Advertisement

Oblivious Printing of Secret Messages in a Multi-party Setting

  • Aleksander Essex
  • Urs Hengartner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7397)

Abstract

We propose oblivious printing, a novel approach to document printing in which a set of printers can cooperate to print a secret message—in human or machine readable form—without learning the message. We present multi-party protocols for obliviously printing a secret in three settings: obliviously printing the contents of a ciphertext, obliviously printing a randomized message, and generating and obliviously printing a DSA/Elgamal keypair. We propose an approach to improving the legibility of messages in the presence of numerous participants. Finally we propose some potential applications of oblivious printing in the context of electronic voting and digital cash.

Keywords

Secret Message Encrypt Image Visual Cryptography Electronic Vote Translation Table 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adida, B., de Marneffe, O., Pereira, O., Quisquater, J.-J.: Electing a university president using open-audit voting: Analysis of real-world use of Helios. In: EVT/WOTE (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ateniese, G., Blundo, C., Santis, A.D., Stinson, D.R.: Visual cryptography for general access structures. Information and Computation 129, 86–106 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchanan, J.D.R., Cowburn, R.P., Jausovec, A.-V., Petit, D., Seem, P., Xiong, G., Atkinson, D., Fenton, K., Allwood, D.A., Bryan, M.T.: Fingerprinting documents and packaging. Nature 436, 475 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carback, R.T., Chaum, D., Clark, J., Conway, J., Essex, A., Hernson, P.S., Mayberry, T., Popoveniuc, S., Rivest, R.L., Shen, E., Sherman, A.T., Vora, P.L.: Scantegrity II municipal election at Takoma Park: the first E2E binding governmental election with ballot privacy. In: USENIX Security Symposium (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaum, D., Carback, R., Clark, J., Essex, A., Popoveniuc, S., Rivest, R.L., Ryan, P.Y.A., Shen, E., Sherman, A.T.: Scantegrity II: end-to-end verifiability for optical scan election systems using invisible ink confirmation codes. In: EVT (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaum, D., Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.: A Practical Voter-Verifiable Election Scheme. In: De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Syverson, P.F., Gollmann, D. (eds.) ESORICS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3679, pp. 118–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark, J., Hengartner, U.: Selections: Internet Voting with Over-the-Shoulder Coercion-Resistance. In: Danezis, G. (ed.) FC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7035, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarkson, W., Weyrich, T., Finkelstein, A., Heninger, N., Halderman, J.A., Felten, E.W.: Fingerprinting blank paper using commodity scanners. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cramer, R., Damgård, I., Nielsen, J.B.: Multiparty Computation from Threshold Homomorphic Encryption. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 280–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Essex, A., Clark, J., Hengartner, U., Adams, C.: How to print a secret. In: HotSec (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Essex, A., Henrich, C., Hengartner, U.: Single layer optical-scan voting with fully distributed trust. In: VOTE-ID (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiat, A., Shamir, A.: How to Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 186–194. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jakobsson, M., Juels, A.: Mix and Match: Secure Function Evaluation via Ciphertexts. In: Okamoto, T. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1976, pp. 162–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jakobsson, M., Juels, A., Rivest, R.L.: Making mix nets robust for electronic voting by randomized partial checking. In: USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 339–353 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Juels, A., Catalano, D., Jakobsson, M.: Coercion-resistant electronic elections. In: ACM WPES (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kafri, O., Keren, E.: Encryption of pictures and shapes by random grids. Optics Letters 12(6), 377–379 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, S.-S., Na, J.-C., Sohn, S.-W., Park, C., Seo, D.-H., Kim, S.-J.: Visual cryptography based on an interferometric encryption technique. ETRI 24(5), 373–380 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naor, M., Shamir, A.: Visual Cryptography. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neff, C.A.: Practical high certainty intent verification for encrypted votes. Technical report, VoteHere Whitepaper (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedersen, T.P.: A Threshold Cryptosystem without a Trusted Party. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 522–526. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Popoveniuc, S., Hosp, B.: An introduction to punchscan. In: WOTE (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan, P.Y.A., Teague, V.: Pretty good democracy. In: Workshop on Security Protocols (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sako, K., Kilian, J.: Receipt-Free Mix-Type Voting Scheme- a Practical Solution to the Implementation of a Voting Booth. In: Guillou, L.C., Quisquater, J.-J. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 1995. LNCS, vol. 921, pp. 393–403. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharma, A., Subramanian, L., Brewer, E.: Paperspeckle: Microscopic fingerprinting of paper. In: CCS (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tuyls, P., Hollmann, H.D.L., van Lint, J.H., Tolhuizen, L.: Xor-based visual cryptography schemes. Designs Codes and Cryptography 37, 169–186 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    United States Election Assistance Commission. 2008 election administration & voting survey report (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Viet, D.Q., Kurosawa, K.: Almost Ideal Contrast Visual Cryptography with Reversing. In: Okamoto, T. (ed.) CT-RSA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2964, pp. 353–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang, C.-N. (ed.): Visual Cryptography and Secret Image Sharing. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksander Essex
    • 1
  • Urs Hengartner
    • 1
  1. 1.Cheriton School of Computer ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations