Advertisement

European Neighbourhood Policy and The EU’s Role as a Normative Power: The Case of Ukraine

  • Özgür Ünal Eris
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

With its aspirations to be a global power, the European Union designed the European Neighbourhood Policy with the main aim of having an impact on democratisation in its neighbouring countries. This chapter elaborates the shortcomings of this policy in detail, through a case study of its inadequate impact on democratisation and stabilisation in Ukraine, one of the EU’s most important neighbourhood partners. This chapter also aims to reveal the contradiction between the EU’s normative vision and its security demands, and explore whether this policy supports the EU’s security needs or rather supplements the extension of its normative vision into its periphery.

Keywords

Euro Zone European Neighbourhood Policy External Governance Accession Conditionality Democracy Promotion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aydın, M., & Kaptanoğlu N. (2008). Regionalisation of great power security-near Abroad, Broader Middle East, and European Neighbourhood. Hexagan Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, 3 no. 8Google Scholar
  2. Batt, J. (2003). The EU’s New borderlands, working paper. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
  3. Börzel, T. & van Hüllen, V. (2011, March 3–5). Good governance and bad neighbours. The end of transformative power Europe? Paper presented at the EUSA Biennial International Conference in BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Browning, C., & Joenniemi, P. (2008). Geostrategies of the European neighbourhood policy. European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christian, M. W., & Thomas, P. (2002). The demand-side politics of EU enlargement: Democracy and the application of EU membership. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 550–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dannreuther, R. (2004). European union foreign and security policy: Towards a New neighbourhood strategy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Duchene, F. (1973). The European community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In M. Kohnstamm & W. Hager (Eds.), A nation writ large? Foreign policy problems before the European community. Basingtsoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Gawrich, A., Melnykovska, I., & Schweickert, R. (2010). Neighbourhood europeanisation through ENP: The case of Ukraine. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1209–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haukkala, H. (2009). The European union as a regional normative hegemon: The case of European neighbourhood policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(9), 1601–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hettne, B., Inotai, A., & Sunkel, O. (1999). Globalism and the New regionalism, volume I. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Kuzio, T. (2003). EU and Ukraine: a turning point in 2004? Institute for Security Studies Occasional Papers No. 47Google Scholar
  12. Lavenex, S. (2004). EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lavenex, S. (2008). A governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: integration beyond conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magen, A. (2006). The shadow of enlargement: Can the European neighbourhod policy achieve compliance? Colombia Journal of European Law, 12(2), 384–427.Google Scholar
  15. Manners, I. (2008). The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs, 84(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mattli, W., & Plümper, T. (2002). The Demand-Side Politics of EU Enlargement: Democracy and the Application for EU membership, Journal of European Public Policy 9, 550–74.Google Scholar
  17. Molchanov, M. (2004). Ukraine and the European union: A perennial neighbour? European Integration, 26(4), 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Protsyk, O. (2003). Political institutions and public policies: The effect of institutional choices on legislative decision-making practices in Ukraine and Russia, http://www.policy.hu/protsyk/FinalResearchpaperdraft.pdf
  19. Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Europeanization beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance, 4(3).Google Scholar
  20. Schimmelfennig, F., & Scholtz, H. (2008). EU democracy promotion in the European neighbourhood. European Union Politics, 9(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2002). Theorising EU enlargement: Research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 500–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of central and eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The europeanisaton of central and eastern Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, K. (2005). The outsiders: The European neighbourhood Policy’. International Affairs, 81(4), 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stefanova, B. (2005). The European union as a security actor: Security provision through Enlargement’. World Affairs, 168(2), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weaver, O. (2000). The EU as a security actor: Reflections from a pessimistic constuctivist on post sovereign security orders. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Wolczuk, K. (2008). Ukraine and its relations with the EU in the context of the European neighbourhood Policy’ (Chaillot paper No.108). Paris: EU Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar

Official Documents

  1. ‘A Secure Europe’ in a better world European security strategy, 12 December 2003Google Scholar
  2. Communication to the Commission: Implementing and Promoting the European Neighbourhood Policy, 22 November 2005Google Scholar
  3. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy, 4 December 2006Google Scholar
  4. European Commission Staff Working Document SEC(2008) 403, Brussels, 3 April 2008Google Scholar
  5. European Commission, EU- Ukraine Action Plan, 19 July 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/action_plans/ukraine_enp_ap_final_em.pdf

European Commission

  1. European commission staff working document accompanying the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council implementation of the European neighbourhood policy in 2009 Progress Report Ukraine, COM (2010)207Google Scholar
  2. European Parties Elections and Referendums Network (EPERN) Election Briefing Paper, 2005Google Scholar
  3. ‘A new response to a changing neighbourhood: A review of European Neighbourhood Policy’ in joint communication by the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and the European Commission, 25 May 2011Google Scholar
  4. ‘Ukrainian society’, Sociological monitoring of the Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Science (2005–2006).Google Scholar

News Agencies

  1. Lily Hyde, ‘East/West: Baltic-Black Sea Conference Revealed Divisions’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Accessed October 22, 2002 from http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/1999/09/F.R.U.990913131055.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of EU StudiesBahcesehir UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations