Concluding Remarks

  • Emily Hartz


The purpose of this book was to offer a comprehensive discussion of the United States Supreme Court’s decisions concerning suspensions of basic liberties during armed conflicts from the American Civil War to the War on Terrorism.


Armed Conflict Supreme Court Decision National Emergency United States Supreme Basic Liberty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cole D (2004) The priority of morality: the emergency constitutions blind spot. Yale Law J 113(8):1753–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Paulsen MS (2002) Youngstown goes to war. Const Comment 19(1):215Google Scholar

List of Cases

  1. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Hirabayashi v. U.S., 320 U.S. 81 (1943)Google Scholar
  5. Korematsu v. U.S., 323 U.S. 214 (1944)Google Scholar
  6. Quirin, Ex parte, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)Google Scholar
  7. Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations