Capabilities and Levels of Maturity in IT-Based Case Management

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7481)


We present the results of a case study where we compared the needs of case managers with the capabilities of case management software systems (CMS) in social work, health care, and the handling of complex claims in insurance. Building on existing maturity models, we relate capabilities with maturity levels and present the C3M maturity model for IT-based case management.

Whereas vendors of business process management suites (BPMS) argue that case management requires flexible process guidance and improved context-sensitive information handling, we identify case assessment and case similarity as key capabilities of future CMS. We show how these and other capabilities are implemented in CMS today and discuss future trends of how CMS capabilities will evolve further. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of CMS technology on the practice of case management in an organization.

Our results are beneficial for the evaluation of CMS. They support organizations in mastering levels of maturity when using CMS, help them exploiting their benefits and addressing associated risks. The results also help BPMS vendors in adding the ‘right’ case-management capabilities to their BPM software when addressing case-oriented work.


Case Management Business Process Maturity Model Maturity Level Business Process Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Davenport, T.H.: Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Mcgraw-Hill (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McLellan, A.T., et al.: Does clinical case management improve outpatient addiction treatment? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 55, 91–103 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ziguras, S.J., Stuart, G.W.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychatric Services 51(11), 1410–1421 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swenson, K.: Mastering The Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize The Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levin, R., Iansiti, M.: The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Mcgraw-Hill (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moxley, D.P.: Case management by design: reflections on principles and practices. Nelson-Hall Publishers (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kraft, F.M.: Improving knowledge work. In: Swenson, K. (ed.): Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done, pp. 181–210. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitzsimmons, J., Fitzsimmons, M.: Service Management - Operations, Strategy, Information Technology. McGraw Hill (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kie, T., Monzer, M.: Case Management und Soziale Dienste. In: Evers, A., Heinze, R.G. (eds.): Handbuch Soziale Dienste, pp. 499–515. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, D.M.: The business process maturity model - a practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization. BPTrends (September 2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruin, T.D., Rosemann, M.: Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Proc. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolf, C., Harmon, P.: The state of business process management. BP Trends (June 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melenovsky, M.J., Sinur, J.: BPM maturity model identifies six phases for successful BPM adoption. Research Report G00142643, Gartner (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 111–123 (April 2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Object Management Group: Business Process Maturity Model 1.0 (BPMM), OMG document number formal/2008-06-01 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Snabe, J.H., Rosenberg, A., Moller, C., Scavillo, M.: Business Process Management - the SAP Roadmap. SAP Press (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and TechnologyLucerne University of Applied Sciences and ArtsChina
  2. 2.School of Social WorkLucerne University of Applied Sciences and ArtsChina

Personalised recommendations