Advertisement

Abstract

This paper addresses the Minimum Linear Ordering Problem (MLOP): Given a nonnegative set function f on a finite set V, find a linear ordering on V such that the sum of the function values for all the suffixes is minimized. This problem generalizes well-known problems such as the Minimum Linear Arrangement, Min Sum Set Cover, Minimum Latency Set Cover, and Multiple Intents Ranking. Extending a result of Feige, Lovász, and Tetali (2004) on Min Sum Set Cover, we show that the greedy algorithm provides a factor 4 approximate optimal solution when the cost function f is supermodular. We also present a factor 2 rounding algorithm for MLOP with a monotone submodular cost function, using the convexity of the Lovász extension. These are among very few constant factor approximation algorithms for NP-hard minimization problems formulated in terms of submodular/supermodular functions. In contrast, when f is a symmetric submodular function, the problem has an information theoretic lower bound of 2 on the approximability.

Feige, Lovász, and Tetali (2004) also devised a factor 2 LP-rounding algorithm for the Min Sum Vertex Cover. In this paper, we present an improved approximation algorithm with ratio 1.79. The algorithm performs multi-stage randomized rounding based on the same LP relaxation, which provides an answer to their open question on the integrality gap.

Keywords

Greedy Algorithm Submodular Function 50th Annual IEEE Symposium Constant Factor Approximation Algorithm Minimum Linear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Azar, Y., Gamzu, I.: Ranking with submodular valuations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2011, pp. 1070–1079. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azar, Y., Gamzu, I., Yin, X.: Multiple intents re-ranking. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2009, pp. 669–678. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bansal, N., Gupta, A., Krishnaswamy, R.: A constant factor approximation algorithm for generalized min-sum set cover. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2010, pp. 1539–1545. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bar-Yehuda, R., Even, G., Feldman, J., Naor, J.S.: Computing an optimal orientation of a balanced decomposition tree for linear arrangement problems. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 5, 1–27 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barenholz, U., Feige, U., Peleg, D.: Improved approximation for min-sum vertex cover (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charikar, M., Hajiaghayi, M.T., Karloff, H., Rao, S.: l22 spreading metrics for vertex ordering problems. Algorithmica 56(4), 577–604 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chekuri, C., Ene, A.: Approximation algorithms for submodular multiway partition. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2011, pp. 807–816. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Devanur, N.R., Khot, S.A., Saket, R., Vishnoi, N.K.: Integrality gaps for sparsest cut and minimum linear arrangement problems. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2006, pp. 537–546. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feige, U., Lee, J.R.: An improved approximation ratio for the minimum linear arrangement problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 101, 26–29 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feige, U., Lovász, L., Tetali, P.: Approximating min sum set cover. Algorithmica 40, 219–234 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goel, G., Karande, C., Tripathi, P., Wang, L.: Approximability of combinatorial problems with multi-agent submodular cost functions. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2009, pp. 755–764. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassin, R., Levin, A.: An Approximation Algorithm for the Minimum Latency Set Cover Problem. In: Brodal, G.S., Leonardi, S. (eds.) ESA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3669, pp. 726–733. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horton, S.B.: The Optimal Linear Arrangement Problem: Algorithms and Approximation. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (1997), AAI9735901Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Im, S., Nagarajan, V., van der Zwaan, R.: Minimum latency submodular cover (manuscript, 2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwata, S., Nagano, K.: Submodular function minimization under covering constraints. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2009, pp. 671–680. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lovász, L.: Submodular functions and convexity. In: Mathematical Programming — The State of the Art, pp. 235–257. Springer (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petit, J.: Experiments on the minimum linear arrangement problem. J. Exp. Algorithmics 8 (December 2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao, S., Richa, A.W.: New approximation techniques for some ordering problems. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 1998, pp. 211–218. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Svitkina, Z., Fleischer, L.: Submodular approximation: Sampling-based algorithms and lower bounds. SIAM J. Comput. 40(6), 1715–1737 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satoru Iwata
    • 1
  • Prasad Tetali
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pushkar Tripathi
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute for Mathematical SciencesKyoto UniversityJapan
  2. 2.School of MathematicsGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUSA
  3. 3.School of Computer ScienceGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations