Advertisement

User-Oriented Product Search Based on Consumer Values and Lifestyles

  • Hesam Ziaei
  • Wayne Wobcke
  • Anna Wong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7457)

Abstract

Product search engines are essentially unchanged since the inception of online shopping, providing basic browsing by category and “advanced” keyword search. This paper presents a user-oriented product search method based on consumer values and lifestyles that correspond to user purchasing criteria rather than technical specifications. The technique is suited to relatively infrequent purchases where users possess little domain or market knowledge and existing interfaces are difficult to use. We show how to construct a knowledge base to support a user-oriented product search engine without the need for a domain expert to manually label the items. We present Lifestyle Car Finder, a user-oriented product search system in the domain of new cars. The system incorporates various modes of navigation (search refinement, a new form of critiquing adaptive to the user’s query, and breadcrumb trails) and decision support (similar car comparison, explanations and technical specifications). We report on a user study showing that, broadly speaking, users were highly satisfied with the system and felt they were confident in their decisions.

Keywords

Recommender System User Study Ranking Function Result Page Market Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 478–499 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W.: Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 187–217 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilgic, M., Mooney, R.J.: Explaining Recommendations: Satisfaction vs. Promotion. In: Proceedings of the IUI 2005 Workshop: Beyond Personalization (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, R.D., Hammond, K.J., Young, B.C.: The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing. IEEE Expert 12(4), 32–40 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fagin, R., Lotem, A., Naor, M.: Optimal Aggregation Algorithms for Middleware. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 66, 614–656 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felix, D., Niederberger, C., Steiger, P., Stolze, M.: Feature-Oriented vs. Needs-Oriented Product Access for Non-Expert Online Shoppers. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Towards the E-Society: E-Commerce, E-Business, E-Government, pp. 399–406 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammond, K.J., Burke, R., Schmitt, K.: A Case-Based Approach to Knowledge Navigation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 1994 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 383–393 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holman, R.H.: A Values and Lifestyles Perspective on Human Behavior. In: Pitts Jr., R.E., Woodside, A.G. (eds.) Personal Values and Consumer Psychology. Lexington Books, Lexington (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly, J.P., Bridge, D.: Enhancing the Diversity of Conversational Collaborative Recommendations: A Comparison. Artificial Intelligence Review 25, 79–95 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., Smyth, B., Reilly, J.: On the Evaluation of Dynamic Critiquing: A Large-Scale User Study. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), pp. 535–540 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCarthy, K., Reilly, J., Smyth, B., McGinty, L.: Generating Diverse Compound Critiques. Artificial Intelligence Review 24, 339–357 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McSherry, D.: Explanation in Recommender Systems. Artificial Intelligence Review 24, 179–197 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stolze, M., Ströbel, M.: Recommending as Personalized Teaching: Towards Credible Needs-Based eCommerce Recommender Systems. In: Karat, C.M., Blom, J., Karat, J. (eds.) Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vinson, D.E., Scott, J.E., Lamont, L.M.: The Role of Personal Values in Marketing and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing 41(2), 44–50 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zablocki, B.D., Kanter, R.M.: The Differentiation of Life-Styles. Annual Review of Sociology 2, 269–298 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, J., Pu, P.: A Comparative Study of Compound Critique Generation in Conversational Recommender Systems. In: Wade, V.P., Ashman, H., Smyth, B. (eds.) AH 2006. LNCS, vol. 4018, pp. 234–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hesam Ziaei
    • 1
  • Wayne Wobcke
    • 1
  • Anna Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations