Gender Mainstreaming in EU—SADC Relations: The Capabilities-Expectations Gap

Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) proudly presents itself as normative power and role model to other world regions. Gender mainstreaming is one of the norms promoted by the EU in its dealings with other regional organizations. However, this norm seems to clash with the neoliberal norms incorporated in its trade regime. How does the EU deal with this clash? In this chapter, we investigate to what extent the EU behaves as a role model and teacher towards the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We argue that the exercise of normative power by the EU might be hampered in two respects, by its own inconsistencies and by the uneasy fit of its identity with SADC identity. EU trade and aid policies directed at SADC are discussed in terms of their intended and unintended consequences for gender: where is gender included and where is it absent, despite the commitment to gender mainstreaming? Inconsistencies are highlighted. Policies of SADC in the field of gender are presented, with a special focus on trade. We conclude that SADC policies are more extensively gender mainstreamed than EU aid and trade policies towards SADC. As a result, the credibility of the EU as normative power in the field of gender equality is seriously questioned.

Keywords

European Union Gender Equality Regional Integration Southern African Development Community European Union Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauer, G., & Taylor, S. (2005). Politics in Southern Africa. State & Society in Transition. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  2. Brocza, S., & Brocza, A. (2012). Chapter 6. SADC-EU relations: what happened to the Berlin Initiative?. In: Monitoring Regional Integration in Southern Africa Yearbook 2011. Trade Law Centre for Southern Africa.Google Scholar
  3. Council (2009). Council Decision on the signing and provisional application of the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st05/st05556.en09.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2012.
  4. Debusscher, P. (2011). Mainstreaming gender in European Commission development policy: Conservative Europeanness? Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. EU website. Economic partnerships > Negotiations and Agreements > SADC. http://ec.europa.eu/trade/wider-agenda/development/economic-partnerships/negotiations-and-agreements/#sadc. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  6. European Commission (2006). The EU Strategy for Africa. http://www.eu-africa-infrastructure-tf.net/attachments/library/ec-the-eu-strategy-for-africa-2006.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  7. European Commission (2007). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council; Gender Equality and Women Empowerment in Development Cooperation, SEC(2007) 332.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2008a). European Community—Southern African Region Regional Strategy Paper and Regional Indicative Programme 2008–2013 http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/scanned_r7_rsp-2007-2013_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2012.
  9. European Commission (2008b). Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an economic partnership agreement, COM(2008)863final. 16 Dec 2008.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2008c). Programming Guide for Strategy Papers. Programming Fiche Gender Equality. http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/F43_genderequality_fin_en.pdf Accessed 22 August 2012.
  11. European Commission (2012). Overview of EPA, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/september/tradoc_144912.pdf. Accessed 9 august 2012.
  12. Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s International Role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoskyns, C. (1996). Integrating gender. Women, law and politics in the European Union. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Kantola, J. (2010). Gender and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Keck, A., & Piermartini, R. (2008). The impact of economic partnership agreements in countries of the Southern African Development Community. Journal of African Economies, 17(1), 85–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiratu, S., & Roy, S. (2010). Beyond Barriers. The Gender Implications of Trade Liberalization in Southern Africa. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://www.iisd.org. Accessed 22 August 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Klotz, A. (1995). Norms in international relations: the struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2007). European Union Gender Policy since Beijing: Shifting concepts and agendas. In M. Verloo (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality. A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Madakufamba, M. (2004). SADC forges ahead with its common agenda. Southern African News Features, 04:77. http://www.sardc.net/editorial/newsfeature/04770804.htm. Accessed 22 August 2012.
  20. Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mkapa, B. (2002). Address to the SADC Summit. 3 October 2002. SADC Council and Summit Records, Annex.Google Scholar
  22. Montoya, C. (2009). International initiative and domestic reform: European Union Efforts to Combat Violence Against Women. Politics & Gender, 5, 325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Munalula, M. M. (2011). SADC protocol on gender and development: road map to equality? SADC Law Journal, 1, 189–96.Google Scholar
  24. Novitz, T. (2008). Legal power and normative sources in the field of social policy: normative power Europe at work? In J. Orbie (Ed.), Europe’s global role. External policies of the European Union (pp. 139–156). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Olivier, G., & Fioramonti, L. (2010). The emerging ‘global south’: the EU in the eyes of India, Brazil and South Africa. In S. Lucarelli & L. Fioramonti (Eds.), External perceptions of the European Union as a global actor (pp. 105–19). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Orbie, J. (Ed.). (2008). Europe’s Global Role. External policies of the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Robles, A. (2008). EU FTA Negotiations with SADC and Mercosur: integration into the world economy or market access for EU firms? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SADC (1997). SADC Declaration on Gender and Development. http://www.chr.up.ac.za/undp/subregional/docs/sadc6.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2012.
  29. SADC (2003). Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan. http://www.sadc.int/index/browse/page/104. Accessed 22 August 2012.
  30. SADC (2008). SADC Protocol on Gender and Development. http://www.sadc.int/files/7112/9916/3525/GENDER_PROTOCOL_-_ENGLISH.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2012.
  31. SARPN (2005). Rationale for a SADC Protocol on accelerating gender equality. http://www.sarpn.org/documents/d0001444/index.php. Accessed 5 Sept 2008.
  32. Saurombe, A. (2009). Regional integration Agenda for SADC “Caught in the winds of change” problems and prospects. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 4(2), 100–106.Google Scholar
  33. Sicurelli, D. (2010). The European Union’s Africa Policies. Norms, Interests and Impact. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of Regional Governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, Sovereignty Boosting and Shadow Networks. Global Governance, 10, 419–36.Google Scholar
  35. Sohet, K., & Ulmer, K. (2002). Rapid Survey of 40 ACP Country Support Strategies, Aprodev, http://www.aprodev.net/files/DevPol/ACP-PSC.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2008.
  36. Stratigaki, M. (2005). Gender mainstreaming vs positive action. An ongoing conflict in EU gender equality policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(2), 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trui, J. (2009). Trading-in gender equality: Gendered meanings in EU trade policy. In E. Lombardo, P. Meier, & M. Verloo (Eds.), The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality. Stretching, bending and policy-making (pp. 267–285). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Ulmer, K. (2004). EU-ACP trade negotiations on Economic Partnership Agreements. A gender approach. http://www.glow-boell.de/media/de/txt_rubrik_5/SuS_Ulmer_Gender_EUPartnership.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2012.
  39. Van der Vleuten, A. (2007). The price of gender equality. Member States and Governance in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  40. Van der Vleuten, A., & Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2007). Legitimacy, democracy and RIOs: Where is the gap? In A. Ribeiro Hoffmann & A. van der Vleuten (Eds.), Closing or widening the gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations (pp. 3–13). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  41. Van der Vleuten, A., & Verloo, M. (2012). Ranking and benchmarking: The political logic of new regulatory instruments in the fields of gender equality and anti-corruption. Policy & Politics, 40(1), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. WTO (2010). Trade profiles, http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFReporter.aspx?Language=E. Accessed 10 July 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations