SocioPath: Bridging the Gap between Digital and Social Worlds

  • Nagham Alhadad
  • Philippe Lamarre
  • Yann Busnel
  • Patricia Serrano-Alvarado
  • Marco Biazzini
  • Christophe Sibertin-Blanc
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7447)


Everyday, people use more and more digital resources (data, application systems, Internet, etc.) for all aspects of their life, like financial management, private exchanges, collaborative work, etc. This leads to non-negligible dependences on the digital distributed resources that reveal strong reliance at the social level. Users are often not aware of their real autonomy regarding the management of their digital resources. People underestimate social dependences generated by the system they use and the resulting potential risks. We argue that it is necessary to be aware of some key aspects of system’s architectures to be able to know dependences. This work proposes SocioPath, a generic meta-model to derive dependences generated by system’s architectures. It focuses on relations, like access, control, ownership among different entities of the system (digital resources, hardware, persons, etc.). Enriched with deduction rules and definitions, SocioPath reveals the dependence of a person on each entity in the system. This meta-model can be useful to evaluate a system, as a modeling tool that bridges the gap between the digital and the social worlds.


Social World Physical Resource Legal Entity Digital World Digital Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Coulouris, G., Dollimore, J., Kindberg: Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Harlow (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weaver, A.C., Morrison, B.B.: Social Networking. Computer 41, 97–100 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Westin, A.F.: Privacy and Freedom, 6th edn. Atheneum, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marti, S., Garcia-Molina, H.: Taxonomy of Trust: Categorizing P2P Reputation Systems. Computer Network Journal 50, 472–484 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lampson, B., Abadi, M., Burrows, M., Wobber, E.: Authentication in Distributed Systems: Theory and Practice. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 10, 265–310 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aurrecoechea, C., Campbell, A.T., Hauw, L.: A Survey of QoS Architectures. Multimedia Systems 6, 138–151 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emerson, R.M.: Power-Dependence Relations. Amer. Sociological Review 27, 31–41 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Molm, L.: Structure, Action, and Outcomes: The Dynamics of Power in Social Exchange. American Sociological Association Edition (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blau, P.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley and Sons (1964)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alhadad, N., Lamarre, P., Busnel, Y., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Biazzini, M.: SocioPath: In Whom You Trust? Journes Bases de Donnes Avances (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goethals, F., Lemahieu, W., Snoeckand, M., Vandenbulcke, J.: An Overview of Enterprise Architecture Framework Deliverables. In: Banda, R.K.J. (ed.) Enterprise Architecture-An Introduction. ICFAI University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farooqui, K., Logrippo, L., de Meer, J.: The ISO Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing: An Introduction. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 27, 1215–1229 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    TOGAF: Welcome to TOGAF - The Open Group Architectural Framework (2002),
  14. 14.
    Alhadad, N., Lamarre, P., Busnel, Y., Serrano-Alvarado, P., Biazzini, M., Sibertin-Blanc, C.: SOCIOPATH: In Whom You Trust? Technical report, LINA – CNRS: UMR6241 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nagham Alhadad
    • 1
  • Philippe Lamarre
    • 2
  • Yann Busnel
    • 1
  • Patricia Serrano-Alvarado
    • 1
  • Marco Biazzini
    • 1
  • Christophe Sibertin-Blanc
    • 3
  1. 1.LINAUniversité de NantesNantesFrance
  2. 2.LirisUniversité de LyonLyonFrance
  3. 3.IRITUniversité de Toulouse 1ToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations