Professionalism in Business: Insights from Ancient Philosophy

  • Lila Despotidou
  • Gregory P. Prastacos


Business schools have the responsibility to inspire professional culture in future managers. This means that they have to provide them not only with the expertise, knowledge and skills required in their field of specialization, but also with a sense of responsibility toward others and society at large. This need has been increasingly evident during the period of the global financial crisis, and a number of initiatives have been reported by business schools worldwide to address the issue.

In this paper we examine the issue of professionalism in business management from two perspectives: business practice, and relation to ancient philosophy. Drawing from the literature, we propose a framework defining professionalism as composed of three patterns: (a) possession of a systematic body of knowledge, (b) commitment to a good broader than self-interest, and (c) an overall ethical character of the activity and ethical conduct. We show how these patterns are reflected to the expectations that corporations have from business practitioners. We further demonstrate that substantial elements of business professionalism are strongly related to core values and principles introduced in the social and political thought of ancient philosophers, and thus suggest that ancient philosophy could be used as a means for inspiring professionalism in business managers.


Stakeholder Theory Corporate Social Performance Practical Wisdom Moral Virtue Business Conduct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Andrews, K. (1969). Toward professionalism in business management. Harvard Business Review, 47(2), 49–60.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R. (2010). No, management is not a profession. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 52–60.Google Scholar
  3. Bartol, K., & Martin, D. (1998). Management (international edition) (3rd ed.). New York: Irvin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Benetatou, M. (2011). Confucian and Aristotelian ethics: A global model for leadership. In Proceedings of international conference on ‘Leadership and management in a changing world: Aristotle and Confucius in modern society’, Athens.Google Scholar
  5. Billsberry, J., & Birnik, A. (2010). Management as a contextual practice: The need to blend science, skills and practical wisdom. Organization Management Journal, 7(2), 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn, M., & McGee, P. (2004). Talking virtue: Professionalism in business and virtue ethics. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 5(4), 90–122.Google Scholar
  7. Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandeis, L.D. (1912). Business – A profession. An address delivered at Brown university commencement day, 1912 (published in System, October 1912).
  9. Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2011). The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for east and west. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, D. (1987). Aristotle and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(7), 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, T. (2000). Are business managers ‘professionals’? Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  13. Donham, P. (1962). Is management a profession? Harvard Business Review, 40(5), 60–68.Google Scholar
  14. Duncan, J. (1971). Professionalism in management and the history of administrative thought: Comment. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. George, J., & Jones, G. (2004). Understanding and managing organizational behaviour (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Gilman, S. (2005). Ethics codes and codes of conduct as tools for promoting an ethical and professional public service: Comparative successes and lessons. Washington, DC: Prepared for the PREM, World Bank. Winter.Google Scholar
  18. Giovanola, B. & Fermani A. (2011). Ethics, economic organization, and human flourishing: Lessons from Plato and Aristotle. In Proceedings of international conference on ‘Leadership and management in a changing world: Aristotle and Confucius in modern society’, Athens.Google Scholar
  19. Gordon, K. & Maiko, M. (1999). Deciphering codes of corporate conduct: A review of their contents. Working papers on international investment: Number 1999/2, organization for economic co-operation and development (OECD), directorate for financial, fiscal and enterprise affairs.
  20. Guth, W., Steinman, M., Stohr, E., & Jin, H. (2011). White paper. Teaching normative ethical theory using an online quiz. Stevens Institute of Technology, Howe School of Technology Management.Google Scholar
  21. Hooker J. (1996). Toward professional ethics in business. Tepper School of Business. Paper 184.
  22. Hooker, J. (2007). Professional ethics: Does it matter which hat we wear? Journal of Business Ethics Education, 4, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kantrowitz, T. (2005). Development and construct validation of a measure of skills performance. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology – Department of Psychology, Atlanta.
  24. Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khurana, R., & Nohria, N. (2008). It’s time to make management a true profession. Harvard Business Review, 10, 70–77.Google Scholar
  26. Khurana, R., Nohria, N., & Penrice, D. (2005). Management as a profession. In J. Lorsch, A. Zelleke, & L. Berlowitz (Eds.), Restoring trust in American business (pp. 43–62). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  27. Kodish, S. (2006). The Paradoxes of leadership: The contribution of Aristotle. Leadership, 2(4), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melé, D. (2012). The Christian notion of Αγάπη (agápē): Towards a more complete view of business ethics. In P. Prastacos, F. Wang & E. Soderquist (Eds.), Leadership through the Classics: Learning management and leadership from ancient East and West philosophy. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  29. Mintz, S. (1996). Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(8), 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 163–176.Google Scholar
  31. Moss, P. & Tilly, C. (1995). ‘Soft’ skills and race: An investigation of black men’s employment problems. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  32. Nurmi, R. (1984). Aristotle and management. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 1, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2001). Codes of corporate conduct: Expanded review of their contents. Directorate for financial, fiscal and enterprise affairs, Working papers on international investment, number 2001/6.
  34. Palencia, L. (2006). Pathways to professionalism. Presentation at the Association of MBAs 8th annual conference, Noordwijk, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  35. Parkan, B. (2008). Professionalism: A virtue or estrangement from self-activity? Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelegrino, E. (2002). Professionalism, profession and the virtues of the good physician. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 69(6), 378–384.Google Scholar
  37. Purkerson Hammer, D. (2000). Professional attitudes and behaviors: The ‘A’s and ‘B’s of professionalism. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64, 455–464.Google Scholar
  38. Rarick, C. (2007). Confucius and management: Understanding Chinese cultural values and managerial practices. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(2), 22–28.Google Scholar
  39. Shah, N., Anderson, J., & Humphrey, H. (2008). Teaching professionalism: A tale of three schools. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(4), 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Solomon, R. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organizational Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens, B. (1994). An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. C. W. (1995). Politics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Trank, C., & Rynes, S. (2003). Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.Google Scholar
  45. Woods, P., & Lamond, D. (2011). What would Confucius do? – Confucian ethics and self-regulation in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu, J. (1998). Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle. Philosophy East & West, 48(2), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, C. (2011). Confucianism and market economy. In Proceedings of international conference on ‘Leadership and management in a changing world: Aristotle and Confucius in modern society’, Athens.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  2. 2.Howe School of Technology ManagementStevens Institute of TechnologyHobokenUSA

Personalised recommendations