General Linguistics and Communication Sciences: Sociocomplexity as an Integrative Perspective

  • Albert Bastardas-Boada
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)


The paradigmatic revolutions in 20th-century demand that we reflect on our own paradigms in the light of the great changes in the other disciplines. The elements must not be represented as being outside those of the others, separate and independent, since the interdependencies and integrations are the foundation of reality. We need a dynamic ‘ecologization’ and ’complexification’ of thinking, in order to consider the contexts of phenomena in an integrated manner with the phenomena themselves. We are unlikely to be able to understand human behaviour if we do not bring the mind-brain into the foreground of our analyses, as it is where reality is perceived, processed cognitively and emotively, and where – consciously or otherwise – the courses of action that an individual takes are decided. A science that sees language not as an ‘object’ but from a (socio)complexity perspective has a much greater chance of succeeding in the task of making linguistic and communicative phenomena intelligible.


Mental Causation Linguistic Form Linguistic Structure Exact Science Linguistic Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bastardas i Boada, A.: Cap a un enfocament holístic per a la lingüística. In: Artigas, R., et al. (eds.) El significat textual, pp. 15–20. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Cultura, Barcelona (1995)Google Scholar
  2. Bastardas Boada, A.: Comunicación humana y paradigmas holísticos. Claves de razón práctica 51, 78–80 (1995b)Google Scholar
  3. Bastardas i Boada, A.: Ecologia de les llengües. Medi, contacte i dinàmica sociolingüística. Proa, Barcelona (1996)Google Scholar
  4. Bastardas Boada, A.: Lingüística general y teorías de la complejidad ecológica: algunas ideas desde una transdisciplinariedad sugerente. In: Fernández González, J., et al. (eds.) Lingüística para el siglo XXI, vol. I, pp. 287–294. Eds. Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca (1999)Google Scholar
  5. Bastardas Boada, A.: Lingüística y (psico)sociología: una interdisciplinariedad necesaria. QVR Quo Vadis Romania? – Zeitschrift für eine aktuelle Romanistik 28, 20–29 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. Bastardas-Boada, A.: Complejidad y emergencia en lingüística y ciencias de la comunicación. Glossa. An Ambilingual Interdisciplinary Journal 4(2), 312–330 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Barbalet, J.M.: Emotion, social theory, and social structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Bernárdez, E.: Teoría y epistemología del texto. Cátedra, Madrid (1995)Google Scholar
  9. Bohm, D.: La totalidad y el orden implicado [Wholeness and the implicate order, 1980]. Kairós, Barcelona (1987)Google Scholar
  10. Bohm, D., Peat, D.F.: Science, order, and creativity. Routledge, London (1989)Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P.: La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris (1979)Google Scholar
  12. Capra, F.: El punto crucial [The turning point, 1982]. Integral, Barcelona (1985)Google Scholar
  13. Capra, F.: The web of life. A new synthesis of mind and matter. HarperCollins, London (1997)Google Scholar
  14. Castellani, B., Hafferty, F.: Sociology and complexity science. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N.: New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Damasio, A.: The feeling of what happens. Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. Vintage Books, London (2000)Google Scholar
  17. De Bono, E.: Water logic. Penguin Books, London (1994)Google Scholar
  18. Elias, N.: Norbert Elias par lui-même (Interview biographique de Norbert Elias par A. J. Heerma van Voss et A. van Stolk). Fayard, Paris (1991)Google Scholar
  19. Einstein, A.: Lettres à Maurice Solvine. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1969)Google Scholar
  20. Eve, R.A., Horsfall, S., Lee, M.E.: Chaos, complexity and sociology. SAGE, London (1997)Google Scholar
  21. Flos, J.: Ordre i caos en ecologia. Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona (1995)Google Scholar
  22. Gell-Mann, M.: El Quark y el jaguar. Aventuras en lo simple y lo complejo. Tusquets, Barcelona (1996)Google Scholar
  23. Holland, J.H.: Hidden order. How adaptation builds complexity. Basic Books, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  24. Holland, J.H.: Emergence. From chaos to order. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Holton, G.: La imaginación científica. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico (1985)Google Scholar
  26. Jörg, T.: New thinking in complexity for the social sciences and humanities. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lugan, J.-C.: La systémique sociale. PUF, Paris (1993)Google Scholar
  28. Margalef, R.: Teoría de los sistemas ecológicos. Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona (1991)Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, I., Zohar, D.: Who’s afraid of Schrödinger’s cat?. Quill, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  30. McGilchrist, I.: The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale University Press, New Haven (2009)Google Scholar
  31. Morin, E.: La méthode. vol. 2. La vie de la vie. Seuil, Paris (1980)Google Scholar
  32. Morin, E.: La méthode, 4. Les idées. Leur habitat, leur vie, leurs moeurs, leur organisation. Ed. du Seuil, Paris (1991)Google Scholar
  33. Morin, E.: Introduction à la pensée complexe. ESF, Paris (1992)Google Scholar
  34. Morin, E.: La tête bien faite. Repenser la réforme, réformer la pensé. Seuil, Paris (1999)Google Scholar
  35. Morin, E.: L’intelligence de la complexité. In: Spire, A. (ed.) Entretien avec Edgar Morin, pp. 169–178 (1999b)Google Scholar
  36. Morin, E.: La méthode, vol. 5. L’identité humaine. Seuil, Paris (2001)Google Scholar
  37. Morin, E.: La méthode, vol. 6. Éthique. Seuil, Paris (2004)Google Scholar
  38. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Entre le temps et l’éternité. Flammarion, Paris (1992)Google Scholar
  39. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Gallimard, Paris (1996)Google Scholar
  40. Searle, J.: Mentes, cerebros y ciencia [Minds, brains and science, 1984]. Cátedra, Madrid (1985)Google Scholar
  41. Spire, A.: La pensée-Prigogine. Desclée de Brouwer, Paris (1999)Google Scholar
  42. Talbot, M.: Misticismo y física moderna [Mysticism and the New Physics, 1980]. Kairós, Barcelona (1986)Google Scholar
  43. Turner, F.: Chaos and social science. In: Eve, R.A., Horsfall, S., Lee, M.E. (eds.) Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models and Theories, pp. 11–27. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1997)Google Scholar
  44. Varela, F., Thompson, J.E., Rosch, E.: The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  45. Vilarroya, O.: La disolución de la mente. Tusquets ed., Barcelona (2002)Google Scholar
  46. Von Bertalanffy, L.: Teoría general de los sistemas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México (1981)Google Scholar
  47. Wagensberg, J.: Ideas sobre la complejidad del mundo. Tusquets, Barcelona (1985)Google Scholar
  48. Waldrop, M.M.: Complexity. Penguin, London (1992)Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, E.O.: Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. Abacus, London (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Bastardas-Boada
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament of General Linguistics, Complexity, Communication and Sociolinguistics Group, CUSC – University Center of Sociolinguistics and CommunicationUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations