Porosity and Pore-Size Distribution of Geomaterials from X-ray CT Scans

  • H. S. Shin
  • K. Y. Kim
  • G. N. Pande
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)


Determination of transport properties of geomaterials is an important issue in many fields of engineering analysis and design. For example, in petroleum engineering, permeability of an oil reservoir may be crucial in establishing its viability for exploitation whilst prevention of leakage from underground storage facilities for oils and gas, nuclear waste as well as CO2 crucially depends on its long term values. Permeability is an illusive parameter which is difficult to obtain not only in field situations but also in controlled laboratory environment. Its determination is further complicated by the fact that values are needed for low permeability porous media such as clays/rocks at various degrees of saturation and at elevated temperatures which makes physical experiments not only expensive but also difficult and time-consuming. Permeability is indirectly related to the porosity, pore-size distribution and pore-architecture. A well-known way to obtain this information is through mercury porosimetery but this procedure has safety issues associated with it. Moreover, it is not an easy experiment to conduct. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of micro X-ray CT scanning technique to obtain porosity and its variation in clays. Since the resolution of micro CT equipment is not high enough to be able to observe specific pores in clays, an experimental programme to correlate porosity with data from scanning was undertaken. It consisted of consolidating specimens made from a mixture of kaolinite and bentonite in an oedometer, unloading them and obtaining 32mm samples from various locations, scanning them as well as determining void ratio of these specimens using standard laboratory procedures. It is observed that the Average CT Number (ACTN) for the specimens correlated well with the porosity (void ratio) whilst spatial variation of CT numbers seems to indicate the capability of scanners to capture pore size distribution. This indicates the possibility of computing permeability of low porosity media through CT imaging.


Void Ratio Linear Attenuation Coefficient Clay Specimen Control Laboratory Environment High Void Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alshibli, K.A., Batiste, S., Sture, S.: Strain Localization in Sand: Plane Strain versus Triaxial Compression. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129(6), 483–494 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fox, P.J., Berles, J.D.: CS2: A piecewise-linear model for large strain consolidation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 21, 453–475 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Peyton, R.L., Haeffner, B.A., Anderson, S.H., Ganzer, C.J.: Applying X-ray CT to measure micropore diameters in undisturbed soil cores. Geoderma 53, 329–340 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ketcham, R.A., Carlson, W.D.: Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences. Computers & Geosciences 27, 381–400 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Riyadh, A.R., Khalid, A.A.: Distribution of local void ratio in porous media systems from 3D X-ray micro tomography images. Physica A 361, 441–456 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Tollner, E.W., Melear, N.D., Rodriguez, L.A., Wright, M.E.: Soil Aggregate Size Distributions Using X-Ray Images. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 41(4), 1207–1215 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. Wong, R.C.K.: Shear Deformation of locked Sand in Triaxial Compression. Geotechnical Testing Journal 23(2), 158–170 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geotechnical Eng. Research Dept.Korea Institute of Const. Tech. (KICT)GoyangRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Centre for Civil & Computational EngineeringSwansea UniversityWalesUK
  3. 3.President, International Centre for Computational EngineeringRhodesGreece

Personalised recommendations