Skip to main content

Aligning Business Process Models and Domain Knowledge: A Meta-modeling Approach

  • Conference paper
Advances in Databases and Information Systems

Abstract

In recent years the problems related to modeling and improving business processes have been of growing interest. Indeed, companies are realizing the undeniable impact of a better understanding and management of business processes (BP) on the effectiveness, consistency, and transparency of their business operations. BP modeling aims at a better understanding of processes, allowing deciders to achieve strategic goals of the company. However, inexperienced systems analysts often lack domain knowledge leading and this affects the quality of models they produce. In this paper we propose to support this modeling effort with an approach that uses domain knowledge to improve the semantic quality of BP models. This approach relies on domain ontologies as a mean to capture domain knowledge and on meta-modeling techniques. The main contribution of this paper is threefold: 1) the metamodels describing both a domain ontology and a BP model are described, 2) the alignment between the concepts of both meta-models is defined and illustrated, 3) a set of OCL mapping rules is provided. A simple case study illustrates the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The international standards organisation iso

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Challenges in business process analysis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aguilar-Savén, R.S.: Business process modelling: Review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics 90(2), 129–149 (2004), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-52730300102-6 , doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00102-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000), http://www.springerlink.com/index/DRWFDXGUUPX7EVXB.pdf

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Eriksson, H.E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling With UML: Business Patterns at Work, 1 edn. Wiley (2000), http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=0471295515%26tag=ws%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/0471295515%253FSubscriptionId=13CT5CVB80YFWJEPWS02

  7. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Language, Speech, and Communication. MIT Press (1998), http://books.google.fr/books?id=Rehu8OOzMIMC

  8. Ghani, A., Muketha, K., Wen, W.: Complexity Metrics for Measuring the Understandability and Maintainability of Business Process Models using Goal-Question-Metric (GQM). International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 8, 219–225+ (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen-vullers, M.H., Netjes, M.: Business process simulation - a tool survey. In: Workshop and Tutorial on Practical Use of Coloured Petri Nets and the CPN (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, H. (ed.): Business process reengineering, reprinted edn. Wiley, Chichester (1994), http://gso.gbv.de/DB=2.1/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&SRT=YOP&IKT=1016&TRM=ppn+124207413&sourceid=fbw_bibsonomy

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiya, H., Saeki, M.: Ontology based requirements analysis: Lightweight semantic processing approach. In: International Conference on Quality Software, pp. 223–230 (2005), doi: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/QSIC.2005.46

  12. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Park, S.J.: Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and is domain knowledge. Information Systems Research 17(1), 81–99 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krogstie, J., Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G.: Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. In: Proceedings of the IFIP International Working Conference on Information System Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views, pp. 216–231. Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London (1995), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645618.660960

    Google Scholar 

  14. List, B., Korherr, B.: An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2006, pp. 1532–1539. ACM, New York (2007), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1141277.1141633 , doi:10.1145/1141277.1141633

  15. Mendling, J., Recker, J.C., Reijers, H.A.: On the usage of labels and icons in business process modeling. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(2), 40–58 (2010), http://eprints.qut.edu.au/32288/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lopes de Oliveira, J., Graciano Neto, V.V., Larissa da Costa, S.: A business process metamodel for enterprise information systems automatic generation. In: Anais do I Congresso Brasileiro de Software: Teoria e Prtica - I Workshop Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento de Software Dirigido por Modelos, pp. 45–52. UFBA, Salvador (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Purao, S., Storey, V.C.: A multi-layered ontology for comparing relationship semantics in conceptual models of databases. Appl. Ontol. 1(1), 117–139 (2005), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1412350.1412360

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tziviskou, C., Keet, C.M.: A Meta-model for Ontologies with ORM2. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM-WS 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4805, pp. 624–633. Springer, Heidelberg (2007), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1780909.1781012

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanderfeesten, I., Cardoso, J., Reijers, H.A., Van Der Aalst, W.: Quality Metrics for Business Process Models (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vanderfeesten, I., Cardoso, J., Reijers, H.A., Van Der Aalst, W.: Quality Metrics for Business Process Models (2007), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.95.7331

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Si-Said Cherfi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cherfi, S.SS., Ayad, S., Comyn-Wattiau, I. (2013). Aligning Business Process Models and Domain Knowledge: A Meta-modeling Approach. In: Morzy, T., Härder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32741-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32741-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32740-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32741-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics