Was There any Coherent European China Policy in the Case of the EU Arms Embargo on China?

Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

This study looks into the case of handling of the lift of the EU arms embargo on China, imposed on the wake of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre. The case illustrates how the EU is unable to formulate a common and coherent position in its China policy and how much influence the Big Three have when it comes to China and defense issues. I argue that Britain, France and Germany affect the EU sanction policy on China due to their historic and strategic ties to the PRC and their predominance in the armament industry. The methodology is a questionnaire addressed to foreign policy officials from the three member states’ governments and EU institutions during that period (2003–2005) combined with the application of three models about responses to Europeanization by Cowles et al. (Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Cornell University Press, 2001), Börzel (J Common Market Stud, 40: 193–214, 2002) and Falkner et al. (Complying with Europe: EU Harmonization and Soft law in the Member States. Cambridge University Press, 2005). Findings show that France and Germany set the agenda, formulated policies and influenced other member states to follow their policy choices through a bottom-up and horizontal process of Europeanization and that Britain was also influential in the debate but more in a swing state capacity. The findings also show that domestic factors (opposition parties, media, and public opinion) and external factors (importance of the transatlantic relationship, influence of the US in Asia and China’s attitude towards Taiwan) had a key impact on the outcome of the initiative and empowered the will of the major member states.

Keywords

Member State Foreign Policy European Council Strategic Partnership Opposition Parti 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Balme, R., & Bridges, B. (2008). Europe-Asia relations: Building multilateralism. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boden, T. (2007, December 17). Interparliamentary delegation for non European countries, European Parliament. Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  3. Bork, E. (2004, May 21). Keep a common front on arms sales to China. The Financial Times.Google Scholar
  4. Börzel, T. (2002). Pace-setting, foot-dragging and fence-setting: Member states’ responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brie, A. (2007, December 12). German Member of European Parliament/Committee Foreign Affairs. Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  6. Cowles, M. G., Caporasso, J., & Risse, T. (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crossick, S., Fraser, C., & Axel, B. (2005). EU-China relations, towards a strategic partnership (European Policy Center Working Paper). Brussels: European Policy Center.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2003, October 13). A maturing partnership - shared interests and challenges in EU-China relations (Updating the European Commission’s Communications on EU-China relations of 1998 and 2001)/*COM/2003/0533 final*. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2004, December 6). EU China summit: A growing relationship (Press release). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2008). Restrictive measures. http://eeas.europa.eu/cfsp/sanctions/docs/index_en.pdf#2.1
  11. European Council. (1989, June 26–27). EU Declaration on China Arms Embargo, Madrid.Google Scholar
  12. European Union Council. (2003, December 12). A secure Europe in a better world, European Security Strategy. Brussels: European Council. http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf
  13. European Union Council of Foreign Ministers. (1998). European Union Code of Conduct for arms exports agreed by European Union (EU), 8–9 June 1998.Google Scholar
  14. Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe: EU harmonization and soft law in the Member States. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannella, A. (2008, May 17). Personal representative of the High Representative on Non Proliferation. Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Council, Brussels.Google Scholar
  16. Glen, C. M., & Murgo, R. C. (2007). EU-China relations: Balancing political challenges with economic opportunities. Asia Europe Journal, 5(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffin, C., & Pantucci, R. (2007). A treacherous triangle China and the transatlantic alliance. SAIS Review, 27(1), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jessen, F. (2008, May 15). DG External Relations, DH 2 (China). Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. Jonas, P. (2008, June). EU foreign policy after Lisbon: Will the New High Representative and the external action service make a difference? Report Center for Applied Policy Research (C·A·P), No 2.Google Scholar
  20. Kogan, E. (2005, January). The European Union defense industry and the appeal of the Chinese market. Report, Studien und Berichte zur Sicherheitspolitik, Schriftenreihe der Landesverteidigungsakademie.Google Scholar
  21. Kreutz, J. (2004). Reviewing the arms embargo on China: The clash between value and rationale in the European Security Strategy. Perspectives: The Central European Review of International Affairs, 22, 43–58.Google Scholar
  22. Latella, S. (2007, December 18). Political advisor PSE-secretariat China delegation. Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Parliament, Brussels.Google Scholar
  23. McGowan, L. (2005). Europeanization unleashed and rebounding: Assessing the modernization of EU cartel policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 2005(6), 986–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Möller, K. (2002, March). Diplomatic relations and mutual strategic perceptions: China and the European Union. The China Quarterly, 196 (Special Issue: China and Europe since 1978: a European Perspective).Google Scholar
  25. Mure, D. (2004, March 17). EU seeks to end China arms embargo. The Financial Times.Google Scholar
  26. Mure, D., Dinmore, G., Dombey, D., Hille, K., Sevastapulo, D., & Spiegel, P. (2005, Febraury 10). The EU’s bar on selling military equipment to Beijing lacks credibility but Washington believes any change would be irresponsible. The Financial Times.Google Scholar
  27. Peel, Q. (2005, February 3). Where trade comes before politics. The Financial Times.Google Scholar
  28. Quille, G. (2007, December 18). Specialist Security and Defence Policy Department, Directorate General External Policies. Interview by Vivien Exartier, European Parliament, Brussels.Google Scholar
  29. Saalman, L., & Yuan, J.-D. (2004, July). The European Union and the Arms Ban on China. Monterey, CA: Center for Non Proliferation Studies (CNS), Monterey Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  30. Sandschneider, E. (2008). Transatlantic divergences on the rise of China. In D. Shambaugh & G. Wacker (Eds.), American and European relations with China: advancing common agendas (pp. 24–28). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenshaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs.Google Scholar
  31. Shambaugh, D. (2004). China and Europe: The emerging axis. Current History, 103(674), 243–248.Google Scholar
  32. Sipri, A. (2005, May 19–20). Military relevant EU-China trade and technology transfers: issues and problem. Paper presented at the Conference on Chinese Military Modernization: East Asian Political, Economic, and Defense Industrial Responses, Organized by the Freeman Chair in China Studies and the Pacific Forum Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Van Kemenade, W. (2006). China-EU issues: 2005–2010, commonalities, limitations, potential (Prepared for XRG China: Developments & Prospects 2005–2010 Report). Hong-Kong: European Institute for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, P. (2002, June 5). The Europeanization of British Foreign Policy and the Crisis in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the European Foreign Policy Unit Workshop on ‘Europeanisation of national foreign policies,’ London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
  35. Wolfe, A. (2004, February 11). France and Germany move to resume arms sales to China. Power and Interest News Report.Google Scholar
  36. Wong, R. (2005, May 5–6). Towards a common European Policy on China. Paper presented at the Conference ‘The European Union and the World: Asia, Enlargement and Constitutional Change’, Organized by IPSA Research Committee 3 on European Unification, Beijing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and Financial SciencesRoyal University for WomenRiffaKingdom of Bahrain

Personalised recommendations