Abstract
This chapter is a theoretical attempt to study the multifaceted authority of the European Union (EU) in world politics. Authority is legitimated power. Without legitimacy, power often faces severe resistance whereas legitimate actions and actorness imply less opposition if not widespread support. Informed by the thesis of Steven Lukes on three-dimensional power and Mark Suchman’s trichotomy of legitimacy, this chapter advances three dimensions of the EU’s authority in the world and discusses how the EU could maintain and/or restore its legitimacy in the global arena.
Buhari Gulmez, Didem. Ph.D. in Politics and International Relations/University of London; MSc by Research in Politics/University of Edinburgh; DES in International Relations/Paris Institute of Strategic and International Relations (IRIS SUP). Her research interests include international legitimacy, European Union, World Polity, and systemic theories in international relations. She has published in the Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, and International Political Sociology amongst others.
Gulmez, Seckin Baris. Ph.D. candidate in Politics and International Relations/University of London; MSc in Politics and International Relations/University of London; MSc in International Relations/Middle East Technical University; Post Graduate Certificate in Contemporary European Studies at University of Birmingham. He studies eurocepticism in political parties of accession countries with a particular focus on Turkey. His publications appeared in several journals including Turkish Studies and Acta Politica.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
Batory, A. (2008). Euroscepticism in the Hungarian party system: Voices from the wilderness? In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 263–276). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boli, J., & Thomas, G. (1999). Constructing world culture: International non-governmental organizations Since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Buhari-Gulmez, D. (2012). Europeanization of foreign policy and world culture: Turkey’s Cyprus policy. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12(1), 81–95.
Cavatorta, F. (2009). Divided they stand, divided they fail: Opposition politics in Morocco. Democratization, 16(1), 137–156.
Clark, I. (2005). Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Claude, I., Jr. (1966). Collective legitimization as a political function of the United Nations. International Organization, 20(1), 367–79.
Coen, D., & Dannreuther, C. (2003). Differentiated Europeanization: Large and small firms in the EU policy process. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 255–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American City. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
De Castro, R. B. (2010). The European Union, Turkey and democratic secularism: tentative reflections on an emerging condition. Working Paper. Middle East Technical University Centre for European Studies. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://www.ces.metu.edu.tr/docs/ceswp1.pdf
Diez, T., Agnantopoulos, A., & Kaliber, A. (2005). File: Turkey, Europeanization and civil society: Introduction. South European Society and Politics, 10(1), 1–15.
EuroBulletin Bulgaria (2001). Interview with Velislav Velichkov: The rules valid for the European Union, should be valid for Bulgaria too. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://eubulletin.mfa.government.bg/Highlights.asp
European Commission. (2004). Recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey’s progress towards accession. Brussels. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2004:0656:FIN:EN:PDF
European Commission. (2005, October 3). Negotiating framework. Luxembourg. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/turkey/st20002_05_tr_framedoc_en.pdf
Follesdall, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.
Fowler, A. (1993). Non-governmental organizations as agents of democratization: An African perspective. Journal of International Development, 5(3), 325–339.
Franck, T. M. (1990). Power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giuliani, M. (2001). Europeanization and Italy: A bottom-up process? In K. Featherstone & G. Kazamias (Eds.), Europeanization and the southern periphery (pp. 47–73). London: Frank Cass.
Gokalp, D., & Unsar, S. (2008). From the myth of European Union accession to disillusion: Implications for religious and ethnic politicization in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 62(1), 93–116.
Grabbe, H. (2003). Europeanization goes East: Power and uncertainty in the EU accession process. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 303–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gulmez, S. B. (2008). The EU policy of the republican people’s party: An inquiry on the opposition party and Euro-Skepticism in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(3), 423–436.
Gulmez, S.B. (2010). Decoding the foreign policy orientations of the CHP deputies. Opinion paper. Changing Turkey in a changing world. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://changingturkey.com/2010/01/13/decoding-the-foreign-policy-orientations-of-the-chp-deputies/
Gulmez, S. B., & Buhari-Gulmez, D. (2008). The EU conditionality in the Cyprus problem: Catalyzing Euro-Skepticism in Turkey? Journal of Cyprus Studies, 14(1), 1–38.
Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. (Eds.). (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanley, S. (2008). Embracing Europe, opposing EU-rope? Party-based Euroscepticism in the Czech Republic. In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 243–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harcourt, A. J. (2003). Europeanization as convergence: The regulation of media markets in the European Union. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 179–203). Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Hill, C. (2004). Renationalizing or regrouping? EU foreign policy since 11 September 2001. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 143–63.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2008). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
Hurriyet. (2004). TESEV accused of discouraging military service. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://webarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/2004/06/07/471266.asp
Kagan, R. (2003). Of paradise and power: America and Europe in the new world order. Washington, DC: Knopf Publishers.
Kirisci, K. (2006). Turkey’s foreign policy in turbulent times. Chaillot Paper 92. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/cp092.pdf
Kissinger, H. A. (1977). American foreign policy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
Laffan, B. (2004). The European Union and its institutions as identity builders. In R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse-Kappen, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 75–94). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.
Marcussen, M., Risse, T., Engelmann-Martin, D., Knopf, H. J., & Roscher, K. (1999). Constructing Europe? The evolution of French, British and German nation state identities. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 614–33.
Marusic, S.J. (2011). Macedonia leader renews attacks on EU critics. Balkan insight. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonian-pm-renews-criticism-of-brussels
Mayer, H. (2008). Is it still called Chinese whispers? The EU’s rhetoric and action as a responsible global institution. International Affairs, 84(1), 61–79.
Mikkel, E., & Kasekamp, A. (2008). Emerging party-based euroscepticism in Estonia. In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 295–313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pace, R. (2011). Malta: Euroscepticism in a polarised polity. South European Society and Politics, 16(01), 133–157.
Pace, M., Seeberg, P., & Cavatorta, F. (2009). The EU’s democratization agenda in the Mediterranean: A critical inside-out approach. Democratization, 16(1), 3–19.
Panebianco, S. (2006). The constraints on EU action as a ‘norm exporter’ in the Mediterranean. In O. Elgström & M. Smith (Eds.), The EU’s roles in international politics (pp. 136–153). London: Routledge.
Radikal. (2012). Kılıçdaroğlu: Siyasi hayatımı feda etmeye hazırım [Kılıçdaroğlu: I am ready to sacrifice my political career]. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalDetayV3&ArticleID=1081204&CategoryID=78
Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International crises of legitimacy. International Politics, 44(1), 157–174.
Riishøj, S. (2007). Europeanization and Euroscepticism: Experiences from Poland and the Czech Republic. Nationalities Papers, 35(3), 502–535.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2008). EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: Consistency and effectiveness. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 918–937.
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sjursen, H. (2006). Values or rights? Alternative conceptions of the EU’s normative’ role. In O. Elgström & M. Smith (Eds.), The EU’s roles in international politics (pp. 85–100). London: Routledge.
Sofos, S. A. (2001). Reluctant Europeans? European integration and the transformation of Turkish politics. In K. Featherstone & G. Kazamias (Eds.), Europeanization and the southern periphery (pp. 243–261). London, UK: Frank Cass.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Szczerbiak, A. (2008). Opposing Europe or problematizing Europe? Euroscepticism and Eurorealism in the polish party system. In A. Szczerbiak & P. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (pp. 221–242). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tesser, L. M. (2004). East-Central Europe’s new security concern: Foreign land ownership. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 37(1), 213–239.
Zorić, K. (2008). ZERP ili EU—recept za širenje euroskepticizma [ZERP or the EU—a recipe for the spread of euro-skepticism]. Nacional. Accessed July 1, 2012, from http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/43248/zerp-ili-eu-recept-za-sirenje-euroskepticizma
Zuba, K. (2009). Through the looking glass: The attitudes of polish political parties towards the EU before and after accession. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 10(3), 326–349.
Zucker, L. G. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. B. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 1–42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Zucker, L. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83–107). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gulmez, D.B., Gulmez, S.B. (2013). Theorizing the European Union’s Global Authority: An Alternative Trichotomy. In: Boening, A., Kremer, JF., van Loon, A. (eds) Global Power Europe - Vol. 1. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32412-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32412-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32411-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32412-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)