Advertisement

Ontology-Based Recommendation Algorithms for Personalized Education

  • Amir Bahmani
  • Sahra Sedigh
  • Ali Hurson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7447)

Abstract

This paper presents recommendation algorithms that personalize course and curriculum content for individual students, within the broader scope of Pervasive Cyberinfrastructure for Personalizing Learning and Instructional Support (PERCEPOLIS). The context considered in making recommendations includes the academic background, interests, and computing environment of the student, as well as past recommendations made to students with similar profiles. Context provision, interpretation, and management are the services that facilitate consideration of this information. Context modeling is through a two-level hierarchy of generic and domain ontologies, respectively; reducing the reasoning search space. Imprecise query support increases the flexibility of the recommendation engine, by allowing interpretation of context provided in terms equivalent, but not necessarily identical to database access terms of the system. The relevance of the recommendations is increased by using both individual and collaborative filtering. Correct operation of the algorithms has been verified through prototyping.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Association for Computing Machinery. The ACM Computing Classification System (1998 version), http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998 (retrieved June 2012)
  2. 2.
    Badii, A., Crouch, M., Lallah, C.: A context-awareness framework for intelligent networked embedded systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Human-Oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services, pp. 105–110 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahmani, A., Sedigh, S., Hurson, A.R.: Context-aware recommendation algorithms for the percepolis personalized education platform. In: Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. F4E–1–F4E–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldauf, M., Dustdar, S., Rosenberg, F.: A survey on context-aware systems. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing 2, 263–277 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bettini, C., Brdiczka, O., Henricksen, K., Indulska, J., Nicklas, D., Ranganathan, A., Riboni, D.: A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6(2), 161–180 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coppola, P., Della Mea, V., Gaspero, L., Lomuscio, R., Mischis, D., Mizzaro, S., Nazzi, E., Scagnetto, I., Vassena, L.: AI techniques in a context-aware ubiquitous environment. In: Hassanien, A.-E., Abawajy, J.H., Abraham, A., Hagras, H. (eds.) Pervasive Computing. Computer Communications and Networks, pp. 157–180. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., Chilko, D.M.: Statistics for Research. John Wiley and Sons (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ejigu, D., Scuturici, M., Brunie, L.: An ontology-based approach to context modeling and reasoning in pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pp. 14–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garruzzo, S., Rosaci, D., Sarne, G.: Isabel: A multi agent e-learning system that supports multiple devices. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, pp. 485–488 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Graf, S., MacCallum, K., Liu, T., Chang, M., Wen, D., Tan, Q., Dron, J., Lin, F., Chen, N., McGreal, R., Kinshuk, N.: An infrastructure for developing pervasive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, pp. 389–394 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knappmeyer, M., Baker, N., Liaquat, S., Tönjes, R.: A Context Provisioning Framework to Support Pervasive and Ubiquitous Applications. In: Barnaghi, P., Moessner, K., Presser, M., Meissner, S. (eds.) EuroSSC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5741, pp. 93–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 175–186 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakthiyavathi, K., Palanivel, K.: A generic architecture for agent based e-learning system. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Agent Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1–5 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strang, T., Linnhoff-Popien, C.: A context modeling survey. In: Proceeings of the Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management - The Sixth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu, C., Cheung, S.C., Chan, W.K., Ye, C.: Partial constraint checking for context consistency in pervasive computing. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 19, 9:1–9:61 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, K., Zhu, M., Zhang, D., Gu, T.: Context-aware content filtering & presentation for pervasive & mobile information systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Ambient Media and Systems, pp. 20:1–20:8 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Bahmani
    • 1
  • Sahra Sedigh
    • 2
  • Ali Hurson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations