Advertisement

My Familiar Robot Companion: Preferences and Perceptions of CHARLY, a Companion Humanoid Autonomous Robot for Living with You

  • Michael L. Walters
  • Dag Sverre Syrdal
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
  • Anna Dumitriu
  • Alex May
  • Bruce Christiansen
  • Kheng Lee Koay
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7429)

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a survey conducted with visitors to the My Familiar Companion exhibit, part of the HUMAN+ Exhibition at the Science Gallery in Dublin. The exhibit consisted of a humanoid robot, CHARLY (Companion Humanoid Autonomous Robot for Living with You) with a head with a back projected morphing composite face derived from nearby people. Visitors answered a computer-based questionnaire to gain their perceptions and opinions of the exhibit, and also their preferences for a robot that they would like to have in their own home. The main findings indicated that most respondents would not want a very human-like robot, but most would prefer to own a robot with some human-like attributes and capabilities. A principle component analyses indicated that people perceive two main factors when rating their preferences for their preferred robots, Physical Similarity and Expressive Similarity. Both these derived factors correlate strongly to their ratings for Human-likeness versus Machine-likeness. It was found that slightly more male than female respondents were more likely to relate to their own robot as a colleague, though overall, most respondents would relate to their own robot as a servant or tool.

Keywords

Human-Robot Interaction User Study Survey Artist Collaboration Robot Appearance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, S., Yee-man Lau, I., Kiesler, S., Chiu, C.: Human Models of Humanoid Robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2005), pp. 2767–2772 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Syrdal, D.S., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Woods, S.N., Dautenhahn, K.: Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance. In: AAAI - Spring Symposium 2007, Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, pp. 86–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryant, D.: The Uncanny Valley. Why are monster-movie zombies so horrifying and talking animals so fascinationg? Glimpses, Written Non-Fiction (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Groom, V., Nass, C., Chen, T., Nielsen, A., Scarborough, J.K., Robles, E.: Evaluating the Effects of Behavioral Realism in Embodied Agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L.: Exploring the Design Space of Robot Appearance and Behaviour in an Attention-Seeking ’Living Room’ Scenario for a Robot Companion. In: Proceedings of IEEE-Artificial Life (Alife 2007), pp. 341–347 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walters, M.L., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L.: Avoiding the Uncanny Valley – Robot Appearance, Personality and Consistency of Behavior in an Attention-Seeking Home Scenario for a Robot Companion. Journal of Autonomous Robots 24(2), 159–178 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N., Kaouri, C., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Werry, I.: What is a Robot companion - Friend, Assistant or Butler? In: Proceedings of IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot Systems (IROS 2005), pp. 1488–1493 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cortellessa, G., Scopelliti, M., Tiberio, L., Koch Svedberg, G., Loutfi, A., Pecora, F.: Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Domestic Assistive Robots. In: Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, pp. FS-08-02 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woods, S.N., Dautenhahn, K., Schulz, J.: The Design Space of Robots: Investigating Children’s Views. In: Proceedings of 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2004), pp. 47–52 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan, Z.: Attitude towards intelligent service robots, Technical Report: NADA, KTH, TRITA-NA-P9821 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M.V., D’Amico, A.M., Fornara, F.: If I Had a Robot at Home.... Peoples’ Representation of Domestic Robots. In: Keates, S., Clarkson, J., Langdon, P., Robinson, P. (eds.) Designing a More Inclusive World, pp. 257–266 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brenton, H., Gillies, M., Ballin, D., Chattin, D.: The Uncanny Valley: Does it exist? In: Proceedings of Conference of Human Computer Interaction, Workshop on Human Animated Character Interaction (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiesler, S., Goetz, J.: Machine Trait Scales for Evaluating Mechanistic Mental Models of Robots and Computer-Based Machines, Technical Report: HCII, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinds, P.J., Roberts, T.L., Jones, H.: Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task. In: Human Computer Interaction, pp. 151–181 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jentsch, E.: On the Psychology of the Uncanny Zur Psychologie des Unheimlichen. Translated by Roy Sellars. Psychiatrisch-Neurologische Wochenschrift, 8.22 & 8.23. pp. 195-98, 203-205 (1906), http://www.cpmg.org.br/artigos/on_the_psychology_of_the_uncanny.pdf
  16. 16.
    Freud, S.: The Uncanny. In: Strachey, J. (ed.) English Translation in: The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 1955, pp. 217–256 (1919)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mori, M.: Bukimi No Tani (The Uncanny Valley). Energy, pp. 33-35 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacDorman, K.F.: Androids as an experimental apparatus: Why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In: Proceedings Of the CogSci 2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 106–118 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferber, D.: The Man Who Mistook His Girlfriend For A Robot. Popular Science (September 2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bethal, C.L., Murphy, R.R.: Affective Expression in Appearance-Constrained Robots. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI/SIGART 2nd Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI 2006), pp. 327–328 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hanson, D., Olney, A., Pereira, I.A., Zielke, M.: Upending the uncanny valley. In: Molla, D., Vicedo, J.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAII) Conference. Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition: Papers from the AAAI Workshop. Technical Report WS-05-11 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Kaouri, C., Woods, S.N., Nehaniv, C.L., Lee, D., Werry, I.: The Influence of Subjects’ Personality Traits on Personal Spatial Zones in a Human-Robot Interaction Experiment. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RoMan 2005), pp. 347–352 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woods, S.N., Dautenhahn, K., Kaouri, C., te Boekhorst, R., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L.: Are Robots Like People? - Relationships between Participant and Robot Personality Traits in Human-Robot Interaction. Interaction Studies 8(3), 281–305 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hashimoto, M., Morooka, D.: Facial Expression of a Robot using a Curved Surface Display. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005), pp. 2532–2537 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Delaunay, F., De Greeff, J., Belpaeme, T.: A Study of a Retro-Projected Robotic Face and its Effectiveness for Gaze Reading by Humans. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2010), pp. 39–44 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    The OpenNI API Framework, http://www.openni.org
  28. 28.
    Open Computer Vision Library (OpenCV), http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary
  29. 29.
    Likert, R.: A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22(140), 1–55 (1932)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Walters
    • 1
  • Dag Sverre Syrdal
    • 1
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
    • 1
  • Anna Dumitriu
    • 1
  • Alex May
    • 1
  • Bruce Christiansen
    • 1
  • Kheng Lee Koay
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations