A Conceptual Architecture for Business-Aware Transaction Management

  • Michael Parkin
  • Mike P. Papazoglou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7350)

Abstract

Service-Based Applications (SBAs) are created by composing and orchestrating software services into cross-organizational business processes that can execute multiple business-aware transactions. A business-aware transaction must not only ensure data consistency but also coordinate the heterogeneous information systems of separate businesses that typically use different business practices, policies, equipment and technologies so the transaction can complete successfully. However, the lack of a clear approach to managing this class of transaction means management capabilities are often ‘hard-wired’ into the SBA, rendering the potential reuse and customization of SBAs difficult, if not impossible. This paper reviews the functions required for the creation, management and adaptation of them and presents a conceptual architecture with the aim of identifying, at a high-level, functional and technological components of a distributed software architecture to allow Business-Aware Transaction Management and the customization and reuse of SBAs.

Keywords

Business Process Service Composition Service Level Agreement Business Function Electronic Marketplace 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Conceptual architecture. Wikipedia ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    4CaaSt Consortium. 4CaaSt: Vision. Technical reportGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Masri, E., Mahmoud, Q.H.: Investigating Web Services on the World Wide Web. In: Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference. Web Engineering - Web Service Deployment Track, pp. 795–804 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amit, R., Zott, C.: Value Creation in eBusiness. Strategic Management 22, 493–520 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrikopoulos, V. (ed.): Separate Design Knowledge Models for Software Engineering & Service-Based Computing. Contractual Deliverable CD-JRA-1.1.2, S-Cube Network of Excellence (December 2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bakos, Y.: The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet. Communications of the ACM 41, 35–42 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barros, A., Dumas, M., Bruza, P.: The Move to Web Service Ecosystems. BPTrends (November 2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breininger, K. (TC Chair): ebXML Registry Information Model v2.1. OASIS Approved Committee Specification (June 2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalal, S., Temel, S., Little, M., Potts, M., Webber, J.: Coordinating Business Transactions on the Web. IEEE Internet Computing 7(1), 30–39 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dudstar, S., Treiber, M.: A View Based Analysis on Web Service Registries. Distributed and Parallel Databases 2, 18Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feingold, M., Jeyaraman, R. (eds.): Web Services Coordination. Standard Version 1.2, OASIS (February 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geng, X., Huang, Y., Whinston, A.: Smart Marketplaces: A Step Beyond Web Services. Information Systems and E-Business Management 1, 15–34 (2003), 10.1007/BF02683508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Google Code University. Introduction to Distributed System Design, http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/dsd-tutorial.html
  14. 14.
    Gray, J., Reuter, A.: Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haque, R. (ed.): Business Transaction Language. Contractual Deliverable CD-JRA-2.1.3, S-Cube Network of Excellence (December 2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    HP, IBM, Software AG and TIBCO. SOA Repository Artifact Model & Protocol (S-RAMP) — Downloads (October 2010), http://s-ramp.org/downloads.html
  17. 17.
    IBM, BEA Systems, Microsoft, Arjuna, Hitachi, and IONA. Web Services Transactions Specifications. Technical report (November 2004), http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-tx/
  18. 18.
    Kawamoto, D.: Amazon files for Web services patent. CNET News (July 2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kratz, B.: Protocols for Long-Running Business Transactions. Technical Report 17, Infolab (February 2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liang, A., Parkin, M.: High-quality Business Processes based on Multi-dimensional QoS. In: Performance and Dependability in Service Computing: Concepts, Techniques and Research Directions. IOS Press (April 2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luckham, D., Frasca, B.: Complex Event Processing in Distributed Systems. Technical Report CSL-TR-98-754, Stanford University (March 1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michlmayr, A., Rosenberg, F., Platzer, C., Treiber, M., Dustdar, S.: Towards Recovering the Broken SOA Triangle – A Software Engineering Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Service Oriented Software Engineering, pp. 22–28 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Kratz, B.: A Business-Aware Web Services Transaction Model. In: Dan, A., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4294, pp. 352–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parkin, M., Kuo, D., Brooke, J.M., MacCulloch, A.: Challenges in EU Grid Contracts. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th eChallenges Conference, pp. 67–75 (October 2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    SAP Ag. Enterprise Services Repository & Registry, http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-esr
  26. 26.
    Sure, Y.: The Internet of Services. Presentation, CEC Karlsruhe SAP Research, Vienna, Austria (May 2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taher, Y., Marie-Christine, F., Dumas, M., Benslimane, D.: Using CEP TEchnology to Adapt Messages Exchanged by Web Services. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW 2008), pp. 1231–1232 (April 2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tselentis, G., Domingue, J., Galis, A., Gavras, A., Hausheer, D., Krco, S., Lotz, V., Theodore, Z. (eds.) : Towards the Future Internet — A European Research Perspective. IOS Press (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turetken, O., Elgammal, A., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Papazoglou, M.: Enforcing Compliance on Business Processes through the use of Patterns. In: Proeccdings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2011 (2011) (to be published)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waeldrich, O., Battré, D., Brazier, F., Clark, K., Oey, M., Papaspyrou, A., Wieder, P., Ziegler, W.: WS-Agreement Negotiation Version 1.0. Recomendation, Open Grid Forum (May 2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, T., Vonk, J., Kratz, B., Grefen, P.: A Survey on the History of Transaction Management: From Flat to Grid Transactions. Distributed and Parallel Databases 23(3), 235–270 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, Y., van den Heuvel, W.-J.: Towards a Hybrid Simulation Modelling Framework for Service Networks. In: Cezon, M., Wolfsthal, Y. (eds.) ServiceWave 2010 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 6569, pp. 119–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yachin, D.: Business Transaction Management: Another Step in the Evolution of IT Management. Technology Assessment IDC #EMT1P, IDC CEMA (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Parkin
    • 1
  • Mike P. Papazoglou
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Institute in Service Science (ERISS)Tilburg UniversityNetherlands

Personalised recommendations