Advertisement

Opinion Mining on a German Corpus of a Media Response Analysis

  • Thomas Scholz
  • Stefan Conrad
  • Lutz Hillekamps
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7499)

Abstract

This contribution introduces a new corpus of a German Media Response Analysis called the pressrelations dataset which can be used in several tasks of Opinion Mining: Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Extraction and the determination of viewpoints. Professional Media Analysts created a corpus of 617 documents which contains 1,521 statements. The statements are annotated with a tonality (positive, neutral, negative) and two different viewpoints. In our experiments, we perform sentiment classifications by machine learning techniques which are based on different methods to calculate tonality.

Keywords

Corpora and Language Resources Media Response Analysis Sentiment Analysis Opinion Extraction Viewpoint Determination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Church, K.W., Hanks, P.: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. In: Proc. of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL, ACL 1989, pp. 76–83 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Web Data Mining, WSDM 2008, pp. 231–240 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greene, S., Resnik, P.: More than words: syntactic packaging and implicit sentiment. In: Proc. of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conf. of the North American Chapter of the ACL, NAACL 2009, pp. 503–511 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harb, A., Plantié, M., Dray, G., Roche, M., Trousset, F., Poncelet, P.: Web opinion mining: how to extract opinions from blogs? In: Proc. of the 5th Intl. Conf. on Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology, CSTST 2008, pp. 211–217 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proc. of the 10th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2004, pp. 168–177 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaji, N., Kitsuregawa, M.: Building lexicon for sentiment analysis from massive collection of html documents. In: Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Momtazi, S.: Fine-grained german sentiment analysis on social media. In: Proc. of the 9th Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proc. of the 42nd Meeting of the ACL, pp. 271–278 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2), 1–135 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, S., Lee, K., Song, J.: Contrasting opposing views of news articles on contentious issues. In: Proc. of the 49th Annual Meeting of the ACL: Human Language Technologies, HLT 2011, vol. 1, pp. 340–349 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remus, R., Quasthoff, U., Heyer, G.: Sentiws – a publicly available German-language resource for sentiment analysis. In: Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarvabhotla, K., Pingali, P., Varma, V.: Sentiment classification: a lexical similarity based approach for extracting subjectivity in documents. Inf. Retr. 14(3), 337–353 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In: Proc. of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, CAAGET 2010, pp. 116–124 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watson, T., Noble, P.: Evaluating public relations: a best practice guide to public relations planning, research & evaluation. PR in practice series, ch. 6, pp. 107–138. Kogan Page (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2-3), 165–210 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 35(3), 399–433 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Scholz
    • 1
  • Stefan Conrad
    • 1
  • Lutz Hillekamps
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceHeinrich-Heine-UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Editorial Department & Media AnalysispressrelationsDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations