The core business of insurance is the undertaking of risk by insurers for reward in the form of premiums. In the realm of aviation insurance, airlines, aviation products manufacturers and other service providers typically contract with insurance companies to cover the risks attendant to their operations by way of hull and liability policies. Hull policies usually provide for replacement or repair of the insured aircraft at the insurer’s expense, whereas liability policies cover the insured’s liability to third parties arising from the use of the aircraft or the air transport services provided. However, not all risks can be comprehensively insured by the conventional insurance market. Whereas some types of risk are generally considered to be outright uninsurable, other types may be insurable but only to some extent.


Systemic Risk Insurance Market Liability Policy International Civil Aviation Organization Draft Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 2761 EH (2007) Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act of 2007. (U.S.)Google Scholar
  2. 310 UNTS 181, ICAO Doc. 7364 (1952) Convention on Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to Third Parties on the SurfaceGoogle Scholar
  3. A bigger bang for your buck (2006). Airfinance Journal No. 289:24–26Google Scholar
  4. Airline group files to form Vermont risk group (2002). Insurance Times, 11 June 2002Google Scholar
  5. Atkins S (2007) State involvement in provision of terrorism insurance. In: Marangos H (ed) War risks and terrorism. Insurance Institute of London, London, pp 132–145Google Scholar
  6. Aviation Insurance Clauses Group (2005) Terms of reference (17th March 2005). Available via
  7. Aviation Insurance Clauses Group (2006a) Aviation manufacturers products liabilities endorsement (AVN 52P, 27th February 2006). Available via
  8. Aviation Insurance Clauses Group (2006b) Extended coverage endorsement (aviation liabilities) (AVN 52K, 4th August 2006). Available via
  9. Baur P, Enz R (2003) Sigma no. 5/2003: reinsurance – a systemic risk? Swiss Reinsurance Company, Economic Research and Consulting, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplan H (2004) War and terrorism insurance: how to promote long-term international stability and affordability. Air Space Law XXIX(1):3Google Scholar
  11. Caplan H (2006) The Aviation Insurance Clauses Group: a model for other markets. Air Space Law XXXI(4–5):254–290Google Scholar
  12. Caplan H (2007) Who should pay for aerial terrorism? – challenges to ICAO policy initiatives. Air Space Law 21(3):11–16Google Scholar
  13. De Bandt O, Hartmann P (2000) Systemic risk: a survey. ECB, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  14. De Mey J (2003) The aftermath of September 11: the impact on and systemic risk to the insurance industry. Geneva Papers (Issues & Practice) 28(1):65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Export Import Bank of the United States (2001) Ex-Im Bank responds to airline insurance crisis in the wake of September 11 2001 terrorist attacks. September 24 2001. Available via
  16. Fitzsimmons A (2004) Terrorism – maximizing the insurability of a catastrophe risk. Ann Air Space Law XXIX:67Google Scholar
  17. Harding J, Hart D, Tippin P, Widdows J, Johnston C, Power R (2000) The aviation and space insurance market. Institute of Actuaries, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  18. ICAO (2002) Summary of decisions – assistance in the field of aviation war risk insurance (Subject No. 24.3). No. C-DEC 165/6Google Scholar
  19. International Underwriting Association (IUA), Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) (2005) Aviation Insurance Clauses Group Established. No. 015/0605, 24 June 2005. Available via
  20. Jennison M (2005) Rescuing the Rome convention of 1952: six decades of effort to make a workable regime for damage caused by foreign aircraft to third parties. Unif Law Rev 10(4):785–824Google Scholar
  21. Laster DS, Schmidt C (2005) Sigma no. 4/2005: innovating to insure the uninsurable. Swiss Reinsurance Company, Economic Research and Consulting, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  22. Margo RD (2000) Aviation insurance: the law and practice of aviation insurance, including hovercraft and spacecraft insurance, 3rd edn. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Margo RD (2002) 11 September 2001 – an aviation insurance perspective. Air Space Law XXVII(6):386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marsh Inc. (2006) Marsh/IATA/AEA sponsored liability WMD write-back clauses now finalised by AICG. Marsh Aviation and Aerospace Practice Special BulletinGoogle Scholar
  25. Miranda MJ, Glauber JW (1997) Systematic risk, reinsurance, and the failure of crop insurance markets. Am J Agric Econ 79(1):206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mundy C (2004) The nature of risk: the nature of systemic risk – trying to achieve a definition. Balance Sheet 12(5):29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Partridge J (2001) Ottawa flies to fill gap in air insurance. The Globe and Mail, 24 September 2001Google Scholar
  28. Pub L 110-160, 121 Stat. 1839-1843 (2007) Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007. (US)Google Scholar
  29. Pub. L. No. 107-297 116 STAT. 2327 15 U.S.C. 6701 note (2002) Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. (US)Google Scholar
  30. Pub. L. No. 107-42 115 STAT. 230 (2001) Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act. (USA)Google Scholar
  31. Pub. L. No. 109-144 119 STAT. 2660 15 U.S.C. 6701 note (2005) Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act of 2005. (US)Google Scholar
  32. Q.B.D. (Comm) 571 Companhia de Seguros Imperio v. Heath (REBX) LtdGoogle Scholar
  33. JLT Risk Solutions (2006) The Hull War market. JLT risk solutions aerospace market update – plane talking 3Google Scholar
  34. Stewart S (2001) Ottawa covers air Insurance: 90-day emergency aid: gives airlines, airports coverage against terrorism. National Post, 24 September 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaw Otu Mankata Nyampong
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations