Abstract
Burning efficiency, defined as the percentage of biomass consumed by the fire, plays a key role in the estimation of the amount of gases released from the biomass burning process. Traditionally this parameter was assigned to a vegetation class as a constant value. However, different levels of damage, also called burn severity, may occur within an area affected by fire. This affects the amount of biomass consumed by burning. Consequently, the burning efficiency coefficients should vary accordingly to the levels of damage presented in the burned area. The approach described in this study estimates the burning efficiency values adjusting the burning efficiency coefficients by vegetation type found in the literature to the level of damage computed from MERIS images. This study focused in two big fires occurred in Spain in 2009. The burning efficiency maps generated highlighted the overestimation produced when the level of damage is not considered in the burning efficiency estimation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doer SH, Shakesby RA, Blake WH, Chafer CJ, Humfreys GS, Wallbrink PJ (2006) Effect of differing wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological response. J Hydrol 319:295–311
Andreae MO, Merlet P (2001) Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15(4):955–966
Vermote E, Ellicot E, Dubovik O, Lapyonok T, Chin M, Giglio L, Roberts GJ (2009) An approach to estimate global biomass burning emissions of organic and black carbon from MODIS fire radiative power. J Geophys Res 114(D18205):23
Seiler W, Crutzen PJ (1980) Estimates of gross and net fluxes of carbon between the biosphere and the atmosphere from biomass burning. Clim Chang 2:207–247
Palacios-Orueta A, Parra A, Chuvieco E, Carmona-Moreno C (2004) Remote sensing and geographic information systems methods for global spatio-temporal modelling of biomass burning emissions: assessment in the African continent. J Geophys Res 109(D14S09):12
Ward DE, Hao WM, Susott RA, Babbitt RE, Shea RW, Kauffmann JB, Justice CO (1996) Effect of fuel composition on the combustion efficiency and emission factors for African savanna ecosystems. J Geophys Res 101(D19):23569–23576
Sá ACL, Pereira JMC, Silva JMN (2005) Estimation of combustion completeness based on fire-induced spectral changes in a dambo grassland (Western province Zambia). Int J Remote Sens 26(19):4185–4195
Jain T, Pilliod D, Graham R (2004) Confused meanings for common fire terminology can lead to fuels mismanagement. A new framework is needed to clarify and communicate the concepts. Wildfire 4:22–26
Key CH, Benson N (2005) Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the composite burn index; and remote sensing of severity, the normalized burn ratio. In: Lutes DC, Keane RE, Caratti JF, Key CH, Benson NC, Gangi LJ (eds) FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system, vol 2004. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report. RMRS-GTR-164, Ogden, UT, pp CD:LA1–LA51
Bézy JL, Delwart S, Rast M (2000) MERIS—a new generation of ocean-color sensor on board Envisat. ESA Bulletin 103:48–56
Guanter L, Gómez-Chova L, Moreno J (2008) Coupled retrieval of aerosol optical thickness, columnar water vapor and surface reflectance maps from Envisat/MERIS data over land. Remote Sens Environ 112:2898–2913
Wiedinmyer C, Quayle B, Geron C, Belote A, McKenzie D, Zhang X (2006) Estimating emissions from fires in North America for air quality modelling. Atmos Environ 40:3419–3432
IPCC (2006) Volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa M, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol 4. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan
Deeming J, Burgan R, Cohen J (1977) The national fire-danger rating system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden
De Santis A, Chuvieco E, Vaughan PJ (2009) Short-term assessment of burn severity using the inversion of PROSPECT and GeoSail models. Remote Sens Environ 113:126–136
De Santis A, Chuvieco E (2009) GeoCBI: a modified version of the composite burn index for the initial assessment of the short-term burn severity sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 113:554–562
Debba P, van Ruitenbeek FJA, van der Meer FD, Carranza JM, Stein A (2005) Optimal field sampling for targeting minerals using hyperspectral data. Remote Sens Environ 99:373–386
Oliva P, De Santis A (2010) Burn severity estimation using MERIS full resolution imagery. In: Lacoste-Francis H (ed) ESA Living Planet symposium, Bergen, Norway, 28 June—2 July 2010. ESA Communications, Noordwijk, p 8
Kasischke ES, French NHF, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Christensen Jr NL (1995) Estimating release of carbon from 1990 and 1991 forest fires in Alaska. J Geophys Res 100(D2):2941–2951
Reid JS, Koppmann R, Eleuterio DP (2005) A review of biomass burning emissions part II: intensive physical properties of biomass burning particles. Atmos Chem Phys 5:799–825
Fearnside PM, Graça PMLA, Rodrigues FAJ (2001) Burning of Amazonian rainforest: burning efficiency and charcoal formation in forest cleared for cattle pasture near Manaus, Brazil. For Ecol Manage 146:115–128
Araújo TM, Carvalho JA, Higuchi N, Brasil ACP, Mesquita ALA (1999) Atropical rainforest clearing experiment by biomass burning in the state of Pará, Brazil. Atmos Environ 33:1991–1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliva, P. (2013). FEMM—Fire Effects Modelling and Mapping: An Approach to Estimate the Spatial Variability of Burning Efficiency. In: Remote Sensing Advances for Earth System Science. SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32521-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32521-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32520-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32521-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)