Newtonian Emotion System

  • Valentin Lungu
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 446)


The main goal of our work is to provide virtual characters with the ability of emotion expression. Our approach is based on the idea that emotions serve a fundamental function in human behavior, and that in order to provide artificial agents with rich believable affective behavior, we need to develop an artificial system that serves the same purpose. We believe that emotions act as a subsystem that enhances human behavior, by stepping up brain activity in arousing circumstances, directing attention and behavior, establishing importance of events and act as motivation. This paper summarizes the psychological theories that our computational emotion model is based on, defines the key concepts of the Newtonian emotion model that we developed and describes how they work within an agent architecture. The Newtonian emotion model is a light-weight and scalable emotion representation and evaluation model to be used by virtual agents. We also designed a plug-and-play emotion subsystem to be integrated into any agent architecture.


Emotional State Attentional Blink Virtual Character Virtual Agent Agent Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burke, A., Heuer, F., Reisberg, D.: Remembering emotional events. Memory & Cognition 20, 277–290 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Sousa, R.: Emotion. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (September 2010),
  3. 3.
    Kensinger, E.A.: Remembering emotional experiences: The contribution of valence and arousal. Reviews in the Neurosciences 15, 241–251 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lazarus, R.S.: Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Plutchik, R.: Emotion: Theory, research, and experience. Theories of emotion, vol. 1. Academic, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schachter, S., Singer, J.: Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review 69, 379–399 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharot, T., Phelps, E.A.: How arousal modulates memory: Disentangling the effects of attention and retention. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4, 294–306 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Politehnica of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations