General Introduction and Overview

  • Poku Adusei


Access to essential medicines has become the single most important issue on the agenda for policy makers in Sub-Saharan Africa (hereinafter SSA or Africa). This book deals with the complex issue of whether global patent protection has had negative and devastating impacts on persons in Africa facing challenges of access to essential medicines. It focuses on the pandemic situations in SSA by unravelling some of the not-so-evident patent regulatory lapses that impede access to medicines in Africa. It underscores the point that the patent system over-relies on property rights and/or efficiency-based utilitarian justifications with little or no regard to the social importance of limits on patent rights. Equally the patent system, which is the most widely used form of juridical control of pharmaceuticals, privileges private property interests over the public interest to deliver medicines to those who need them the most. This traditional bias in favour of private proprietary interests in turn undermines the policy objective of patent law to promote social benefits. To achieve the social benefit goals of a functional (i.e. a well balanced) patent regulatory regime, the globalized pharmaceutical patent system should be equitable and human-development oriented. This book will explore ways to achieve this objective.


World Trade Organization Supra Note Patent System Deliberative Democracy International Patent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



  1. ’t Hoen EFM (2009) The global politics of pharmaceutical monopoly power: drug patents, access, innovation and the application of WTO declaration on TRIPS and public health. AMB, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. African Union (2007) The First of the Technical Committee on the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plan for Africa. Addis Ababa, TCPMPA/RPT (1). Online at
  3. Anghie A (2005) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anghie A et al (eds) (2003) The third world and international order: law, politics and globalization. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa DB et al (2007) Slouching towards development in international intellectual property. Mich St L Rev 71Google Scholar
  6. Baruah B (2003) Human capabilities and gender justice: a South Asian perspective. In: Anghie A et al (eds) The third world and international order: law, politics and globalization. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, p 19Google Scholar
  7. Bate R (2009) Protectionism won’t heal Africa’s sick: incompetence, corruption and opportunism are denying Africans the drugs they need. In: The Wall Street Journal. Online: http://online.wsJcom/article/SB10001424052970204488304574426903620319302.html
  8. BBC (2007) World ‘losing fight against Aids’. Online:
  9. Bird RC (2009) Developing nation and the compulsory license: maximizing access to essential medicines while minimizing investment side effects. Pharmaceutical Regulations 209Google Scholar
  10. Boldrin M, Levine DK (2008) Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Brentlinger PE (2006) Health, human rights, and malaria control: historical background and current challenges. Health Hum Rts 9(2):11Google Scholar
  12. Cann WA (2004) On the relationship between intellectual property rights and the need of less-developed countries for access to pharmaceuticals: creating a legal duty to supply under a theory of progressive global constitutionalism. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 25:755Google Scholar
  13. Chimni BS (2003) Third world approaches to international law: a manifesto. In: Anghie A et al (eds) The third world and international order: law, politics and globalization. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, p 47Google Scholar
  14. Chon M (2006) Intellectual property and the development divide. Cardozo Law Rev 27:2821Google Scholar
  15. Cotter C (2008) The implications of Rwanda’s paragraph 6 agreement with Canada for other developing countries. Loyola Univ Chic Int Law Rev 5:177Google Scholar
  16. Decleris M (2008) The Law of Sustainable Development: general principles. EC, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  17. Dutfield G, Suthersanen U (2008) Global Intellectual Property Law. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  18. Effeh UE (2008) Back to the future: the UNDRD as a blueprint for the realization of human rights and sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa. McGill JSDLP 4:133Google Scholar
  19. Fisher WW, Syed T (2007) Global justice in healthcare: developing drugs for the developing world. UC Davis Law Rev 40:581Google Scholar
  20. Footer ME (2003) Technical Assistance and Trade Law reform post-Doha: brave new world. In: Hatchard J, Perry-Kessaris A (eds) Law and development: facing complexity in the 21st century. Cavendish, London, p 108Google Scholar
  21. Fuentes X (2004) International law-making in the field of sustainable development: the unequal competition between development and the environment. In: Schrijver N, Weiss F (eds) International law and sustainable development. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, p 1Google Scholar
  22. Ganslandt M et al (2005) Developing and distributing essential medicines to poor countries: the DEFEND proposal. In: Fink C, Maskus KE (eds) Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research. Oxford University Press, New York, p 207Google Scholar
  23. WTO General Council (2005) Amendment to the TRIPS Agreement WT/L/641. Online:
  24. Gold ER et al (2004) The unexamined assumptions of intellectual property: adopting an evaluative approach to patenting biotechnological innovation. Public Affairs Q 18(4):299Google Scholar
  25. Gold R et al (2008) Toward a new era of intellectual property: from confrontation to negotiation. A Report from the International Expert Group on Biotechnology, Innovation and Intellectual Property. Online:
  26. Goode W (2003) Dictionary of trade policy terms, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Google Scholar
  27. Habermas J (1987) Theory of communicative action. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Horkheimer M, Adorno TW (1995) In: Cumming J (ed) Dialectic of enlightenment. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Idris K (2003) Intellectual property: a power tool for economic growth, 2nd edn. WIPO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  30. Kihwelo PF (2005) Indigenous knowledge: what is it? How and why do we protect it? J World Intellect Prop 8:345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krajewski M (2001) Democratic legitimacy and constitutional perspectives of WTO. J World Trade 35:186Google Scholar
  32. La Croix S, Liu M (2008) Patents and access to essential medicines. In: Maskus KE (ed) Intellectual property, growth and trade. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lamy P (2005) Trade can be a friend, not a foe, of conservation. In: Speech at WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, 10 October 2005Google Scholar
  34. Lamy P (2006) “Humanizing Globalization” Santiago de Chile, 30 January 2006Google Scholar
  35. Llewelyn M (2005) Schrodinger’s cat: an observation on Modern Patent Law. In: Drahos P (ed) Death of patents. Lawtext, London, p 11Google Scholar
  36. Machlup F (1958) An Economic Review of the Patent System. Study of the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Study No. 15Google Scholar
  37. Mgbeoji I (2006) Global biopiracy: patents, plants, and indigenous knowledge. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  38. Mgbeoji I (2007) TRIPS and TRIPS-Plus Impacts in Africa. In: Gervais DJ (ed) Intellectual property, trade and development: strategies to optimize economic development in a TRIPS-plus era. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 259Google Scholar
  39. Nussbaum MC (1997) Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Rev 66:273Google Scholar
  40. Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oddi AS (1987) The International Patent System and third world development: reality or myth? Duke Law J 63:831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oguamanam C (2008) Local knowledge as trapped knowledge: intellectual property, culture, power and politics. J World Intellect Prop 11:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Okediji RL (2004) Africa and the global intellectual property system: beyond the agency model. Afr YB Int Law 12:207Google Scholar
  44. Penrose ET (1973) The Economics of the International Patent System. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandkjaer B (2007) HIV/AIDS and African sustainable development. McGill JSDLP 3(1):1Google Scholar
  46. Sands P (2003) Principles of International Environmental Law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Segger (2008) Sustainable development in International Law. In: Bugge HC, Voigt C (eds) Sustainable development in International and National Law. Groningen: Europa Law. pp 87Google Scholar
  48. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaffer G et al (2008) The trials of winning at the WTO: what lies behind Brazil’s success. Cornell Int Law J 41:383Google Scholar
  50. Stiglitz JE (2002) Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Stiglitz JE, Charlton A (2005) Fair trade for all: how trade can promote development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Ugandan AIDS Commission (2008) UNGASS Uganda progress country report. Online:
  53. UNAIDS & WHO (2008) Sub-Saharan Africa: AIDS epidemic update regional summary. Online:
  54. UNAIDS (2008a) Ghana situation. Online:
  55. UNAIDS (2008b) Sub-Saharan Africa: AIDS epidemic update. Online:
  56. UNAIDS (2011a) AIDS at 30: nations at the crossroads. Online:
  57. UNAIDS (2011b) Grounding the response in human rights and gender equality. In: AIDS at 30: nations at the crossroads. Online:
  58. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2006) Human development reports. Online:
  59. Voigt C (2009) Sustainable development as a Principle of International Law: resolving conflicts between climate measures and WTO Law. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, p 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wechsler A (2011) Spotlight on China: piracy, enforcement, and the balance dilemma in Intellectual Property Law. In: Kur A, Levin M (eds) Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: proposals for reform of TRIPS. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 61Google Scholar
  61. WHO (2005a) World malaria report. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  62. WHO (2008) World Malaria Report. Online:
  63. WHO (2009) Global tuberculosis control. Online:
  64. Woolf S (2009) Moving beyond the Horror. McGill ReporterGoogle Scholar
  65. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Treaties and Legislation

  1. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights 1994, 33 ILM 81Google Scholar


  1. The First of the Technical Committee on the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plan for Africa (2007) Addis Ababa, TCPMPA/RPT (1) (AU).Google Scholar
  2. UNCTAD. Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development, in World Investment Report (1999).Google Scholar
  3. UNAIDS. AIDS at 30: Nations at the Crossroads (2011).Google Scholar
  4. UNAIDS & WHO. Sub-Saharan Africa: AIDS Epidemic Update Regional Summary UNAIDS/08.08E/JC1526E (2008).Google Scholar
  5. UNAIDS & WHO. AIDS Epidemic Update, UNAIDS/07.27E/JC1322E (Geneva: UNAIDS & WHO, 2007).Google Scholar
  6. Ugandan AIDS Commission, UNGASS Uganda Progress Country Report (2008).Google Scholar
  7. WHO/AFRO, Uganda Country Health Profiles. Google Scholar
  8. WHO, Ghana Annual Report (2005).Google Scholar
  9. WHO, Global Tuberculosis Control (2009).Google Scholar
  10. WHO, World Malaria Report (2008).Google Scholar
  11. Extension of the Transition Period under Article 66.1 of the TRIPS Agreement for LDC Members for Certain Obligations with respect to Pharmaceutical Products, WTO Doc IP/C/25, 1 July 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Extension of the Transition Period under Article 66.1 for Least-Developed Country Members (29 November 2005).Google Scholar
  13. WTO General Council, Amendment to the TRIPS Agreement WT/L/641 (8 December 2005).Google Scholar
  14. UN Millennium Development Goals Report, 2007.Google Scholar


  1. Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Dam Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) (1997) ICJ Rep. 7.Google Scholar
  2. WIPO Development Agenda (2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of GhanaAccraGhana

Personalised recommendations