Advertisement

Tissue Deformation Recovery with Gaussian Mixture Model Based Structure from Motion

  • Stamatia Giannarou
  • Guang-Zhong Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7264)

Abstract

Accurate 3D reconstruction of the surgical scene is important in intra-operative guidance. Existing methods are often based on the assumption that the camera is static or the tissue is deforming with periodic motion. In minimally invasive surgery, these assumptions do not always hold due to free-form tissue deformation induced by instrument-tissue interaction and camera motion required for continuous exploration of the surgical scene, particularly for intraluminal procedures. The aim of this work is to propose a novel framework for intra-operative free-form deformation recovery. The proposed method builds on a compact scene representation scheme that is suitable for both surgical episode identification and instrument-tissue motion modeling. Unlike previous approaches, it does not impose explicit models on tissue deformation, allowing realistic free-form deformation recovery. Validation is provided on both synthetic and phantom data. The practical value of the method is further demonstrated by deformation recovery on in vivo data recorded from a robotic assisted minimally invasive surgical procedure.

Keywords

Gaussian Mixture Model Minimally Invasive Surgery Camera Motion Tissue Deformation Structure From Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lau, W.W., Ramey, N.A., Corso, J.J., Thakor, N.V., Hager, G.D.: Stereo-Based Endoscopic Tracking of Cardiac Surface Deformation. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3217, pp. 494–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hager, G., Vagvolgyi, B., Yuh, D.: Stereoscopic video overlay with deformable registration. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcya, O., Civera, J., Gueme, A., Munoz, V., Montiel, J.: Real-time 3d modeling from endoscope image sequences. In: Workshop on Advanced Sensing and Sensor Integration in Medical Robotics, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mirota, D., Wang, H., Taylor, R.H., Ishii, M., Hager, G.D.: Toward Video-Based Navigation for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5761, pp. 91–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, C., Sun, Y., Chang, C.: Three-dimensional modeling from endoscopic video using geometric constraints via feature positioning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 54(7), 1199–1211 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, M., Penney, G.P., Rueckert, D., Edwards, P.J., Bello, F., Casula, R., Figl, M., Hawkes, D.J.: Non-rigid Reconstruction of the Beating Heart Surface for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5761, pp. 34–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richa, R., Bó, A.P.L., Poignet, P.: Robust 3D Visual Tracking for Robotic-Assisted Cardiac Interventions. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6361, pp. 267–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stoyanov, D., Visentini-Scarzanella, M., Pratt, P., Yang, G.Z.: Real-Time Stereo Reconstruction in Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. In: Jiang, T., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6361, pp. 275–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mountney, P., Yang, G.-Z.: Motion Compensated SLAM for Image Guided Surgery. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6362, pp. 496–504. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giannarou, S., Yang, G.Z.: Content-based surgical workflow representation using probabilistic motion modeling. In: International Workshop on Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality, pp. 314–323 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giannarou, S., Visentini-Scarzanella, M., Yang, G.Z.: Affine-invariant anisotropic detector for soft tissue tracking in minimally invasive surgery. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1059–1062 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nistér, D.: An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 26(6), 756–770 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mosteller, E., Turkey, J.: Data and analysis and regression. Addison Wesley (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanchez-Riera, J., Ostlund, J., Fua, P., Moreno-Noguer, F.: Simultaneous pose, correspondence, and non-rigid shape. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1189–1196 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stamatia Giannarou
    • 1
  • Guang-Zhong Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamlyn Centre for Robotic SurgeryImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations