Advertisement

Classification Conflicts and Options for Reform

  • Sven-Eric Bärsch
Chapter

Abstract

As has been pointed out above, there is a significant lack of consistency in the currently applicable tax classifications of hybrid financial instruments and the remuneration derived therefrom between the examined countries themselves. In principle, this is based on the distinctive characteristics of these instruments which are differently decisive for the purposes of domestic law, income tax treaties and EU Directives.

Keywords

Source Country Double Taxation Preference Share Debt Instrument Relevant Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Avi-Yonah R, Chenchinski AC (2010) The case for dividend deduction. In: University of Michigan public law and legal theory working paper series, Working paper no. 220Google Scholar
  2. Blessing PH (2012) The debt-equity conundrum – a prequel. Bullr Int Tax 198–212Google Scholar
  3. Bourke GG (2004) Drawing a sharp line in the sand of the debt/equity desert – division 974 – oasis or mirage?. Aust Tax Rev 24–58Google Scholar
  4. Bruins Slot W (1996) De bank als houder van cumulatief preferent aandelenkapitaal. Weekblad fiscaal recht 1625–1636Google Scholar
  5. Burns L and O’Donnell P (2000) National report of Australia. In: IFA (ed) Tax treatment of hybrid financial instruments in cross-border transactions, vol 85a. The Hague, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  6. Code of Conduct Subgroup (2010) Report of the code of conduct (business taxation) subgroup, 12.5.2010, Council document 9779/10 FISC 43. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/10/st09/st09779.en10.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2012
  7. Cottani G, Liebentritt M (2008) Tier 1 capital instruments: regulatory and tax issues. Deriv Financ Instrum 62–74Google Scholar
  8. De Mooij RA, Devereux MP (2011) An applied analysis of ACE and CBIT reforms in the EU. Int Tax Public Financ 93–120Google Scholar
  9. Devereux MP, Freeman H (1991) A general neutral profits tax. Fiscal Stud 1–15Google Scholar
  10. Duncan JA (2000) General report. In: IFA (ed) Tax treatment of hybrid financial instruments in cross-border transactions, vol 85a. The Hague, pp 21–34Google Scholar
  11. Feuerherdt C, Gray S, Hall J, (2010) The value of imputation tax credits on Australian hybrid securities. Int Rev Financ 365–401Google Scholar
  12. Feyerabend H-J, Houzer F (1999) Germany. Int Tax Rev, 7 et seqGoogle Scholar
  13. Institute for Fiscal Studies (1991) Equity for companies: a corporation tax for the 1990s. http://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/comm26.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2012
  14. Jacob F (2000a) National report of Germany. In: IFA (ed) Tax treatment of hybrid financial instruments in cross-border transactions, vol 85a. The Hague, pp 313–348Google Scholar
  15. Jacob F (2000b) German tax treatment of hybrid financial instruments in cross-border transactions. Bull Int Fiscal Doc 442–454Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs OH, Endres D, Spengel C (eds) (2011) Internationale Unternehmensbesteuerung, Deutsche Investitionen im Ausland – Ausländische Investitionen im Inland, 7th edn. MunichGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansen E, van Kasteren E (2008) Hybrid financial instruments. Deriv Financ Instrum 175–188Google Scholar
  18. Joseph A (2006b) Securization, capital adequacy and impact of IFRS, FASB 140 and FIN 46R. Deriv Financ Instrum 231–235Google Scholar
  19. Joseph A (2006c) Venture capital investment and holding companies. Asia-Pac Tax Bull 86–93Google Scholar
  20. Kessler W, Kröner M, Köhler S (eds) (2008) Konzernsteuerrecht, 2nd edn. MunichGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraay N, Bloom, L (2012) The missing link: transfer pricing and regulatory capital compliance for global financial institutions. Tax Notes Int 527–531Google Scholar
  22. Krause M (2012) Basel III: the regulatory framework. Deriv Financ Instrum 11–16Google Scholar
  23. Lühn M (2006a) Bilanzierung und Besteuerung von Genussrechten. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  24. Neilson T (1999) The end of redeemable preference shares. J Aust Tax 149–154Google Scholar
  25. OECD (2012) Hybrid mismatch arrangements. ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Pratt K (2000) The debt-equity distinction in a second-best world. Vanderbilt Law Rev 1055–1158Google Scholar
  27. Schlunk HJ (2000) The zen of corporate capital structure neutrality. Mich Law Rev 410–451Google Scholar
  28. Siebel UR (1997) Vorzugsaktien als “Hybride” Finanzierungsform und ihre Grenzen. Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht 628–664Google Scholar
  29. Spengel C (2003) Internationale Unternehmensbesteuerung in der Europäischen Union. Steuerwirkungsanalysen – Empirische Befunde – Reformüberlegungen. DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  30. Toryanik T (2009) Deduction generator arrangements. Deriv Financ Instrum 169–172Google Scholar
  31. Tripoli PF (2011) Turin tax court denies treaty residence state dividend exemption absent source taxation. No country for economic double taxation relief?. Eur Tax 260–262Google Scholar
  32. US Department of the Treasury (1992) Integration of the individual and corporate tax systems, taxing business income once. http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/Documents/integration.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2012
  33. Van Gelder GCF (2011) De fiscal impact van preferente aandelen. Weekblad fiscaal recht 653–659Google Scholar
  34. Vernimmen P et al (2009) Corporate finance: theory and practice, 2nd edn. West SussexGoogle Scholar
  35. Vitali ML (2006) Classes of shares and share redemption in Italian and UK company law: the peculiar case of the redeemable shares. Electron J Comp Law 1–39Google Scholar
  36. Wagner S (2005c) Bilanzierungsfragen und steuerliche Aspekte bei “hybriden” Finanzierungen. Der Konzern 499–510Google Scholar
  37. Warner CJF (2000) National report of the Netherlands. In: IFA (ed) Tax treatment of hybrid financial instruments in cross-border transactions, vol 85a. The Hague, pp 503–527Google Scholar
  38. Warren AC Jr (1974) The corporate interest deduction: a policy evaluation. Yale Law J 1585–1619Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business School Chair of International TaxationUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations