Abstract
The changing global order raises interesting questions about the future of the European Union’s global power. The EU expresses multiple types of power, but it has been most famously characterized as a normative power, having an ability to shape the ‘normality’ of global politics. The normative power argument has been much disputed, and there seems to be little agreement over its exact meaning. The conceptual vagueness makes it difficult to assess the future of the EU’s normative power. This chapter argues that normative power is about the promotion of universal normative principles and multilateral working methods. However, both of these elements are challenged by the emergence of a post-Western world order and the resurgence of more traditional realist power politics. Currently the EU has faced difficulties in shaping the global environment, and its normative power role has been unsettled. This chapter presents how the normative power concept is conditioned by external and internal factors that have changed the constellation over time. This “temporality” also explains the nature of the current challenges for normative power.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bretherton and Vogler (2006).
- 2.
These criteria do not presuppose each other (Forsberg 2011a, p. 1191).
- 3.
This fact does not diminish the value of internal conditions, like the internal political context and capability in determining the role of an actor (see Tocci 2008).
- 4.
Gerrits (2009).
- 5.
Dinan (2004, p. 125).
- 6.
Duchêne (1973, pp. 19–20).
- 7.
Duchêne (1972, p. 43).
- 8.
Civilian power concept was developed at least in three “waves” during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. In the end there were several different perceptions of what this civilian role was actually about.
- 9.
Orbie (2008, p. 7).
- 10.
Bull (1982, pp. 151–153).
- 11.
Manners (2002, pp. 236, 238).
- 12.
Bickerton (2011, p. 26).
- 13.
Manners (2002, p. 240).
- 14.
Manners (2002, p. 252).
- 15.
Diez and Manners (2007, p. 175).
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
Manners (2009, p. 12).
- 19.
Manners (2002, p. 242).
- 20.
Forsberg (2011a, p. 1196).
- 21.
Manners (2002, pp. 244–245).
- 22.
Aggestam (2009, p. 27).
- 23.
Whitman (2011, p. 1).
- 24.
Aggestam (2008, p. 4).
- 25.
In reality, the EU was not a unitary actor and there were divisions between Member States.
- 26.
Hyde-Price (2006, pp. 217–218).
- 27.
Diez (2005).
- 28.
Natalie Tocci separates three conditions for actor’s normative behaviour: internal political context, internal capability and external environment (Tocci 2008). Even if I consider the external factor most important in the construction of roles, it is not to deny the relevance of different internal conditions.
- 29.
Dinan (2004, pp. 233–234).
- 30.
A Secure Europe in a Better World (2003, p. 13).
- 31.
Toje (2009, p. 37).
- 32.
Manners (2006c, p. 168).
- 33.
Manners (2009, p. 23).
- 34.
European Security Strategy (2003) speaks only about the EU as a global player. Is the concept of ‘power’ avoided because of its possible negative connotations or because of the uncertainty about the EU’s power capabilities?
- 35.
De Zutter (2010, p. 1115).
- 36.
Forsberg (2011a, pp. 1190–1191).
- 37.
Forsberg (2011a, pp. 1191).
- 38.
Forsberg (2011a, pp. 1199–1200).
- 39.
Lukes (2007, pp. 83–84).
- 40.
The relationship between the concepts of ‘power’ and ‘influence’ is also difficult to define. Power has been treated as a subcategory of influence and influence has been considered as a specific form of power.
- 41.
De Zutter (2010, pp. 1109, 1118–1119).
- 42.
This division was originally made by Edward Carr in 1962 (Forsberg 2011b, pp. 218–219).
- 43.
Manners (2002, p. 239). This categorization can of course be challenged.
- 44.
Manners (2009, p. 10).
- 45.
Diez and Manners (2007, p. 180).
- 46.
The EU has copied the technologies and habits of other actors for instance in the ‘war on terror’ and the ‘securitization’ of ordinary life, or in trying to rival other ‘great powers’ (Manners 2009, p. 15).
- 47.
Nye (2004, pp. 31–32).
- 48.
Nye (2011, p. xiii).
- 49.
Moravcsik (2010, p. 153).
- 50.
Diez and Manners (2007, p. 179).
- 51.
Forsberg (2011a, p. 1195).
- 52.
Barnett and Duvall (2005, p. 3).
- 53.
Their framework is however, distinctively constructivist (Bially Mattern 2011, p. 696).
- 54.
Diez and Manners (2007, p. 183).
- 55.
Manners original example of the EU’s norm-driven practice was the abolition of death penalty. Because this practice did not serve any European (material) interest, it distinguished the EU from other political actors (Manners 2002, p. 251).
- 56.
Treaty of Lisbon, article 1.
- 57.
Manners mentions the UN Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, the Paris Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and UN Covenants, and the Council of Europe/European Convention on Human Rights (Manners 2009, p. 12).
- 58.
Treaty of Lisbon, article 21.
- 59.
De Zutter (2010, p. 1109).
- 60.
Treaty of Lisbon, article 21.
- 61.
Blavoukos and Bourantonis (2011, p. 8).
- 62.
Pouliot (2011, pp. 18–22).
- 63.
Lucarelli and Manners (2005), in Blavoukos and Bourantonis (2011, p. 7).
- 64.
The European Security Strategy 2003.
- 65.
Toje (2009, p. 43).
- 66.
Forsberg (2011a, p. 1194).
- 67.
Jørgensen (2009) offers a good overview of how the EU supports effective multilateralism and global governance in different international organizations.
- 68.
Moravcsik (2010, p. 153).
- 69.
See for example Brantner and Gowan (2008) for an analysis about the EU’s human rights promotion at the UN.
- 70.
Newman (2006, p. 160).
- 71.
Newman (2006, p. 175).
- 72.
Jokela (2011).
- 73.
Laatikainen and Smith (2006, pp. 2–3).
- 74.
Ortega (2007, p. 95).
- 75.
Youngs (2010, p. 7).
- 76.
Moravcsik (2010).
References
Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1–11.
Aggestam, L. (2009). The world in our mind: Normative power in a multi-polar world. In A. Gerrits (Ed.), Normative power europe in a changing world: A discussion (Clingendael European Papers No. 5). Netherlands Institute of International Relations
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bially Mattern, J. (2011). The concept of power and the (Un)discipline of international relations. In S. Duncan & C. Reus-Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 691–698). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickerton, C. (2011). Legitimacy through norms: The political limits to Europe’s normative power. In R. Whitman (Ed.), Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2011). The EU presence in international organizations. London: Routledge.
Brantner, F. & Gowan, R.(2008). A global force for human rights? An audit of European power at the UN. ECFR Policy paper, September 2008
Bretherton, C., & Vogler, J. (2006). European Union as a global actor (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Bull, H. (1982). Civilian power Europe. A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2), 149–170.
De Zutter, E. (2010). ‘Normative power spotting: An ontological and methodological appraisal. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1106–1127.
Desmond, D. (2004). Europe recast. A history of European Union. Palgrave Macmillan
Diez, T. (2005). Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering ‘normative power Europe. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33, 613–636.
Diez, T., & Manners, I. (2007). Reflecting on normative power Europe. In F. Berenskoetter & M. J. Williams (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 173–188). London: Routledge.
Duchêne, F. (1972). Europe’s Role in world peace. In R. Mayne (Ed.), Europe tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans look ahead (pp. 32–47). London: Fontana.
Duchêne, F. (1973). The European community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In M. Kohnstamm & W. Hager (Eds.), A nation writ large? foreign-policy problems before the community (pp. 1–21). London: Macmillan.
Forsberg, T. (2011a). Normative power Europe, once again: A conceptual analysis of an ideal type. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1183–1204.
Forsberg, T. (2011b). Power in international relations: An interdisciplinary perspective. In P. Aalto, V. Harle, & S. Moisio (Eds.), International studies. Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 207–227). Palgrave Macmillan
Gerrits, A. (2009). Normative power europe in a changing world: A discussion (Clingendael European Papers No. 5). Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael
Hyde-Price, A. (2006). ‘Normative’ Power europe: A realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 217–234.
Jokela, J. (2011). The G-20: a Pathway to Effective Multilateralism?, Chaillot Papers no 125, April 2011.
Jørgensen, K. E. (2009). The European Union and international organizations: A framework for analysis. In K. E. Jørgensen (Ed.), European Union and international organizations. London: Routledge.
Laatikainen, K., & Smith, K. (2006). Introduction—The European Union at the United Nations: Leader, partner or failure? In K. Laatikainen, & K. Smith (Eds.), The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting multilateralisms. Palgrave Macmillan
Lukes, S. (2007). Power and the battle for hearts and minds: On the bluntness of soft power. In F. Berenskoetter & M. J. Williams (Eds.), Power in world politics. London: Routledge.
Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–238.
Manners, I. (2006a). Normative power Europe reconsidered: Beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 182–199.
Manners, I. (2006b). The constitutive nature of values, images and principles in foreign policy. In S. Lucarelli & I. Manners (Eds.), Values and principles in European foreign policy (pp. 19–41). New York: Routledge.
Manners, I. (2006c). The European Union as a normative power: A response to Thomas diez. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35(1), 167–180.
Manners, I. (2007). European Union, normative power and ethical foreign policy. In D. Chandler & V. Heins (Eds.), Rethinking ethical foreign policies (pp. 116–136). New York: Pitfalls, Problems and Paradoxes, Routledge.
Manners, I. (2009). The EU’s normative power in changing world politics. In G. Andrè (Ed.), Normative power Europe in a changing world: A discussion (Clingendael European Papers No.5). Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael: The Hague, Netherlands.
Moravcsik, A. (2010). Europe: Rising superpower in a bipolar world. In A. Alexandroff & A. Cooper (Eds.), Rising states, rising institutions: Challenges for global governance (pp. 151–174). Washington DC: Brookings Institutions Press.
Newman, E. (2006). Multilateral crises in historical perspective. In E. Newman, R. Thakur, & J. Tirman (Eds.), Multilateralism under challenge? Power, international order, and structural change. Japan: United Nations University Press, United Nations University.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, J. (2011). The future of power. New York: Public Affairs.
Orbie, J. (2008). A civilian power in the world? Instruments and objectives in European union external policies. In J. Orbie (Ed.), Europe’s Global role. External policies of the European Union (pp. 1–33). Farnham: Ashgate.
Ortega, M. (2007). Building the Future: The EU’s Contribution to Global Governance, Chaillot Paper No 100, April 2007
Pouliot, V. (2011). Multilateralism as an end in itself. International Studies Perspectives, 12, 18–26.
Tocci, N. (2008). Profiling normative foreign policy: The European union and its global partners. In N. Tocci (Ed.), Who is a normative foreign policy actor? The European union and its global partners (CEPS Paperback Series 3/2008). Centre for European Policy Studies: Brussels.
Toje, A. (2009). Normative Power in Europe after the post-cold War. In A. Gerrits (Ed.), Normative power Europe in a changing world: A discussion (Clingendael European Papers No.5). Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael: The Hague, Netherlands.
Whitman, R. (2011). Norms, power and Europe: A New agenda for study of the EU and international relations. In R. Whitman (Ed.), Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Youngs, R. (2010). Europe’s Decline and fall: The struggle against global irrelevance. London: Profile Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuominen, H. (2013). The Changing Context of Global Governance and the Normative Power of the European Union. In: Boening, A., Kremer, JF., van Loon, A. (eds) Global Power Europe - Vol. 1. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32412-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32412-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32411-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32412-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)