Advertisement

Searching for Synergies among Future Internet Ingredients

  • Antonio Marcos Alberti
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 310)

Abstract

Currently, there are many proposals to redesign the Internet. While some design ingredients are common to several approaches, the way they are adopted and combined usually differs from proposal to proposal. This paper defends the argument that a deeper architectural rethinking requires a deeper search for synergies among the selected ingredients. It argues that this is fundamentally a possible path to simplify the design, since ingredients are homogenized towards more coherent blueprints. The paper explores raised synergies in a conceptual way and proposes some guidelines to help designing accordingly.

Keywords

Future Internet design technologies requirements architecture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pan, J., Paul, S., Jain, R.: A Survey of the Research on Future Internet Architectures. IEEE Communications Magazine 49(7), 26–36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuckmann, P., Zimmermann, R.: European Research on Future Internet Design. IEEE Wireless Communications 16(5), 14–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alberti, A.M.: Future Network Architectures: Technological Challenges and Trends. In: Tronco, T. (ed.) New Network Architectures. SCI, vol. 297, pp. 79–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tarkoma, S., Ain, M., Visala, K.: The Publish/Subscribe Internet Routing Paradigm (PSIRP): Designing the Future Internet Architecture. IOS Press (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chun, W., Lee, T.-H., Choi, T.: Yanail: Yet Another Definition on Names, Addresses, Identifiers, and Locators. In: 6th ICFT, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chowdhury, N.M.M.K., Boutaba, R.: Network Virtualization: State of the Art and Research Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 47(7), 20–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reitblatt, M., Foster, N., Rexford, J., Walker, D.: Consistent Updates for Software-Defined Networks: Change You Can Believe In! In: 10th Hot Topics in Networks, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The Internet of Things: A Survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Presser, M., et al.: Real World Internet. Future Internet Assembly, Tech. Rep. (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schroth, C., Janner, T.: Web 2.0 and SOA: Converging Concepts Enabling the Internet of Services. IT Professional 9(3), 36–41 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T.: The Semantic Web Revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kephart, J., Chess, D.: The Vision of Autonomic Computing. Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Marcos Alberti
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Nacional de Telecomunicações - INATELSanta Rita do SapucaíBrazil

Personalised recommendations