Skip to main content

The European Union in the Northern Latitudes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Power Europe - Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

  • 1454 Accesses

Abstract

One of the consequences of climate change has been the growing interest in the Arctic region. The unprecedented rate at which the Arctic ice coverage is melting and its implications for security, maritime transport and the energy sector have resulted in a steady growth in the region’s geopolitical and strategic importance. The purpose of the presented contribution is to highlight the potential for the external action of the European Union with regard to the High North in the light of recent developments and actions taken by the Arctic nations and other global players. The paper explores the Arctic’s present governance system and the positions taken by major actors in the region, followed by an analysis of the EU Arctic policy up to the present day. It concludes with potential fields for development to overcome the EU’s external and internal constraints in its action towards the region of the High North in order to make its mark within the changing environment of world politics and to secure its place among the global powers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As Richard C. Powell points out “[w]hether the signifier ‘the Arctic’ is taken to be the Arctic Circle, the Arctic Ocean, delineations based on temperature or tree-line isographs, or the total geographical area north of 66°N, depends as much on political as geophysical factors […] allow[ing] for many narratives to be constructed about the northern latitudes” (Powell 2011, p. 105). As will be discussed further, these narratives also find their expression in debates concerning the Arctic governance framework, where attempts have been made to override the Arctic Council and marginalize it by a closer cooperation amongst the five Arctic Ocean littoral states (Canada, Denmark, Norway, the Russian Federation and the United States).

  2. 2.

    The Arctic Council is a high level intergovernmental forum providing a mechanism to address the common concerns and challenges faced by Arctic people and governments. It is comprised of the eight above mentioned Arctic nations, indigenous organizations and permanent observers, among them Permanent Observer States (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom).

  3. 3.

    Two vessels, the Beluga Fraternity and the Beluga Foresight, successfully transited the Northern Sea Route along the Russian northern coast, giving the company savings of up to $300,000 per ship due to the reduced time and fuel costs of the journey (Smith 2009).

  4. 4.

    Whereas the Russian Northern Fleet possesses the largest number of icebreakers and conventional and nuclear capabilities in the region, Norway has the most modern naval fleet with Arctic operational potential and a coast guard trained in effective protection operations in the northern waters (Järvenpää and Ries 2011, p. 136).

  5. 5.

    “It is estimated that 31 billion barrels of oil and gas in areas west of Greenland and east of Canada could be discovered” (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark 2011, p. 24).

  6. 6.

    More on the Northern Dimension in Sect. “The Arctic in EU Official Documents”.

  7. 7.

    More in Sect. “The Arctic in EU Official Documents”.

  8. 8.

    As of May, 2012.

References

  • Arctic Council (2008). The Ilulissat declaration. Ilulissat, Greenland: Arctic Ocean Conference, 27–29 May. Accessed May 11, 2012, from http://uk.nanoq.gl/Emner/News/News_from_Parliament/2008/05/~/media/66562304FA464945BB621411BFFB6E12.ashx

  • Byers, M. (2010). Who Owns the Arctic: Understanding Sovereignty Disputes in the North. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, S., McGlynn, E., & Stoessel, S., et al. (2010). EU Arctic Footprint and Policy Assessment. Berlin: Ecology Institute. Accessed June 15, 2012, from http://arctic-footprint.eu/sites/default/files/AFPA_Final_Report.pdf

  • Conley, H. A., Toland, T., & Kraut, J. (2012). A New Security Architecture for the Arctic. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2009, December 8). Council Conclusions on Arctic Issues, 2985th Foreign Affairs Council Meeting. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, C. (2011). The Future History of the Arctic: How Climate, Resources and Geopolitics are Reshaping the North, and Why It Matters to the World. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, Ch., & Lahn, G. (2012). Arctic Opening: Opportunity and Risk in the High North. Chatham House-Lloyd’s Risk Insight Report. Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/0412arctic.pdf

  • European Commission. (2007). The European Union and Russia: Close Neighbours, Global Players, Strategic Partners. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). The European Union and the Arctic. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission. [20 November, COM(2008) 763 final].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Strategic goals and recommendations for the EUs maritime transport policy until 2018. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels: European Commission. [21 January, COM(2009) 8 final].

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011). Maritime transport. What do we want to achieve? Accessed June 15, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/maritime/index_en.htm

  • European Parliament. (2008). Arctic governance: European Parliament resolution of 9 October 2008 on Arctic governance. Brussels: European Parliament. [9 October, P6_TA(2008)0474].

    Google Scholar 

  • Finland, P. M. O. (2010). Finland’s Strategy for the Arctic Region. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Offices of Sweden. (2012). The Arctic: Swedens strategy for the region. Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/14766/a/167998

  • Heininen, L. (2010). Finland’s Arctic strategy: Important sectors and objectives. GeoPolitics in the high North. Accessed May 10, 2012, from http://www.geopoliticsnorth.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=38&Itemid=106

  • Heininen, L. (2012). Arctic Strategies and Policies. Inventory and Comparative Study. Northern Research Forum. Accessed May 16, 2012, from http://www.nrf.is/images/stories/Hveragerdi/Arctic_strategies_7th_draft_New_20120428.pdf

  • High Representative and the European Commission. (2008). Climate Change and International Security: Paper from the High Representative and the European Commission to the European Council. Brussels: High Representative and the European Commission. [14 March, S113/08].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingimundarson, V. (2008). Iceland’s Security Policy and Geopolitics in the North. In K. Skogrand (Ed.), Emerging from the Frost. Security in the 21st century Arctic (pp. 9–15). Oslo Files on Defence and Security 02/2008. Accessed May 8, 2012, from http://brage.bibsys.no/fhs/bitstream/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_26263/1/OF_2_2008.pdf

  • International Northern Sea Route Programme, INSROP Overview. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.fni.no/insrop/

  • Jakobson, L. (2010). China prepares for an ice-free Arctic. SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security. No. 2010/2. Accessed May 10, 2012, from http://books.sipri.org/files/insight/SIPRIInsight1002.pdf

  • Järvenpää, P., & Ries, T. (2011). The Rise of the Arctic on the Global Stage. In J. Kraska (Ed.), Arctic Security in an Age of Climate Change (pp. 129–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T. (2009). Limits and possibilities of the Arctic Council in a rapidly changing scene of Arctic governance. Polar Record, 46(02), 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, K. (2009). US Security Policy and Regional Relations in a Warming Arctic. Swords and ploughshares (Vol. XVII, no. 3). Accessed May 14, 2012, from http://acdis.illinois.edu/assets/docs/505/articles/USSecurityPolicyandRegionalRelationsinaWarmingArctic.pdf

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark. (2011). Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands: Kingdom of Denmark Strategy for the Arctic 2011–2020. Copenhagen/Nuuk/Tinganes: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). The High North. Visions and strategies. Oslo/Tromsø: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerdal, K. (2011). The EU in the Arctic. In pursuit of legitimacy and influence. International Journal, LXVI(4), 861–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perovich, D., Meier, W., Maslanik, J., & Richter-Menge, J. (2011). Sea Ice. In J. Richter-Menge, M. O. Jeffries, J. E. Overland (Eds.), Arctic Report Card 2011. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard

  • Powell, R. C. (2011). From the Northern Dimension to Arctic Strategies? The European Union’s Envisioning of the High Latitudes. In L. Bialasiewicz (Ed.), Europe in the World. EU Geopolitics and the Making of European Space (pp. 105–126). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2009, September 17). Global Warming Reopens the Northeast Passage. Time. Accessed May 5, 2012, from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1924410,00.html

  • Stokke, O. S. (2011). Environmental security in the Arctic. The case for multilevel governance. International Journal, LXVI (4), 835–848

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2008). 90 Billion Barrels of Oil and 1,670 Trillion Cubic Feet of Natural Gas Assessed in the Arctic. Accessed May 5, 2012, http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1980

  • United Nations (1982). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Accessed June 4, 2012, from http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf

  • Weber, S., & Romanyshyn, I. (2011). Breaking the ice. The European Union and the Arctic. International Journal, LXVI(4), 849–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (2009). National Security Presidential Directive/ NSPD—66/ Homeland Security Presidential Directive/ HSPD—25. Washington, DC: Office of the Press Secretary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysk, K. (2010). Russia’s Arctic Strategy. Ambitions and Constraints. Joint force quarterly, NDU Press, 57/2010. Accessed May 15, 2012, from http://www.ndu.edu/press/lib/images/jfq-57/zysk.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Śmieszek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Śmieszek, M. (2013). The European Union in the Northern Latitudes. In: Boening, A., Kremer, JF., van Loon, A. (eds) Global Power Europe - Vol. 2. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32416-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics