Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap: Automatic Verified Abstraction of C

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 7406)

Abstract

Before low-level imperative code can be reasoned about in an interactive theorem prover, it must first be converted into a logical representation in that theorem prover. Accurate translations of such code should be conservative, choosing safe representations over representations convenient to reason about. This paper bridges the gap between conservative representation and convenient reasoning. We present a tool that automatically abstracts low-level C semantics into higher level specifications, while generating proofs of refinement in Isabelle/HOL for each translation step. The aim is to generate a verified, human-readable specification, convenient for further reasoning.

Keywords

  • Execution Path
  • Exception Handler
  • Loop Body
  • guardE Statement
  • Translation Step

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32347-8_8
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-32347-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkassar, E., Hillebrand, M., Leinenbach, D., Schirmer, N., Starostin, A., Tsyban, A.: Balancing the load — leveraging a semantics stack for systems verification. JAR: Special Issue Operat. Syst. 42(2-4), 389–454 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkassar, E., Paul, W.J., Starostin, A., Tsyban, A.: Pervasive Verification of an OS Microkernel. In: Leavens, G.T., O’Hearn, P., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) VSTTE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6217, pp. 71–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Cock, D., Klein, G., Sewell, T.: Secure Microkernels, State Monads and Scalable Refinement. In: Mohamed, O.A., Muñoz, C., Tahar, S. (eds.) TPHOLs 2008. LNCS, vol. 5170, pp. 167–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, E., Dahlweid, M., Hillebrand, M., Leinenbach, D., Moskal, M., Santen, T., Schulte, W., Tobies, S.: VCC: A Practical System for Verifying Concurrent C. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 23–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. The Frama-C platform (2008), http://www.frama-c.cea.fr/

  6. ISO/IEC. Programming languages — C. Technical Report 9899:TC2, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG14 (May 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klein, G., Elphinstone, K., Heiser, G., Andronick, J., Cock, D., Derrin, P., Elkaduwe, D., Engelhardt, K., Kolanski, R., Norrish, M., Sewell, T., Tuch, H., Winwood, S.: seL4: Formal verification of an OS kernel. In: 22nd SOSP, pp. 207–220. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moy, Y.: Automatic Modular Static Safety Checking for C Programs. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Sud, Paris, France (January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muchnick, S.S.: Advanced Compiler Design and Implementation. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L., Wenzel, M.: Isabelle/HOL. LNCS, vol. 2283. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Norrish, M.: C-to-Isabelle parser, version 0.7.2 (January 2012), http://ertos.nicta.com.au/software/c-parser/

  12. Schirmer, N.: Verification of Sequential Imperative Programs in Isabelle/HOL. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tuch, H.: Formal Memory Models for Verifying C Systems Code. PhD thesis, School Comp. Sci. & Engin., University NSW, Sydney 2052, Australia (August 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tuch, H., Klein, G., Norrish, M.: Types, bytes, and separation logic. In: Hofmann, M., Felleisen, M. (eds.) 34th POPL, pp. 97–108. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winwood, S., Klein, G., Sewell, T., Andronick, J., Cock, D., Norrish, M.: Mind the Gap: A Verification Framework for Low-Level C. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 2009. LNCS, vol. 5674, pp. 500–515. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greenaway, D., Andronick, J., Klein, G. (2012). Bridging the Gap: Automatic Verified Abstraction of C. In: Beringer, L., Felty, A. (eds) Interactive Theorem Proving. ITP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7406. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32347-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32347-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32346-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32347-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)