced Heterogeneous network, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szczodrak, M., Kim, J., Baek, Y.: 4GM@4GW: Implementing 4G in the Military Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Environment. IJCSNS Int. 70 International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 7(4) (April 2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halgamuge, K.S., Wang, P.L.: Classification and Clustering for Knowledge Discovery, 1st edn. Springer, Netherlands (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    khan, J.: MANET Reactive Protocols-Tutorial Review. International Journal of Computer Applications 12(4), 5–7 (2010) (Published By Foundation of Computer Science )CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, J., Khattak, D.N.S., Jan, H.: A step of Mobile Ad-Hoc on-demand Routing Protocols towards 4G Cellular networks. International Journal of Computer Applications 16(6), 20–24 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan, J., Abas, A., Khan, K.: Cellular Handover approaches in 2.5G to 5G Technology. International Journal of Computer Application  21(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan, J., Hayder, S.I.: A Comprehensive Performance Comparison of On-Demand Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. In: Kim, T.-h., Vasilakos, T., Sakurai, K., Xiao, Y., Zhao, G., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) FGCN 2010. CCIS, vol. 120, pp. 354–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, J., Bojkovic, Z.S., Marwat, M.I.K.: Emerging of Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks and New Generation Technology for Best QOS and 5G Technology. In: Kim, T.-h., Adeli, H., Fang, W.-c., Vasilakos, T., Stoica, A., Patrikakis, C.Z., Zhao, G., Villalba, J.G., Xiao, Y. (eds.) FGCN 2011, Part I. CCIS, vol. 265, pp. 198–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corchado, E., Herrero, Á.: Neural visualization of network traffic data for intrusion detection. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(2), 2042–2056 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, H., Abraham, A., Snásel, V., McLoone, S.F.: Swarm scheduling approaches for work-flow applications with security constraints in distributed data-intensive computing environments. Inf. Sci. 192, 228–243 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrero, Á., Zurutuza, U., Corchado, E.: A Neural-Visualization IDS for Honeynet Data. Int. J. Neural Syst. 22(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Panda, M., Abraham, A., Das, S., Patra, M.R.: Network intrusion detection system: A machine learning approach. Intelligent Decision Technologies 5(4), 347–356 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jahangir Khan
    • 1
  • Zoran Bojkovic
    • 2
  • Syed Irfan Hayder
    • 3
  • Gulam Ali Mallah
    • 4
  • Abdul Haseeb
    • 1
  • Fariha Atta
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science & Information TechnologySarhad University of Science & ITPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.Faculty of Transport and Traffic EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringPAF-KIET, PAF Base KorangiCreek KarachiPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceShah Abdul Latif UniversityKhairPur SindhPakistan
  5. 5.FAST-National University of Computer & Emerging SciencesPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations