Advertisement

The Rights Model

  • Emily Hartz
Chapter

Abstract

The most famous United States Supreme Court case related to the problem of emergency is the case Ex Parte Milligan from 1866. The case is famous because of its ringing endorsement of the unchanging nature of fundamental constitutional rights.

Keywords

Public Safety Civil Liberty United States Constitution Military Tribunal Military Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brest P (2006) Processes of constitutional decisionmaking: cases and materials, 5th Aufl. Aspen Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Constant B (2006) Constant Political Writings (The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation and their Relation to European Civilization) Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Gross O, Ní Aoláin F (2006) Law in times of crisis: emergency powers in theory and practice. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England: 1996). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Hartz E (2010) From Milligan to Boumediene: three models of emergency jurisprudence in the American Supreme Court. Balt J Law Polit 3(2):69–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Issacharoff, S. and R. H. Pildes (2004). “Emergency Contexts without Emergency Powers: The United States Constitutional Approach to Rights during Wartime” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2(3)Google Scholar
  6. Locke J (1993) Two treatises of government. Everyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. McLaughlin AC (2001) A constitutional history of the United States. Simon Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Rehnquist WH (1998) All the laws but one: civil liberties in wartime, 1st Aufl. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Rossiter, C. L. (2002). Constitutional Dictatorship : crisis government in the modern democracies. New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlesinger AM (2004) The imperial presidency, 1st Mariner Books Aufl. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Spaulding NW (2005) The discourse of law in time of war: politics and professionalism during the civil war and reconstruction. William Mary Law Rev 46 (6):2001–2108Google Scholar
  12. Stone GR (2004) Perilous times: free speech in wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the war on terrorism, 1st Aufl. W.W. Norton & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Winthrop W (1920) Military law and precedents. GPO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

List of Cited Cases

  1. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Endo, Ex parte 323 U.S. 283 (1944)Google Scholar
  3. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Hirabayashi v. U.S., 320 U.S. 81 (1943)Google Scholar
  6. Merryman, Ex Parte 17 Fed. Cas. 144 (No. 9487) (C.C.D. Md. 1861)Google Scholar
  7. Milligan, Ex parte, 71 U.S. 2 (1866)Google Scholar
  8. Quirin, Ex parte, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)Google Scholar
  9. Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Vallandigham, Ex parte, 68 U.S. (I Wall.) 243 (1863)Google Scholar
  11. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark

Personalised recommendations