The Mandala Model of Power and Leadership: A Southeast Asian Perspective

Chapter

Abstract

The philosophy and religious tradition of Southeast Asia has not yet been considered in leadership theory. The philosophical strength of Southeast Asia is adaptation, change and flexibility. This article argues that modern leadership theory should include these strengths. It does so for the context of cross-cultural leadership, a context that requires empathy, ambiguity tolerance and the ability to change perspective. The contribution is conceptual: First, I present two Southeast Asian models of leadership, namely the mandala model of power and the model of substitutional harmony between micro- and macrocosmos. Second, I link them to cross-cultural leadership theory. From this, I derive the mandala model of intercultural leadership and draw conclusions for leadership theory.

Keywords

Cultural Dimension Leadership Style Leadership Theory Spiritual Leadership Indigenous Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alves, J. C., Manz, C. C., & Butterfield, D. A. (2005). Developing leadership theory in Asia: The role of Chinese philosophy. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, R. T. (2003). Yin and Yang. In A. Cua (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy (pp. 846–847). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3–15). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Aung-Twin, M. (1995). The ‘classical’ in Southeast Asia: The past in the present. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 26(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, C., Johnson, A., & Lavalette, M. (2001). Leadership matters: An introduction. In C. Barker, A. Johnson, & M. Lavalette (Eds.), Leadership and social movements (pp. 1–23). Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, M. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. (1991). The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16, 262–290.Google Scholar
  9. Burns, J. (2005). Leadership. Leadership, 1(1), 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Hants: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, C.-Y. (2003a). Philosophy of change. In A. Cua (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy (pp. 517–524). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cheng, C.-Y. (2003b). Philosophy of knowledge. In A. Cua (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy (pp. 558–569). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Chokar, J., Brodbeck, F., & House, R. (Eds.). (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Chong, A. (2007). Southeast Asia: Theory between modernization and tradition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colombijn, A. (2003). The volatile state in Southeast Asia: Evidence from Sumatra, 1600–1800. Journal of Asian Studies, 62(2), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Czarniawska, B. (2008). Organizing: How to study it and how to write about it. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 3(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 729–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K., Tate, U., & Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emmerson, D. K. (1984). Southeast Asia: What’s in a name? Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitfield, R. H. (1976). Southeast Asian studies: Origins, development, future. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 7(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fry, L. W. (2005). Introduction to the Leadership Quarterly special issue: Toward a paradigm of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 619–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner, H., & Laskin, E. (1995). Leading minds: an anatomy of leadership. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, D. G. E. (1994). A history of Southeast Asia (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (1995). Anticipating China: Thinking through the narratives of Chinese and western cultures. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, D. L., & Ames, R. T. (1998). Thinking from the Han: Self, truth, and transcendence in Chinese and western culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  28. Heine-Geldern, R. (1942). Conceptions of state and kingship in Southeast Asia. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 2(2), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henley, D. (2004). Conflict, justice, and the stranger-king: Indigenous roots of colonial rule in Indonesia and elsewhere. Modern Asian Studies, 38(1), 85–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies 40(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Javidan, M., House, R., & Dorfman, W. (2004). A nontechnical summary of GLOBE findings. In R. House et al. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations – The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 29–48). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S., & Bourque, N. (2010). The ritualization of strategy workshops. Organization Studies, 31(12), 1589–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2001). The leadership mystique. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Kimura, E. (2010). Changing the rules: Historical conjuncture and transition in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 51(3), 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kriger, M., & Seng, Y. (2005). Leadership with inner meaning: A contingency theory of leadership based on the worldviews of five religions. Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 771–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lansing, J. S. (1983). The ‘Indianization’ of Bali. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 14(2), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewis, R. (2000). When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  43. Mabbett, I. W. (1969). Devaraja. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 10(2), 202–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moser, B. (2010). Putrajaya: Malaysia’s new federal administrative capital. Cities, 27(4), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mulder, N. (1996). Inside Southeast Asia: Religion, everyday life, cultural change. Amsterdam/Kuala Lumpur: Pepin Press.Google Scholar
  46. Peck, E., & Dickinson, H. (2009). Performing Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson, M. F., & Hunt, J. G. (1997). International perspectives on international leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pittinsky, T. L., & Zhu, C. (2005). Contemporary public leadership in China: A research review and consideration. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(6), 921–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Primecz, H., Romani, L., & Sackmann, S. (2009). Cross-cultural management research: Contributions from various paradigms. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3), 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pun, K. F., Chin, K. S., & Lau, H. (2000). A review of the Chinese cultural influences on Chinese enterprise management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sackmann, S., & Phillips, M. (2004). Contextual influences on culture research: Shifting assumptions for new workplace realities. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4(3), 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. SarDesai, D. R. (1997). Southeast Asia: Past and present. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  53. Scandura, T., & Dorfman, P. (2004). Leadership research in an international and cross-cultural context. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Shun, K.-I. (2003). Philosophy of human nature. In A. Cua (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy (pp. 554–558). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, P. B., & Peterson, M. F. (1988). Leadership, organizations and culture: An event management model. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Solheim, W. H., II. (1985). Southeast Asia: What’s in a name? Another point of view. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16(1), 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steinberg, D. J. (Ed.). (1987). In search of Southeast Asia: A modern history. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  61. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in global business. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  62. Van Maanen, J. (1998). Qualitative studies of organizations. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Wang, R. R. (Ed.). (2004). Chinese philosophy in an era of globalization. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  64. Weick, K. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Whittington, R. (2003). The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 117–125.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, A. (2008). The sacred geography of Bangkok’s markets. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Winzeler, R. L. (1976). Ecology, culture, social organization, and state formation in Southeast Asia. Current Anthropology, 17(4), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wolters, O. W. (1999/1982). History, culture and region in Southeast Asian perspectives. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  69. Womack, B. (2003). China and Southeast Asia: Asymmetry, leadership and normalcy. Pacific Affairs, 76(4), 529–534.Google Scholar
  70. Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringPforzheim UniversityPforzheimGermany

Personalised recommendations