The Biointelligence Explosion

How Recursively Self-Improving Organic Robots will Modify their Own Source Code and Bootstrap Our Way to Full-Spectrum Superintelligence
Chapter
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)

Abstract

This essay explores how recursively self-improving organic robots will modify their own genetic source code and bootstrap our way to full-spectrum superintelligence. Starting with individual genes, then clusters of genes, and eventually hundreds of genes and alternative splice variants, tomorrow’s biohackers will exploit “narrow” AI to debug human source code in a positive feedback loop of mutual enhancement. Genetically enriched humans can potentially abolish aging and disease; recalibrate the hedonic treadmill to enjoy gradients of lifelong bliss, and phase out the biology of suffering throughout the living world.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder Digital Computer Conscious Mind Hedonic Tone Intelligent Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baker, S. (2011). Final Jeopardy: man vs. machine and the quest to know everything. (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).Google Scholar
  2. Ball, P. (2011). Physics of life: The dawn of quantum biology. Nature, 474(2011), 272–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banissy, M., et al. (2009). Prevalence, characteristics and a neurocognitive model of mirror-touch synaesthesia. Experimental Brain Research, 198(2–3), 261–272. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1810-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkow, J., Cosimdes, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind (MIT Press/Bradford Books).Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism Development Disorders, 31(1): 5–17. doi: 10.1023/A:1005653411471. PMID 11439754.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Autism spectrum questionnaire. (Cambridge: Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge) http://psychology-tools.com/autism-spectrum-quotient/.
  8. Benatar, D. (2006). Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprint.Google Scholar
  10. Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (Eds.). (2010). Pleasures of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bostrom, N. (2002). Existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 9.Google Scholar
  12. Boukany, P. E., et al. (2011). Nanochannel electroporation delivers precise amounts of biomolecules into living cells. Nature Nanotechnology, 6(2011), 74.Google Scholar
  13. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personal Society Psychology, 36(8), 917–927. 7–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(1–3), 139–159. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. (1997). “Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind”. (Allyn & Bacon).Google Scholar
  16. Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chalmers, D. J. (2010). The singularity: a philosophical analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(9), 7–65.Google Scholar
  19. Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Churchland, P. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: the nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Cochran, G., Harpending, H. (2009). The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Cochran, G., Hardy, J., & Harpending, H. (2006). Natural history of Ashkenazi intelligence. Journal of Biosocial Science, 38(5), 659–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohn, N. (1957). The pursuit of the millennium: revolutionary millenarians and mystical anarchists of the middle ages (Pimlico).Google Scholar
  26. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York City: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. de Garis, H. (2005). The Artilect War: Cosmists vs. Terrans: A bitter controversy concerning whether humanity should build godlike massively intelligent machines. ETC. Publications, pp. 254. ISBN 978-0882801537.Google Scholar
  28. de Grey, A. (2007). Ending aging: The rejuvenation breakthroughs that could reverse human aging in our lifetime. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  29. Delgado, J. (1969). Physical control of the mind: Toward a psychocivilized society. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  30. Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Deutsch, D. (1997). The fabric of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Deutsch, D. (2011). The beginning of infinity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Drexler, E. (1986). Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  34. Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s cathedral: The origins of the digital universe. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  35. Everett, H. (1973). The theory of the universal wavefunction. Manuscript (1955), pp 3–140 In B. DeWitt, & R. N. Graham, (Eds.), The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton series in physics. Princeton, Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08131-X.Google Scholar
  36. Francione, G. (2006). Taking sentience seriously. Journal of Animal Law & Ethics 1.Google Scholar
  37. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Goertzel, B. (2006). The hidden pattern: A patternist philosophy of mind. (Brown Walker Press).Google Scholar
  39. Good, I. J. (1965). Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In L. F. Alt & M. Rubinoff (Eds.), Advances in computers (pp. 31–88). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gunderson, K. (1985). Mentality and machines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hagan, S., Hameroff, S., & Tuszynski, J. (2002). Quantum computation in brain microtubules? Decoherence and biological feasibility. Physical Reviews, E65, 061901.Google Scholar
  42. Haidt, J. (2012). THE righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  43. Hameroff, S. (2006). Consciousness, neurobiology and quantum mechanics. In The emerging physics of consciousness, J. Tuszynski (Ed.) (Springer).Google Scholar
  44. Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Holland, J. (2001). Ecstasy: The complete guide: A comprehensive look at the risks and benefits of mdma. (Park Street Press).Google Scholar
  47. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hutter, M. (2010). Universal artificial intelligence: Sequential decisions based on algorithmic probability. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Hutter, M. (2012). Can intelligence explode? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19, 1–2.Google Scholar
  50. Huxley, A. (1932). Brave New World. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  51. Huxley, A. (1954). Doors of perception and heaven and hell. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  52. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux: Farrar.Google Scholar
  53. Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason. In P. Guyer & A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  54. Koch, C. (2004). The Quest for Consciousness: a Neurobiological Approach. Roberts & Co..Google Scholar
  55. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  56. Kurzweil, R. (1990). The age of intelligent machines. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Kurzweil, R. (1998). The age of spiritual machines. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  58. Langdon, W., Poli, R. (2002). Foundations of genetic programming. New York: Springe).Google Scholar
  59. Lee, H. J., Macbeth, A. H., Pagani, J. H., Young, W. S. (2009). Oxytocin: The great facilitator of life. Progress in Neurobiology 88 (2): 127–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.04.001. PMC 2689929. PMID 19482229.
  60. Legg, S., Hutter, M. (2007). Universal intelligence: A definition of machine intelligence. Minds & Machines, 17(4), pp. 391–444.Google Scholar
  61. Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354–361.Google Scholar
  62. Litt, A., et al. (2006). Is the Brain a Quantum Computer? Cognitive Science, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
  63. Lloyd, S. (2002). Computational capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters 88(23): 237901. arXiv:quant-ph/0110141. Bibcode 2002PhRvL..88w7901L.Google Scholar
  64. Lockwood, L. (1989). Mind, brain, and the quantum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Mackie, JL. (1991). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  66. Markram, H. (2006). The blue brain project. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7:153–160. PMID 16429124.Google Scholar
  67. Merricks, T. (2001). Objects and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Minsky, M. (1987). The society of mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  69. Moravec, H. (1990). Mind children: The future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhwere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Omohundro, S. (2007). The Nature of Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco: Singularity Summit.Google Scholar
  73. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Pearce, D. (1995). The hedonistic imperative http://hedweb.com.
  75. Pellissier, H. (2011) Women-only leadership: Would it prevent war? http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/4576.
  76. Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Peterson, D., Wrangham, R. (1997). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  78. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  79. Rees, M. (2003). Our final hour: A scientist’s warning: How terror, error, and environmental disaster threaten humankind’s future in this century—on earth and beyond. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Reimann F, et al. (2010). Pain perception is altered by a nucleotide polymorphism in SCN9A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107(11):5148–5153 (2010 Mar 16).Google Scholar
  81. Rescher, N. (1974). Conceptual idealism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  82. Revonsuo, A. (2005). Inner presence: Consciousness as a biological phenomenon. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  83. Revonsuo, A., & Newman, J. (1999). Binding and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2–4), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  86. Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  87. Sandberg, A., Bostrom, N. (2008). Whole brain emulation: A roadmap. Technical report 2008-3.Google Scholar
  88. Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (2010). Many worlds: Everett, quantum theory, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Schlaepfer, T. E., & Fins, J. J. (2012). How happy is too happy? Euphoria, neuroethics and deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. The American Journal of Bioethics, 3, 30–36.Google Scholar
  90. Schmidhuber, J. (2012). Philosophers & Futurists, Catch Up! Response to the singularity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19: 1–2, pp. 173–182.Google Scholar
  91. Seager, W. (1999). Theories of consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Seager, W. (2006). The ‘intrinsic nature’ argument for panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 13(10–11), 129–145.Google Scholar
  93. Sherman, W., Craig A., (2002). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  94. Shulgin, A. (1995). PiHKAL: A chemical love story. Berkeley: Transform Press.Google Scholar
  95. Shulgin, A. (1997). TiHKAL: The continuation. Berkeley: Transform Press.Google Scholar
  96. Shulgin, A. (2011). The shulgin index vol 1: Psychedelic phenethylamines and related compounds. Berkeley: Transform Press.Google Scholar
  97. Shulman, C., Sandberg, A. (2010). Implications of a software-limited singularity. Proceedings of the European Conference of Computing and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  98. Sidgwick, H. (1907). The methods of ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett, seventh edition, 1981, 1-4.Google Scholar
  99. Singer, P. (1995). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  100. Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  101. Smart, JM. (2008–2011) Evo Devo Universe? A Framework for Speculations on Cosmic Culture. In Cosmos and culture: Cultural evolution in a cosmic context. J. S. Dick, M. L. Lupisella (Eds.), Govt Printing Office, NASA SP-2009-4802, Wash., D.C., 2009, pp. 201–295.Google Scholar
  102. Stock, G. (2002). Redesigning humans: Our inevitable genetic future. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  103. Strawson G., et al. (2006). Consciousness and its place in nature: Does physicalism entail panpsychism? Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  104. Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, 61(4), 4194–4206. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tsien, J. et al., (1999). Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 401, 63–69 (2 September 1999) | doi: 10.1038/43432.Google Scholar
  106. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433–460.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity. New Whole Earth LLC: Whole Earth Review.Google Scholar
  108. Vitiello, G. (2001). My double unveiled; advances in consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  109. Waal, F. (2000). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes”. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Wallace, D. (2012). The Emergent multiverse: Quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Welty, G. (1970). The history of the prediction paradox, presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for the History of the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Akron, OH (May 10, 1970), Wright State University Dayton, OH 45435 USA. http://www.wright.edu/~gordon.welty/Prediction_70.htm.
  112. Wohlsen, M. (2011): Biopunk: DIY scientists hack the software of life. London: Current.Google Scholar
  113. Yudkowsky, E. (2007). Three major singularity schools. http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools.
  114. Yudkowsky, E. (2008). Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In Bostrom, Nick and Cirkovic, Milan M. (Eds.). Global catastrophic risks. pp. 308–345 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  115. Zeki, S. (1991). Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness): A review. Brain, 114, 811–824. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.2.811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BLTC ReseerchBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations