Advertisement

Maximization of What? Revisiting the Conception of Wisdom from a Buddhist Perspective

  • Wen-Chin KanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Self-interest is an important conception in Hobbesian political philosophy and classic economics. Both theories hold that rational choice to maximize interests is the best strategy to generate optimal outcome. This paper presents three arguments leading to the conclusion that the business goal set to strive for maximization of self-interest is nonmoral. What is characterized as immoral is business action that causes others harm, or fails to help others under certain morally-relevant conditions. The first argument explicates a modified stakeholder framework that enables us to explore the nexus of self- and others-interest at three different yet interconnected levels. The second argument proposes that the maximization of wisdom is the best strategy to maximize authentic self-interest in the light of Buddhist philosophy. Wisdom can be expressed as cause management, a managerial capability that needs to be cultivated not only to enhance individual lives but to wisely foresee business outcomes. The last argument provides two basic principles founded on karma theory and corresponding rules to cultivate maximization of wisdom, which can enhance the lives of individuals and positive value of businesses.

Keywords

Stakeholder Theory Good Fortune Knowledge Management System Common Morality Buddhist Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & Colle, S. D. (Eds.). (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gauthier, D. P. (1986). Morals by agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Sen, A. K. (1997). Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica, 65(4), 745–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sen, A. K. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Taisho Tripitaka Vol. 30, No. 1564, CBETA Chinese Electronic Tripitaka V1.15, http://www.cbeta.org/result/normal/T30/1564_003.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of PhilosophyNational Central UniversityJhongliTaiwan

Personalised recommendations