Good Governance in Global Supply Chains from Eight Perspectives

Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

The development of a reactive branch for “tomorrow’s logistics”, which considers itself to become an active leading authority, demands – especially under the conditions of permanent change – an agreement on Good Governance between those responsible for tasks of the supply chain management. Observations of behavior in business relations across small and medium sized companies indicate that the communication between varying actors about sustainable compliance with different demands is impeded by complex structures of the working reality. In a study based on several years of a participatory observation of significant actors at the interface of industry, forwarder and customs administration in the inland and abroad a model was developed that may assist professionals to gain an active “understanding of the other”. It shall facilitate the joint agreement on similarities and differences of the respective realms in which the participants of global supply networks work with each other while facing partly opposed interests. Using methods of comparative political research, reasons were discovered as to why cooperation under partial competition conditions is successful or not.

Keywords

behavioral pattern change competence governance innovation integration logistics other organization perspectives responsibility subjective reality supply chain supply network understanding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T.: Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag (1980); (Original: The Social Construction of Reality)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Todorov, T.: Die Eroberung Amerikas: Das Problem des Anderen. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lautenschläger, H.: Gestaltung globaler Logistiknetze mit dezentralen Kompetenzen, Projektbericht Nr. 4 des Verbundprojekts OrGoLo, Hg. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Institut für Produktion und Industrielles Informationsmanagement, Essen, p. 5 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lautenschläger, H.: Innovative Instrumente zur Gestaltung globaler Logistiknetze, Projektbericht Nr. 5 des Verbundprojekts OrGoLo, Hg. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Institut für Produktion und Industrielles Informationsmanagement, Essen, p. 9 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer, S., Fues, T., Messner, D., Weinlich, S.: Engagement für Entwicklung und Umwelt. Informationen zur politischen Bildung 310, 38 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Damkowski, W., Precht, C.: Public Management. Neuere Steuerungskonzepte für den öffentlichen Sektor, p. 205. Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Economic Commission for Europe, UN/CEFACT – Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business: Recommendation and Guidelines on establishing a Single Window (Recommendation No. 33). United Nations, New York/Geneva (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lautenschläger, H.: e-Logistics: International Net Work of Complementary Competences. Technical Report, 14th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Conference Chair: Joze Gricar. University of Maribor, Slovenia, p. 3 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gairing, F.: Organisationsentwicklung als Lernprozess von Menschen und Systemen, p. 15. Deutscher Studien Verlag, Weinheim (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bogumil, J., Kißler, L.: Verwaltungsmodernisierung als Machtspiel. In: Budäus, D., Conrad, P., Schreyögg, G. (eds.) Managementforschung 8, New Public Management, p. 9. Verlag Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Relamedia GmbHBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations