Advertisement

Wayfinding in Real Cities: Experiments at Street Corners

  • Beatrix Emo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7463)

Abstract

Experimental evidence sheds new light on the role of spatial geometry for wayfinding in real urban environments. Eye-tracking is used in a desktop-based experiment to study where people look during wayfinding decisions when let to look freely or asked to find a taxi rank. Gaze patterns from these two tasks are compared with a subsequent recall task and analyzed in light of the topology of the street grid. Results show that decisions strongly favor more connected streets, and that fixation patterns respond to the spatial geometry of the stimuli in both the spatial decision-making and recall tasks. Controls single out the impacts of lighting and affordances in both the behavioral responses and gaze bias patterns; the presence of people and traffic serve as particularly strong attractors. The paper highlights the role of spatial geometry for individual spatial decision-making in real urban environments.

Keywords

Wayfinding spatial configuration space syntax gaze bias individual 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Montello, D.: Spatial Cognition. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 14771–14775. Pergamon (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weisman, J.: Evaluating architectural legibility. Wayfinding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior 13, 189–204 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peponis, J., Zimring, C., Choi, Y.K.: Finding the Building in Wayfinding. Environment and Behavior 22, 555–590 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haq, S., Zimring, C.: Just down the road a piece - The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior 35, 132–160 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hölscher, C., Brösamle, M., Vrachliotis, G.: Challenges in multilevel wayfinding: a case study with the space syntax technique. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39, 63–82 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emo, B., Hölscher, C., Wiener, J.M., Dalton, R.C.: Wayfinding and spatial configuration: evidence from street corners. In: Greene, M., Reyes, G., Castro, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eight International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegel, A., White, S.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese, H.W. (ed.) Advances in Child Development and Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 9–55. Academic Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gärling, T., Böok, A.: Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments: the interrelation of action plans, acquisition and orientation. Environment and Behavior 16, 3–30 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hölscher, C., Meilinger, T., Vrachliotis, G., Brösamle, M., Knauff, M.: Up and down the staircase: wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26, 284–299 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Appleyard, D.: Styles and methods for structuring a city. Environment and Behavior 2, 100–117 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zacharias, J.: Path choice and visual stimuli: stimuli of human actiivity and architecture. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21, 341–352 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalton, R.C., Troffa, R., Zacharias, J., Hölscher, C.: Visual information in the built environment and its effect on wayfinding and explorative behavior. In: Bonaiuto, M., Bonnes, M., Nenci, A., Carrus, G. (eds.) Urban Diversities – Environmental and Social Issues, pp. 6–76. Hogrefe (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hegarty, M., Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., Lovelace, K., Subbiah, I.: Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30, 425–447 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiener, J.M., Büchner, S., Hölscher, C.: Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach. Spatial Cognition & Computation 9, 152–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bafna, S.: Space Syntax: A Brief Introduction to Its Logic and Analytical Techniques. Environment and Behavior 35, 17–29 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harary, J.: Graph Theory. Perseus Books (1969)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hillier, B., Iida, S.: Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement. In: Cohn, A., Mark, D. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 475–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penn, A.: Space syntax and spatial cognition – or why the axial line. Environment and Behavior 35, 30–65 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dalton, R.C., Hölscher, C., Turner, A.: Understanding space: the nascent synthesis of cognition and the syntax of spatial morphologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39, 7–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiener, J.M., Hölscher, C., Büchener, S., Konieczny, L.: Gaze behaviour during Space Perception and Spatial Decision Making. Psychological Research (in press)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pinelo, J.: Towards a Spatial Congruence Theory. How spatial cognition can inform urban planning and design. PhD Thesis, University College London (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Henderson, J.: Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 498–504 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational Modelling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 194–203 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M.S., Henderson, J.M.: Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 113, 766–786 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yarbus, A.: Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Neill, M.: Evaluation of a conceptual model of architecural legibility. Environment and Behavior 23, 553–574 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hardy, A.C.: Landscape and Human Perception. In: Murray, A.C. (ed.) Methods of Landscape Analysis. Landscape Research Group, London (1967)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tandy, C.: The Isovist Method of Landscape Survey. In: Murray, A.C. (ed.) Methods of Landscape Analysis. Landscape Research Group, London (1967)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Benedikt, M.L.: To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6, 47–65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Turner, A., Doxa, M., Sulivan, D.O., Penn, A.: From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28, 103–121 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Franz, G., Wiener, J.M.: From space syntax to space semantics: a behaviorally and perceptually oriented methodology for the efficient description of the geometry and topology of environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35, 575–592 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wiener, J.M., Franz, G., Rossmanith, N., Reichelt, A., Mallot, H.A., Bülthoff, H.H.: Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. Perception 36, 1066–1083 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meilinger, T., Franz, G., Bülthoff, H.H.: From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: first steps towards closing the causal chain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39, 48–62 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Emo, B.: The Visual Properties of Spatial Configuration. In: Dara-Abrams, D., Conroy Dalton, R., Hölscher, C., Turner, A. (eds.) Environmental Modeling: Using Space Syntax in Spatial Cognition Research. Proceedings of the Workshop at Spatial Cognition 2010, Mt. Hood, Oregon. SFB/TR 8 Report No. 026-12/ (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatrix Emo
    • 1
  1. 1.Bartlett School of Graduate StudiesUCLUK

Personalised recommendations